Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The New Protectionists
opinionjournal ^ | March 10, 2006 | WSJ

Posted on 03/10/2006 12:33:17 PM PST by groanup

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 521-540541-560561-580581-590 last
To: Toddsterpatriot
Does their purchase of Treasury debt allow higher government spending?

A'hem. Not a good thing.

Whose side are you arguing for again?

581 posted on 03/21/2006 12:45:16 PM PST by Paul Ross (Hitting bullets with bullets successfully for 35 years!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 580 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross
A'hem. Not a good thing.

Did I say it was? We're talking about GDP and how it's calculated. Math is involved. Over your head.

582 posted on 03/21/2006 12:47:26 PM PST by Toddsterpatriot (Why are protectionists so bad at math?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 581 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot
Did I say it was?

From the context, you do imply that. English. Must be over your head.

583 posted on 03/21/2006 12:49:17 PM PST by Paul Ross (Hitting bullets with bullets successfully for 35 years!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 582 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross
English. Must be over your head.

So says the guy who doesn't understand the difference between foreign currency and US Treasuries.

584 posted on 03/21/2006 12:50:36 PM PST by Toddsterpatriot (Why are protectionists so bad at math?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 583 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross
The capital flow issue? What issue? you contradicted your own source.

Are you deliberately lying or are you so dense that you're not aware of that which you speak-th? Mankiw's text was the source of my understanding of the NX = NCO ( and, by logical extension - but only to some, I gather, the net imports = net capital inflow) identity(ies).

585 posted on 03/21/2006 5:34:00 PM PST by LowCountryJoe (I'm a Paleo-liberal: I believe in freedom; am socially independent and a borderline fiscal anarchist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 579 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot
GDP = Consumption + Domestic Investment + Governmental Spending + Net Exports

well that's one way to calc GDP. However you can calc GDP this way too: GDP=Consumer spending(C)+Industrial spending(I)+governmental spending(G)+net exports so taking this view. The outsourcing of jobs decreases C because less jobs means less consumer spending by those who lose their jobs which usually takes years to show up due to additional sources of income that consumers can tap(i.e unemployment benefits, home lines of credit, family, other government benefits, etc). Outsourcing also decreases I because the companies are spending the money in China and India building infrastructure instead of within this country. It does increase G because governments have to spend more on food stamps, welfare benefits, unemployment costs, reeducation costs etc. While at the same time decreasing the tax base therefore we see the increase in federal deficits. Outsourcing also decreases net exports because we now have to import what we use to make. So in what way is outsourcing good. The only way outsourcing is good is to company profits which after buying off Congress with 100 million tax breaks most of those profits do not find their way into the general American population because outsourcing also depresses wages her at home. And outsourcing can be tied DIRECTLY to Free trade because if it was not for the elimination of tariffs companies would not have a profit motive to outsource their jobs.
586 posted on 03/22/2006 3:04:59 AM PST by unseen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 580 | View Replies]

To: unseen
GDP=Consumer spending(C)+Industrial spending(I)+governmental spending(G)+net exports

Where is investment in your formula?

587 posted on 03/22/2006 6:52:46 AM PST by Toddsterpatriot (Why are protectionists so bad at math?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 586 | View Replies]

To: LowCountryJoe
You contradict Mankiw's explicit axiomatic conclusions, and his charts. So it is you who are apparently "lying".

Why do you think I found your finally, at long last producing one source... to be so rewarding...but not to you. It exposes your hyperventilating contentions for what they are to the opponents of your twaddle...gross misunderstasnding and misconstrual on your part.

No wonder you seldom if ever try to produce support for your poppycock. Your own sources contradict you!

588 posted on 03/22/2006 9:57:33 AM PST by Paul Ross (Hitting bullets with bullets successfully for 35 years!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 585 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross
Okay, then...answering those two "true/false" question should be a piece of cake. I'm looking forward to it - you gathering the necessary spine, that is.
589 posted on 03/22/2006 5:40:58 PM PST by LowCountryJoe (I'm a Paleo-liberal: I believe in freedom; am socially independent and a borderline fiscal anarchist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 588 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross

pinging once again because you managed to dodge the majority of it the first time around: big surprise there.


590 posted on 03/22/2006 5:49:59 PM PST by LowCountryJoe (I'm a Paleo-liberal: I believe in freedom; am socially independent and a borderline fiscal anarchist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 528 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 521-540541-560561-580581-590 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson