Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rumors of a Third Nominee to the Supreme Court
The National Ledger ^ | February 17, 2006 | Paul M. Weyrich

Posted on 02/17/2006 7:35:37 PM PST by new yorker 77

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-106 next last

1 posted on 02/17/2006 7:35:39 PM PST by new yorker 77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77; wagglebee; neverdem; mdittmar; Howlin; Blood of Tyrants; SmithL; Dane; ken5050; ...

This would be an awesome developement. The $1 million question is who will retire and who will be chosen to fill the vacancy.


2 posted on 02/17/2006 7:40:38 PM PST by Clintonfatigued (Bob Taft for Impeachment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77

This is going to be fun...:-)


3 posted on 02/17/2006 7:41:15 PM PST by Tarkin (Roberts, Scalia, Thomas, Alito...one more to go)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #4 Removed by Moderator

To: Clintonfatigued

neither stevens or ginsburg will retire, they will be kept alive by machines and feeding tubes if necessary.


5 posted on 02/17/2006 7:42:02 PM PST by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77
If, as many now believe, the Democrats take over the Senate this November

"Experts" also believed Gore would defeat BUSH, Kerry would defeat BUSH, The GOP would lose seats during the midterm 2002 elections...yada yada yada...

6 posted on 02/17/2006 7:43:06 PM PST by frogjerk (LIBERALISM: The perpetual insulting of common sense.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

Stevens is going to retire (he is after all a 120-year old Republican). Let's just hope that he decides to retire after 2005/2006 term.


7 posted on 02/17/2006 7:43:10 PM PST by Tarkin (Roberts, Scalia, Thomas, Alito...one more to go)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ninian Dryhope

Not funny.


8 posted on 02/17/2006 7:43:35 PM PST by COEXERJ145 (Pat Buchanan lost a family member in the holocaust. The man fell out of a guard tower.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued
Stevens supposedly told the White House that even though he is a Rockefeller Republican (he was President Gerald R. Ford’s only Court appointee during the period when Nelson A. Rockefeller was Vice President) he believes the Court would not move radically to the right should he depart.

This indicates to me that Stevens is probably somewhat senile; on the other hand, Bush should go along with him and then as soon as he retires, appoint another strict constructionist.

9 posted on 02/17/2006 7:44:18 PM PST by wagglebee ("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77

"The Majority Leader also made it clear that he would not tolerate a filibuster of such a nominee and would exercise the so-called Constitutional Option if Senators insisted upon trying to block an up-or-down vote by a simple majority."

Yeah right!


10 posted on 02/17/2006 7:44:42 PM PST by floridavoter2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77

Thanks for the downer, Mr. Weyrich. (/sarc.)


11 posted on 02/17/2006 7:45:15 PM PST by nightdriver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: frogjerk

The Democrats need a 6 seat shift to retake the Senate.

The Dems will lose a net 1 seat.


12 posted on 02/17/2006 7:45:24 PM PST by new yorker 77 (Conservatives who eat their own are a liberal's best friend.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Ninian Dryhope; dubyaismypresident; MikeinIraq; RockinRight; oceanview; Alberta's Child; ...

That's a scary thought.


13 posted on 02/17/2006 7:45:43 PM PST by Clintonfatigued (Bob Taft for Impeachment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77
Gonzales wold be Bush's next pick if a liberal were to step down.
14 posted on 02/17/2006 7:45:57 PM PST by Mike Darancette (Condimaniac)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77
Janice

Rogers

Brown

15 posted on 02/17/2006 7:47:33 PM PST by SW6906 (5 things you can't have too much of: sex, money, firewood, guns and ammunition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee; new yorker 77

That's a great idea. My choice to succeed John Paul Stevens would be former Assistant Attorney General Viet Dihn.


16 posted on 02/17/2006 7:47:58 PM PST by Clintonfatigued (Bob Taft for Impeachment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: oceanview
neither stevens or ginsburg will retire, they will be kept alive by machines and feeding tubes if necessary.

Ginsburg's IV will require a cauldron of ingredients including eye of newt, bat ears, snake venom, and the anal drippings of a donkey's @ss.

17 posted on 02/17/2006 7:48:22 PM PST by F16Fighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77
The far left now so controls the Democratic Party that it is in a position to make demands of even its senior Senators.

That's what is making politics so much fun right now. It's a blast just watching the Democrats obeying the marching orders from their kook fringe. Even old timey politicians like Ted Kennedy have to "dance to their music".

They could start a new TV show called "America's Funniest Liberals".

18 posted on 02/17/2006 7:49:25 PM PST by capt. norm (Error: Keyboard not attached. Press F1 to continue)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77
Stevens
Ginsberg and
Kennedy
will all be gone in the next year (by early 2007). The three are old, feeble and sick.
19 posted on 02/17/2006 7:49:27 PM PST by svcw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77

Well, I don't think he's right that we'd lose the Maine twins or Specter, assuming he picked someone that was as well qualified as Alito and Roberts. There were at least a half-dozen other names that were considered the last two times that would easily pass that test. Both Ediths, Garza, McConnell, possibly even Cornyn, etc. would lose no R votes with the exception of the true definition of a RINO Chafee.

Either way, it would be a huge coup for us electorally. It would depress D turnout if they didn't fillibuster, and increase R turnout, and hurt them with swing voters, if they did.

We can't lose on this one! Hope it happens!


20 posted on 02/17/2006 7:49:46 PM PST by zbigreddogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-106 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson