Skip to comments.
Khrushchev’s secret speech and end of communism
Daily Times ^
| 3/5/06
| Roy A Medvedev
Posted on 03/05/2006 6:39:16 PM PST by voletti
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 next last
1
posted on
03/05/2006 6:39:19 PM PST
by
voletti
To: voletti
The system was dead already"No, it's alive and well. It has merely transported itself from the USSR to universities across Europe and America, a entire new culture to breed on and corrode.....
2
posted on
03/05/2006 6:45:38 PM PST
by
ScreamingFist
(Annihilation - The result of underestimating your enemies. NRA)
To: ScreamingFist
"No, it's alive and well. It has merely transported itself from the USSR to universities across Europe and America, a entire new culture to breed on and corrode....."
You got that right - and look at the crap they are going to ordain at the Oscars tonite.
3
posted on
03/05/2006 6:50:37 PM PST
by
spanalot
To: voletti
"secret speech"That's a borderline oxymoron.
I guess the audio crew for the speech turns the volume on the amplifier down to "secret" level where only the first three rows can hear it.
4
posted on
03/05/2006 6:51:33 PM PST
by
capt. norm
(Error: Keyboard not attached. Press F1 to continue)
To: voletti
There are so many theories on when Communism really died as an ideal in the Soviet Union. One theory was that when Stalin needed to defeat the Nazis he reached back to patriotic reasons. Instead of fighting for Communism and the Party, the they were fighting for the Rodina.
In a sense Communism under Stalin became a methodology of enforcing his will on the population. Central Planning and Communist philosophy made it easier to control the people. Khrushchev and later Gorbachev tried to reform Communism, and failed because the system failed. The economic system was designed to extinguish individualism and initiative. To the extent it was successful, the economy collapsed. While Gorbachev loosed the bonds with the Soviet satellite states, the desire for freedom overcame the fear of repression. Of course by then any idealism that remained was history.
Unfortunately, there are still too many people around the world that believe in state control of the economy and the government redistributing massive amounts of wealth. Most of those people in our country reside in our Universities, as stated by Solzhenitsyn some years ago.
To: ScreamingFist
To this day the Marxists professors deny that Stalinism was (a) as evil as Hiterism and (2) that socialism is anything more than state capitalism.
6
posted on
03/05/2006 6:53:34 PM PST
by
RobbyS
( CHIRHO)
To: RobbyS
***To this day the Marxists professors deny that Stalinism was (a) as evil as Hiterism and (2) that socialism is anything more than state capitalism.***
"State Capitalism".....that one always made me laugh.
Capitalism always seeks to maximize efficiency.
Government always seeks to minimize efficiency.
How can the two be deeply intertwined like Communism promotes? =P
7
posted on
03/05/2006 7:00:03 PM PST
by
Zeppelin
(Texas Longhorns === National Champions !!!)
To: GeorgefromGeorgia
True. Ultimately communism carried the seeds of its destruction within its own DNA. My hope is islam too carried within itself the seeds of its own destruction. Like the sci-fi whackos would say "Initiating irreversible self destruct sequence...10...9..."
8
posted on
03/05/2006 7:14:00 PM PST
by
voletti
(Awareness and Equanimity.)
To: Zeppelin
State-capitalism aimply means that the state allocates capital--with all the recent efficiency of General Motors.
9
posted on
03/05/2006 7:16:45 PM PST
by
RobbyS
( CHIRHO)
To: voletti
The use of suicide bombers is a sign of failure. The Japanese used Kamikazes to bleed our forces and force us into a negotiated settlement. The Islamic radicals are hoping to do the same. If we truly have the will to persevere, their demise is certain. The Islamic world will get tired of the failed policy. The real war is with our Media and the hearts and minds of the American People.
To: Bookmaestro
commies killed 100+ million.
11
posted on
03/05/2006 7:21:28 PM PST
by
fooman
(Get real with Kim Jung Mentally Ill about proliferation)
To: spanalot
It was the communist infiltration of Hollywood during Ronald Reagan's tenure as head of the Screen Actors Guild that awakened him to the red menace goal of propagandizing from our entertainment venues.
I'm sure Reagan would be stunned to see how successful the anti-American, pro socialist elites in Hollywood and New York have become today.
These traitorous useful idiots will be on parade in full regalia tonight.
To: voletti
So, although it is common today in Russia to blame Gorbachev and Boris Yeltsin for the collapse of the USSR, it is both useless and unfair to do so. I blame Ronald Reagan.
13
posted on
03/05/2006 7:33:54 PM PST
by
Moonman62
(Federal creed: If it moves tax it. If it keeps moving regulate it. If it stops moving subsidize it)
To: voletti
Groan. So now we have Krushchevist-revisionism?
14
posted on
03/05/2006 7:34:48 PM PST
by
fat city
("Journalists are sloppy, lazy and on expense account")
To: Tail Gunner John
It has always amazed me how communism has appealed to so many well-educated people. If you read about communists and communist sympathizers in the government during the 1930s and 1940s, many were Ivy League graduates.
15
posted on
03/05/2006 7:39:33 PM PST
by
BW2221
To: Tail Gunner John
I don't think it would surprise him at all. One of the reasons Reagan became head of the Screen Actors Guild was because of the heavy influence of communists in Hollywood.
Remember, one of the major reasons Hollywood support the WWII effort was because the Soviet Union was our ally.
16
posted on
03/05/2006 7:42:49 PM PST
by
BW2221
To: voletti
17
posted on
03/05/2006 7:49:31 PM PST
by
Paperdoll
(On the cutting edge)
To: BW2221
Apparently Communism has a certain intellectual appeal. Unfortunately, sometimes the higher the intellect, the lower the common sense. Believe me.
18
posted on
03/05/2006 7:52:17 PM PST
by
Paperdoll
(On the cutting edge)
To: BW2221
When you read "Witness" by Whittaker Chambers it is amazing to find that these are the same people with the same education, with the same pedigree, using the same play book now as then.
To: voletti
Sounds like lots of interesting intrigue - maybe enough to make, say a movie. Hmm, wonder if Hollyweird would be interested?
20
posted on
03/05/2006 7:56:23 PM PST
by
tang-soo
(Prophecy of the Seventy Weeks - Read Daniel Chapter 9)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson