Skip to comments.
Senators near compromise on immigration reform (HERE IT COMES)
REUTERS ^
| 16 March 2006
| Donna Smith
Posted on 03/16/2006 1:51:16 PM PST by VU4G10
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 381-400, 401-420, 421-440, 441-448 next last
To: american spirit
If most Americans knew that illegals were getting tapayer financed benefits for housing, medical, etc. and are now being offered below market interest rates for home loans as well as the fact that thanks to Bush et al they will now receive Social Security benefits, even the dubest dumbed down Americans can figure this nonsense out...... As long as Americans get their socialism they don't seem to mind others getting it also. If we end the taxpayer subsidies altogether we will both be very happy. Buchananites always ignore the beneficial aspects of illegal immigration and that is why they can't stop it. We have 4.8% unemployment and the labor market is getting tighter with every aborted baby. Even if we could completely seal the Mexican border, it would not solve the labor vacuum that causes illegal immigration. Increasing legal immigration will do more to solve the problem than border security.
and I didn't even touch on the fact that more and more illegals are committing very heinous crimes against Americans.
I believe the fact that many workers in this country are considered criminals by there very existence, within our borders, contributes to their callous attitude toward our laws. I think a program that identifies them may reduce crime just in the act of documenting their existence, and at least free up resources to go after undocumented immigrants.
421
posted on
03/21/2006 2:40:24 PM PST
by
Once-Ler
(Principled conservatives don't vote for $trillion budgets and blame Dubya for signing them.)
To: Once-Ler
My question to you was "Have you ever thought to ask yourself why the leaders of the anti-immigration movement can't get elected to statewide office much less be thought of as a national leader?" You have failed to answer my question.What "anti-immigration movement" are you referring to here? Certainly nothing I was talking about.
[So you can conclude from that datum either a) that Bush and Kerry are the two most popular politicians in America, or b) that the two parties really do not serve the interests of the people. Assuming the latter (which I think would be the conclusion of most rational people)]
You assume too much. Including that your views are rational.
So you're going with a)? You really think that Bush and Kerry are the two most popular politicians in the country?
Wow.
422
posted on
03/21/2006 2:41:28 PM PST
by
inquest
(If you favor any legal status for illegal aliens, then do not claim to be in favor of secure borders)
To: Once-Ler
Even if we could completely seal the Mexican borderWhich we could, quite handily
it would not solve the labor vacuum that causes illegal immigration. Increasing legal immigration will do more to solve the problem than border security.
Fine, we can talk about doing that once we've secured the border, which wouldn't be hard to do at all. But legalizing illegals here without making them go back first is out of the question.
423
posted on
03/21/2006 2:44:55 PM PST
by
inquest
(If you favor any legal status for illegal aliens, then do not claim to be in favor of secure borders)
To: inquest
You really think that Bush and Kerry are the two most popular politicians in the country? Yes.
424
posted on
03/21/2006 2:59:08 PM PST
by
Once-Ler
(Principled conservatives don't vote for $trillion budgets and blame Dubya for signing them.)
To: inquest
Fine, we can talk about doing that once we've secured the border Actually I can talk about it now since I believe labor demand is the root cause of illegal immigration. When you guy win a Senate seat or Gov office we can talk about expelling 20 million people. Till then your just a Tancredo lackey and Tancredo's star is fading.
425
posted on
03/21/2006 3:03:37 PM PST
by
Once-Ler
(Principled conservatives don't vote for $trillion budgets and blame Dubya for signing them.)
Comment #426 Removed by Moderator
To: Once-Ler
"Increasing legal immigration will do more to solve the problem than border security."
Not quite right. Increasing legal immigration from mexico would do it. Now you might support a massive preference for mexicans in our immigration policy but I dont.
427
posted on
03/21/2006 3:40:14 PM PST
by
mthom
To: Once-Ler
Kerry has fallen off the map.
428
posted on
03/21/2006 3:41:19 PM PST
by
mthom
To: Once-Ler
"When you guy win a Senate seat or Gov office we can talk about expelling 20 million people. Till then your just a Tancredo lackey and Tancredo's star is fading."And here I thought there was some hope for you. Apparently not.
429
posted on
03/21/2006 3:47:56 PM PST
by
Czar
(StillFedUptotheTeeth@Washington)
To: american spirit
Thank you for another hysterical run-on sentence.
430
posted on
03/21/2006 5:19:00 PM PST
by
Once-Ler
(Principled conservatives don't vote for $trillion budgets and blame Dubya for signing them.)
To: mthom
Now you might support a massive preference for mexicans in our immigration policy but I dont. I don't care.
431
posted on
03/21/2006 5:21:10 PM PST
by
Once-Ler
(Principled conservatives don't vote for $trillion budgets and blame Dubya for signing them.)
To: Czar
And here I thought there was some hope for you. This is most distressing. I have been praying for your approval, and now it is not forthcoming. I guess I will have to look for approval from normal people now.
432
posted on
03/21/2006 5:24:48 PM PST
by
Once-Ler
(Principled conservatives don't vote for $trillion budgets and blame Dubya for signing them.)
To: Once-Ler
[You really think that Bush and Kerry are the two most popular politicians in the country?] Yes.
Then you're not in much of a position to be condemning anyone else's assessment of the situation as irrational.
433
posted on
03/21/2006 5:41:44 PM PST
by
inquest
(If you favor any legal status for illegal aliens, then do not claim to be in favor of secure borders)
To: Once-Ler
Here's the short version.......being a useful idiot is no way to go through life.
To: Once-Ler
When you guy win a Senate seat or Gov office we can talk about expelling 20 million people.Who said anything about expelling 20 million people?
Till then your just a Tancredo lackey and Tancredo's star is fading.
As you desperately hope. Nice to see that's all you have, though.
435
posted on
03/21/2006 5:47:34 PM PST
by
inquest
(If you favor any legal status for illegal aliens, then do not claim to be in favor of secure borders)
To: Czar
There was some hope for him. Until he started losing the argument.
436
posted on
03/21/2006 5:49:36 PM PST
by
inquest
(If you favor any legal status for illegal aliens, then do not claim to be in favor of secure borders)
To: inquest
"Until he started losing the argument."He always loses the argument. Especially the one about being a loyal American conservative. He failed to make the cut.
437
posted on
03/21/2006 5:58:07 PM PST
by
Czar
(StillFedUptotheTeeth@Washington)
To: inquest
Then you're not in much of a position to be condemning anyone else's assessment of the situation as irrational. I haven't seen any valid argument from you to show Bush and Kerry are not the 2 most popular politicians in the country, or even one example of a more popular politician. But then I didn't really expect evidence that would support your opinion.
438
posted on
03/21/2006 11:20:40 PM PST
by
Once-Ler
(Principled conservatives don't vote for $trillion budgets and blame Dubya for signing them.)
To: american spirit
Here's the short version....... I expect no more from you.
being a useful idiot is no way to go through life.
I thought you might have stumbled upon a nugget of self awareness until I saw the word "useful."
439
posted on
03/21/2006 11:30:42 PM PST
by
Once-Ler
(Principled conservatives don't vote for $trillion budgets and blame Dubya for signing them.)
To: inquest
Who said anything about expelling 20 million people? I assumed since you want to seal the border, expelling the illegals currently here was the next step. No? OK, I'll retract my statement.
440
posted on
03/21/2006 11:33:50 PM PST
by
Once-Ler
(Principled conservatives don't vote for $trillion budgets and blame Dubya for signing them.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 381-400, 401-420, 421-440, 441-448 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson