Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush Urges Elderly to Explore Drug Plan
AP via Yahoo News ^ | 03/14/06 | Jennifer Loven

Posted on 03/14/2006 3:18:57 PM PST by kenth

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 last
To: CharlesWayneCT

Look pal, I've been reading your posts for while. You seem like a nice guy, but you're prone to long winded diatribes that don't answer the questions of the debate. I'm hear to discuss political conservatism, in the context of a conservative policy agenda for America. That is what Free Republic is all about and what I'm all about. One more time. The new Prescription Drug Program is anathema to the conservative agenda. It is a liberal socialist, welfare entitlement program and it should not exist. From your ongoing defense of the PDP, I can only conclude you support it. That is not the conservative position. Nuff said.


61 posted on 03/16/2006 11:35:16 AM PST by Reagan Man (Secure our borders;punish employers who hire illegals;stop all welfare to illegals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man
From your ongoing defense of the PDP

I'd like to agree with you, except that I have not been defending the drug plan, much less mounting an ongoing defense of the plan.

I simply noted a Fox report that a poll found most people eligible for the program had a favorable opinion of it, and that my father-in-law said it saved him money.

When my name was put in a list of pings where someone argued against the program, I did not respond. When you responded to that post in a manner that might lead some to think that, because my name was in the list of pings, that I was a supporter of the plan, or had even posted any arguments for the plan, I simply responded to correct the possibly misleading inference.

Since then you have seemingly been arguing with that refutation, suggesting that if I have anything good to say about the program, I must be supporting it and therefore am not a conservative.

I believe I have sufficiently put that idea to rest, if not for you at least for anybody who has bothered to follow the last few posts.

62 posted on 03/16/2006 12:20:48 PM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: FBD

Good ideas. Which is surely why none of them have a chance.


63 posted on 03/16/2006 2:05:35 PM PST by Pelham ("Borders? We don' need no stinking borders!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Pelham

sad, but true. The only thing we can always count on is bureaucratic bungling, and political posturing.


64 posted on 03/16/2006 9:22:27 PM PST by FBD (surf's up!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson