Skip to comments.
Pennsylvania Senate: Santorum Still Way Behind (bad news alert)
Rasmussen Reports ^
| February 20, 2006
Posted on 02/20/2006 6:19:53 PM PST by Clintonfatigued
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-74 next last
To: Clintonfatigued
Stick a fork in him, he is done.
To: Clintonfatigued
Rick's got some serious work to do. The silver lining in the cloud is he has (as of earlier this week) about $10 mil to Casey's $6 mil.
3
posted on
02/20/2006 6:24:36 PM PST
by
Coop
(FR = a lotta talk, but little action)
To: AuH2ORepublican; fieldmarshaldj; Kuksool; zbigreddogz; JohnnyZ; Galactic Overlord-In-Chief; ...
If the Democrats had nominated someone more liberal and less popular than Bob Casey, Rick Santorum would be running stronger. That being said, the results of this poll are not encouraging.
I think that Casey's endorsement of Sam Alito turned out to be a plus for him. It helped him distance himself from his party's liberal leadership (Hillary Clinton, Ted Kennedy, John Kerry, ect.).
4
posted on
02/20/2006 6:28:22 PM PST
by
Clintonfatigued
(Bob Taft for Impeachment)
Comment #5 Removed by Moderator
To: Clintonfatigued
I think Santorum picked up a few points since his last poll.
6
posted on
02/20/2006 6:36:03 PM PST
by
demlosers
(Kerry: "Impeach Bush, filibuster Alito, withdraw from Iraq, send U235 to Iran, elect me President!")
To: Clintonfatigued
I don't know why any self-respecting pro-lifer would vote for Casey. He would vote for Hillary's pro-abortion Supreme Court nominees in a heartbeat, and that's the one and only influence that a Senator has over abortion.
7
posted on
02/20/2006 6:40:08 PM PST
by
Brilliant
To: Clintonfatigued
Doesn't look good. That's a huge lead.
8
posted on
02/20/2006 6:42:54 PM PST
by
Dog Gone
To: Brilliant
Bob Casey helped himself by endorsing Sam Alito for the Supreme Court.
9
posted on
02/20/2006 6:45:57 PM PST
by
Clintonfatigued
(Bob Taft for Impeachment)
To: Clintonfatigued
Don't worry, we still have the Spector.
Sarcasm off!
10
posted on
02/20/2006 6:46:30 PM PST
by
montomike
(If you didn't find this funny and were offended...have a riot.)
To: Clintonfatigued
When Karl Rove forced Santorum to endorse Arlen Specter, he really, really, really screwed up.
My own view is that everyone is entitled to one mistake, even a bad one, and that it would be truly stupid not to vote for Santorum for that one mistake.
And much as I despise Arlen Specter, he did get Roberts and Alito through the process.
11
posted on
02/20/2006 6:46:55 PM PST
by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: Dog Gone; Clintonfatigued; fieldmarshaldj; AuH2ORepublican
The last incumbent I remember seeing with numbers like this was Rod Grams of MN. He ultimately lost 49-43%. I think Santorum's in a bit better shape, being the #3 GOP Senate guy. But the situation looks similar - a conservative Pubbie running in a left-of-center swing state. Rick's fundraising still looks good, so apparently the "players" aren't writing him off yet. He's got a lot of time to make up ground, but I would not want to be an incumbent in this position. Ugh.
Chuck Robb of VA was in a similar position (Dem in a right-of-center state), trailing Allen by a ton early on. Robb eventually closed to within a point or two before ultimately losing by about five, IIRC.
12
posted on
02/20/2006 6:49:18 PM PST
by
Coop
(FR = a lotta talk, but little action)
To: Brilliant
In our society, gay marriage is a cold, and abortion is a cancer. If they could introduce an amendment banning gay marriage then they could introduce an amendment protecting the Unborn. Sure it would fail, but at least we'd know who's really on our side.
All this talk about SC is nonsense, we are trying to take the same shortcuts as the liberals. Can't convince Joe voter, have some slick talking lawyer impress a judge. Don't have a slick talking lawyer, replace the judge.
To: GeorgefromGeorgia
let me the first to call u mr president, said to john kerry election night based on the polls
14
posted on
02/20/2006 6:50:44 PM PST
by
italianquaker
(Democrats and media can't win elections at least they can win their phony polls.)
To: demlosers
I think Santorum picked up a few points since his last poll.
Not in the Rasmussen poll. He's lost one point since the last poll.
15
posted on
02/20/2006 6:50:54 PM PST
by
drjimmy
To: Brilliant
Casey is most likely a cryptic liberal.
16
posted on
02/20/2006 6:52:44 PM PST
by
demlosers
(Kerry: "Impeach Bush, filibuster Alito, withdraw from Iraq, send U235 to Iran, elect me President!")
To: Hong Kong Expat
All this talk about SC is nonsense, we are trying to take the same shortcuts as the liberals. That's garbage.
17
posted on
02/20/2006 6:53:59 PM PST
by
Coop
(FR = a lotta talk, but little action)
To: Coop
A lot can happen between now and November, both domestically and internationally to affect this race.
But I wouldn't want to be banking on external events to secure re-election. I think he's in the most trouble of any GOP incumbent.
18
posted on
02/20/2006 6:54:09 PM PST
by
Dog Gone
To: Clintonfatigued
The backing of Specter is what has done him in, so far.
Where is Santorum's leadership on the day-to-day issues? He hasn't spoken up about illegal immigration, about free speech re: the Muslims rioting over cartoons, not even about the obvious vote fraud in Philly.
19
posted on
02/20/2006 6:54:51 PM PST
by
ikka
To: Dog Gone
20
posted on
02/20/2006 6:56:05 PM PST
by
Coop
(FR = a lotta talk, but little action)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-74 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson