Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Circumcision battle lands parents of eight-year-old in US court
AFP ^ | 18 Feb 2006 | AFP

Posted on 02/18/2006 6:34:25 PM PST by dpa5923

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 421-436 next last
To: Rytwyng

Sandbar is right. The decision not to circumcize is huge amongst the birkenstock wearing, no leg shaving vegan crowd.


201 posted on 02/18/2006 8:02:42 PM PST by Melas (What!? Read or learn something? Why would anyone do that, when they can just go on being stupid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: ahayes

Paul also said that women were less than men. Not too fond of that apostle.


202 posted on 02/18/2006 8:03:08 PM PST by sandbar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv

Actually this article is even vaguer than the first. Is the procedure to prevent further infections or just possible infections? Is the child pre-disposed to a certain type of infection? I would still like to hear the doctor's testimony.


203 posted on 02/18/2006 8:08:03 PM PST by dpa5923 (Small minds talk about people, normal minds talk about events, great minds talk about ideas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: sandbar
someone who did NOT read the article to see that it was medical

I read the article; I just don't believe the mom's story.

204 posted on 02/18/2006 8:09:06 PM PST by Sandy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]

To: Rytwyng
Then why did God repeal circumicision in the days of the early Church?

Repeal means interdiction, therefore my point...do not mess with human body, as GOD intended to be.

As a side bar, how did GOD repealed the circumcisions and thru "WHO".

205 posted on 02/18/2006 8:09:43 PM PST by danmar ("Reason obeys itself,and ignorance submits to whatever is dictated to it....... Thomas Paine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: trashcanbred
If he is a baby that is fine I have no problem with that. But at eight years old

I'm an RN and it is actually done at various ages for various reasons. When it's a younger boy, such as the above, typically it's done due to phimosis, a condition in which the foreskin never retracted like it should have as the infant boy gets older. Normally, for older men, it's done for cosmetic reasons. Either way, they are ALL performed under general anethesia. Our OR schedule typically has 1-2 scheduled per week.

206 posted on 02/18/2006 8:09:44 PM PST by RepubMommy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: ahayes

Bookmark and bump to all that!


207 posted on 02/18/2006 8:10:12 PM PST by Squeako (ACLU: "Only Christians, Boy Scouts and War Memorials are too vile to defend.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies]

To: dpa5923

I would still like to hear the doctor's testimony as well, but it would take a genuine "necessity" to change my mind, and this sure doesn't sound like one. If this is in fact a persistent problem, then teach the kid to clean himself. Billions of men have seemed to grasp the concept well enough over the millennia.....


208 posted on 02/18/2006 8:10:19 PM PST by AntiGuv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies]

To: Rytwyng
Lots of other parents just like me -- Christians, conservatives, etc -- are rejecting the procedure which was done to us, as unnecessary for our kids.

And lots aren't. From what I've read thus far, you seem to be highly offended that other parents are making or have made different choices than you've made.

209 posted on 02/18/2006 8:10:46 PM PST by Melas (What!? Read or learn something? Why would anyone do that, when they can just go on being stupid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: Chiapet; dpa5923; AntiGuv

Wow, it's amazing how people pick and choose what they want to support their position.

Hmmm, seems that THIS articles states at the age of three, he had two infections that left him swollen and in pain. As well as painful urination. Of course to hear AntiGov's article tell it, it's all preventative.
http://www.cirp.org/news/star-ledger12-03-00/


210 posted on 02/18/2006 8:11:00 PM PST by sandbar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies]

To: Arpege92
Yes, I agree eight years old is a little late, which is why I asked if they numb the area

See my previous post, it's performed under general anesthesia if the patient is not an infant.

211 posted on 02/18/2006 8:11:06 PM PST by RepubMommy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: dpa5923

No, I'm a Gentile, really. I've got hard evidence, right here in my lap. :-)


212 posted on 02/18/2006 8:11:19 PM PST by Hardastarboard (HEY - Billy Joe! You ARE an American Idiot!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Toto_for_breakfast
Paul isn't telling them to NOT get circumsized in this Scripture. The preceding verses reveal that Paul is talking about those who are circumcised that are not "walking the talk", IOW they consider the circumcision procedure as their salvation. (vs 12). These circumcised individuals are prompting others to be circumcised so that they can boast about it. (vs l3) Paul is admonishing the reader to boast only in the cross of Jesus Christ. (vs l4) ((What matters is the condition of your heart, not your p#nis.))
213 posted on 02/18/2006 8:13:20 PM PST by Reddy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]

To: sandbar

That's a kind of mind-boggling response. . . You seemed pretty gung-ho about the standards of Christianity in your earlier post. So shall we just edit out the Pauline epistles from Christian doctrine because you don't like him?

The fact is that under the New Covenant Christians are not required to be circumcised, and it was rather actively discouraged in the early church.


214 posted on 02/18/2006 8:13:37 PM PST by ahayes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies]

To: sandbar
Personally, as a woman, I do not like an uncircumsized one and I don't care what the current trend, I know NOT ONE woman who disagrees with me. They'll of course except it in the man they love, but prefer cut.

Having just had a baby and bring a participant in pregnancy message boards, this is a huge hot topic subject. The anti crowd will swear the sex is better with an "intact" penis as they like to call it ( as if a circ'ed penis is not intact to the body?) Personally speaking, I am with you. :) I am also the mom of three girls, so this was a moot point in those debates.

215 posted on 02/18/2006 8:14:28 PM PST by RepubMommy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: dpa5923

BTW, that article link wasn't TO you as far as disagreeing with you. I just wanted to include you in the info since Cha Cha Chiapet decided to link you a vague article.


216 posted on 02/18/2006 8:14:44 PM PST by sandbar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies]

To: sandbar

Is this the same kid?


217 posted on 02/18/2006 8:15:05 PM PST by dpa5923 (Small minds talk about people, normal minds talk about events, great minds talk about ideas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv
I would still like to hear the doctor's testimony as well, but it would take a genuine "necessity" to change my mind, and this sure doesn't sound like one. If this is in fact a persistent problem, then teach the kid to clean himself. Billions of men have seemed to grasp the concept well enough over the millennia.....

You know, it's entirely possible that the problems is simply that the boy lives with his mother instead of his dad, and she is either unable, unwilling, or just to darn uncomfortable with the topic to teach him to clean himself properly.

218 posted on 02/18/2006 8:15:34 PM PST by Chiapet (As a well-spent day brings happy sleep, so a life well-spent brings happy death. -Da Vinci)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies]

To: sandbar; Chiapet; dpa5923

You do realize how stunningly ridiculous you look, don't you sandbar, that the link you just posted is to a different case in NJ and not to the IL case we've been discussing in this thread?


219 posted on 02/18/2006 8:16:13 PM PST by AntiGuv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies]

To: OKIEDOC

Heh, thanks =-)


220 posted on 02/18/2006 8:16:34 PM PST by Dr.Zoidberg (Mohammedism - Bringing you only the best of the 6th century for fourteen hundred years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 421-436 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson