Posted on 02/27/2006 12:12:47 PM PST by dmz
They're just keeping the charges on the other murders in reserve, in case the first conviction were to be overturned on a technicality. Since there is no statute of limitations on murder, I don't see a problem.
There is a difference between no statute of limitations when you can't yet identify the prep vs. an accused's right to a speedy trial once you have all the evidence needed to charge and prosecute the 'alleged' perp.
She's faking it.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1584661/posts
Execute her.
I agree, the guy is a worthless human being. But he did not kill those kids, she did!
Mental Illness (and post partum depression is a form of mental illness) can be the cause for violence and crime. But in our society, it is never going to be accepted as an excuse for violence and crime; and particularly not as an excuse for killing children. The irony in all this is our society would be more willing to accept her being mentally ill and killing her ex-husband, than it is for her being mentally ill and killing her children.
I hope Andrea Yates is locked up in a prison cell for the rest of her miserable life. She will never be executed because whether she is mentally ill or not, a jury will take that possibility into account.
Finally tell me this...just who has something bad wrong with them....her worthless ex-husband....or a woman, knowing this jerk's past history, who would marry and have children with him?
Please understand, I am not trying to excuse her by including him. But I find him equally morally guilty. If a toddler gets out of the house and is hit by a car because a parent is drunk, asleep, on the phone etc, is that parent responsible for the death? Of course they are, they failed to protect the child. Rusty Yates failed to protect his children from their obviously insane mother. Nothing is going to happen to him I realize.
Why should I have to decided which one is sick, Rusty Yates or the woman who is marrying him knowing full well what happened in his last marriage? They are both sick, it's not an either or question.
With that said, she should be locked up in an institution for the rest of her life.
But here is the question. Do you believe that some cases of mental illness are so severe that the person suffering from it is rendered incompetent and unable to make logical, moral and otherwise appropriate decisions regarding their behavior? Or not?
What I will never understand is the justice system taking "insane" people and drugging them up so they can try them as competent individuals after the fact.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.