Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

So Georgies FIRST VETO is going to be THIS???

WTH is WRONG with him?

1 posted on 02/21/2006 3:26:06 PM PST by bikepacker67
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last
To: bikepacker67

Well, I'll say this for the Bush family - when they're bought they stay bought.

Dubya's relationship with the Arabs (and the Mexicans for that matter) is a national embarassment.


53 posted on 02/21/2006 4:15:16 PM PST by surely_you_jest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bikepacker67

Bush? Veto? Don't make me laugh.


57 posted on 02/21/2006 4:30:12 PM PST by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bikepacker67

What's the big deal about turning our ports over to the Abu Dubies? We've already turned over the rest of the country to the illegal aliens.


59 posted on 02/21/2006 4:30:38 PM PST by oldbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bikepacker67

Wow, he is really losing me with this. Sitting out 2006 looks more and more likely.


62 posted on 02/21/2006 4:32:30 PM PST by faithincowboys
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bikepacker67
WTH is WRONG with him?

He's a "free trader" and a communitarian.
66 posted on 02/21/2006 4:40:25 PM PST by hedgetrimmer ("I'm a millionaire thanks to the WTO and "free trade" system--Hu Jintao top 10 worst dictators)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bikepacker67

Criminy!!! Sometimes it's hard to be a Bush supporter. He signs Campaign Finance Reform and threatens to veto THIS! Sometimes I wonder...Bush really has a huge blind spot when it comes to islam. I've argued with others who claim that Bush is making excuses for the Saudis because they're family friends...now I wonder.


84 posted on 02/21/2006 6:13:05 PM PST by pgkdan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bikepacker67
After reading a couple of the threads and thinking about things a bit I would propose as an educated guess the following:

1) The US is considering plans to invade or bomb Iran if negotiations fail.

2) If that were to occur the second worse thing that could occur (the first being Iranian use of a nuclear device) would be if the Iranians could successfully prevent oil tankers from going through the Straits of Hormuz. The removal of 13 million barrels of day from the world markets would be quite a shock to the world economies.

As can be seen from this graphic, UAE along with part of Oman is on one side of the Straits if Hormuz. Iran is on the other.

My guess is that we would benefit by having access to fields on UAE and likely Oman as well to support our ships trying to keep the strait safe for oil tankers in the event of conflict, perhaps for additional landing fields for planes and/or for antimissile batteries.

Though I don't think a deal was ever present (port control for bases) if the port deal doesn't go through the UAE government may be unwilling to allow the US to make use of UAE soil in the event of conflict with Iran. Certainly UAE would be making itself a potential target. Perhaps the potential for refusal has been privately communicated to the Bush administration by the UAE government.

86 posted on 02/21/2006 8:01:54 PM PST by NYorkerInHouston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson