Skip to comments.
Spill estimate largest ever on Alaska's North Slope
ap on San Diego Union Tribune ^
| 3/10/06
| Rachel D'oro - ap
Posted on 03/10/2006 7:17:18 PM PST by NormsRevenge
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-62 next last
On the Net:
BP Exploration (Alaska) Inc.: alaska.bp.com/
Unified Command information site: www.dec.state.ak.us
To: NormsRevenge
Wow, two whole acres. Another acre and a half and it would be the size of my yard.
2
posted on
03/10/2006 7:20:23 PM PST
by
cripplecreek
(Never a minigun handy when you need one.)
To: NormsRevenge
It's a part of the feed lines that they haven't been inspecting. Carries crude, some of it sludgy. Really crude crude. The pipelines and plant are 30 years old, which is getting old, so this kind of thing will probably be happening more.
3
posted on
03/10/2006 7:23:19 PM PST
by
RightWhale
(pas de lieu, Rhone que nous)
To: NormsRevenge
They also don't tell you that the ocean naturally secretes oil.
To: RightWhale
"this kind of thing will probably be happening more."
It won't be happening when we drill in ANWR, those lines will new, clean and leakproof.
5
posted on
03/10/2006 7:29:06 PM PST
by
reasonisfaith
(Liberals will never stand up like men and fight for their true beliefs.)
To: NormsRevenge
"It was located deep inside insulation of the transit line in a low-lying section designed to let caribou pass."
So it appears the leak went undetected exactly because they placed this portion underground or under the snow for the caribou?
Only polluted 2 acres of an industrial area, not that big a deal, plus now we see this is the source of almost 20% of our donmestic oil. Imagine if we truly developed Alaska for oil?
6
posted on
03/10/2006 7:31:13 PM PST
by
Williams
To: LauraleeBraswell
Really not "the oceans" but natural seeps from underlying
oil bearing formations in the ocean floor. There are many off the SoCal coast like at Santa Barbara, CA.
Since the tundra, by definition, is frozen the damage should be nil.
7
posted on
03/10/2006 7:32:19 PM PST
by
TaMoDee
To: reasonisfaith
They will feed into existing pipelines. The main pipeline is inspected constantly and does need repair sometimes. The feed lines from ANWR will be new. At the same time there is the new Natural Gas Pipeline nearly ready to begin construction so they will have to work around each other.
8
posted on
03/10/2006 7:34:18 PM PST
by
RightWhale
(pas de lieu, Rhone que nous)
To: NormsRevenge
This is clearly Cheney's fault for having ties to Haliburton and therefore Bush's fault for having ties to Cheney.
End of sarcasm
9
posted on
03/10/2006 7:35:50 PM PST
by
COEXERJ145
(Real Leaders Base Their Decisions on Their Convictions. Wannabes Base Decisions on the Latest Poll.)
To: NormsRevenge
Here's the most graphic published photograph of the leak in question:
10
posted on
03/10/2006 7:40:46 PM PST
by
bnelson44
(Proud parent of a tanker! (Charlie Mike, son))
To: bnelson44
It was 50 below when they were trying to deal with this, windchill included. At least they have daylight.
11
posted on
03/10/2006 7:42:09 PM PST
by
RightWhale
(pas de lieu, Rhone que nous)
To: NormsRevenge
Crude oil prices are listed in dollars per BARREL, but oil spill quantities are listed in more numerous and ominous GALLONS. Anyone know why that might be???
12
posted on
03/10/2006 7:42:57 PM PST
by
DancesWithBolsheviks
(No guestworkers while able bodied and sane people are on our welfare rolls.)
To: bnelson44
Here's the most graphic published photograph of the leak in question:
Ooohhhh the cariboooouuuity!
13
posted on
03/10/2006 7:44:49 PM PST
by
DancesWithBolsheviks
(No guestworkers while able bodied and sane people are on our welfare rolls.)
To: NormsRevenge
You know--this is kind of like when some crazy starts shooting up innocent folks - it kind of puts a crimper on gun rights work...
Well, this oil spill isn't helping the cause of drilling in ANWR....
14
posted on
03/10/2006 7:45:25 PM PST
by
TheBattman
(Islam (and liberalism)- the cult of Satan and a Cancer on Society)
To: DancesWithBolsheviks
This facility pumps 100,000 barrels per day. A barrel is 42 gallons. This spill is minor by comparison. The reason they report spills in gallons is for PC impact.
15
posted on
03/10/2006 7:52:06 PM PST
by
umgud
(gitrdun)
To: RightWhale
yup, I understand the Alaskan pipeline is wearing out, from corrosion. It probably needs to be replaced.
16
posted on
03/10/2006 8:03:42 PM PST
by
FBD
(surf's up....way up!)
To: FBD
30 years is beyond the original lifetime design. Prudhoe was supposed to run about 20 years, but it just keeps producing--about half the rate.
17
posted on
03/10/2006 8:07:50 PM PST
by
RightWhale
(pas de lieu, Rhone que nous)
To: RightWhale
They do quite a bit of preventative maintenance on the pipeline. X-ray the welds of interior pipe sections for corrosion that occur with age.
18
posted on
03/10/2006 8:07:58 PM PST
by
Eska
To: RightWhale
Is there any talk of building new pipelines?
btw, I recall watching a documentary on the AP, and I recall them predicting that the Alaskan pipeline would start to fail, because of corrosion, etc.
Is that because that oil has a high sulfur content or something?
19
posted on
03/10/2006 8:09:37 PM PST
by
FBD
(surf's up....way up!)
To: FBD
ANS crude is high sulfur and has some acids that must be delt with.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-62 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson