Posted on 03/01/2006 9:49:07 PM PST by NormsRevenge
At your invitation I visited your website.
Putting this as humanely as possible Dear old Lone-doggie: There's no "there" there.
Then again, maybe all obsessive/compulsive types should be given websites. Has the same effect as "Corporate Advertising"...which is said to be like peeing on oneself in a Navy Blue Suit. You feel warm all over briefly and no one actually seems to notice.
With all your wacky energy why not go out and do good works?
Help the poor and down trodden...
Middle School Geography teachers and the like?
All of us are going to start a prayer vigil for you Lone.
He lost that. I would have done the same thing. Lots of innocent people who have no desire to have their names surface get caught up in these wholesale releases of records.
Better to be thought of as ignorant than to rush out to prove it, as you have done.
If that is the case, then open borders is a poor stategy for Rome to follow. About 40% of Mexican Hispanics when they move to the US become Protestants (mostly Evangelicals) within a generation. So by moving the Catholic "pawns" around on the chess board, Rome suffers a net loss of pawns. Back to the drawinig board.
What is ignorant is your defending a church leader who wants to destroy the nation in which he plays church. get real.
Ok, lets assume you are right and I am wrong. So why is it then that mahoney as a leader of the catholic church disrespects the laws in the nation where he plays church? Bet you wont post a clear honest answer.
I'm not a Catholic (in fact I'm am a near atheistic cultural WASP), but I think that religion takes very seriously the admonition of Christ about matters of charity, and helping those in need. Thus, a law requiring them to ask for paper before rendering aid, offends its sensibilities. Just a guess.
Your response is fair enough, thank you. As a counter I would say this, when such egregious abuse of charity is done on an hourly basis, does not the govt have the right to set some ground rules in the nation that it rules? If one is of a religious bent, Christian in particular, doesnt God say that he forms whatever countries he wants and does he not further say, give to Caesar what is Caesars? I think we can safely say, God meant you also have to obey the laws of a nation, is that fair? Now you have a very high churchman saying he will not obey the law. Btw, what laws will you not obey? How about I dont obey the laws I dont like, is that also ok with you? This alledged servant of God is in clear violation of Gods teachings. This is not even a case where interpretation can be mixed, it is the law, made by congress, it is legitimate anyway you look at it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.