Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Chertoff Defends Review of Ports Takeover
Yahoo News ^ | FEB.19, 2006 | WILL LESTER

Posted on 02/19/2006 8:44:08 AM PST by radar101

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-187 last
To: oceanview

Frankly, I don't believe that "getting killed on this issue" is a good reason not to adopt some policy. By that reasoning we ought to pull out of Iraq right now, cuz we're sure getting killed on that issue.

I don't think President Bush should cater to people's ignorance and bigotry when determining what policy to follow. But as I said before, if someone can suggest a serious reason why the company in question shouldn't get the contract, then I'd love to read it. "What was Bush thinking?" doesn't cut it.


181 posted on 02/20/2006 7:47:46 PM PST by zook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: zook

no, there are plenty of reasonable, positive voices out there regarding iraq. there is so such positive message available on why this UAE port deal should go through. none.


182 posted on 02/20/2006 7:55:22 PM PST by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies]

To: oceanview

President Bush and his advisors. I count them. And sans any solid argument, I discount the views of those who have to run for re-election every two or six years and see this as a way of making political hay. And other than saying it's bad politics, you still haven't provided a good argument against the deal. If the UAE company doesn't get the deal, it'll most likely be a firm from Hong Kong or Singapore. I can't see how either is necessarily better than UAE.


183 posted on 02/20/2006 8:01:23 PM PST by zook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: zook

the security concerns are the basis for the opposition. you refuse to believe those are even possible, so what's to talk about.


184 posted on 02/20/2006 8:05:28 PM PST by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

To: oceanview

That's simply too vague. There are security issues with any company and there's no reason to believe that they're more acute with a UAE company--unless one simply doesn't trust Arab people. Numerous posters have suggested logical reasons why we are not at increased risk if we go with a UAE company.

So, given quite a few chances, you've failed to offer anything concrete. Maybe someone will think of something tomorrow, but for now I trust that the President and his people have explored this thing pretty thoroughly, just as carefully as they explored the need to move on Iraq.


185 posted on 02/20/2006 8:10:40 PM PST by zook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

The fact is that this port deal is a big political loser for the Republicans. I think that most of the country, the vast majority, the sheeple are opposed to this. It doesn't make any difference if the Arab company is thoroughly vetted. KILL THE DEAL, it will only hurt Republicans if we let it go through.


186 posted on 02/20/2006 8:17:52 PM PST by lmr (You can have my Tactical Nuclear Weapons when you pry them from my cold dead fingers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: radar101

Chertoff is playing his end-game.


187 posted on 02/21/2006 3:09:32 PM PST by Rapscallion (Democrats: Supporting the conquest of America since VietNam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-187 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson