Posted on 02/12/2006 1:09:08 PM PST by wagglebee
DUmmie FUnnies 11-08-05 (Amazon.Com Customer Reviews of Mary Mapes Fiction Book)
DUmmie FUnnies 10-11-05 (Mary Mapes Fiction Book Returns To Amazon)
DUmmie FUnnies 10-04-05 (Mary Mapes Spins Fiction---Book Excerpt)
Talk about living in a world of denial.
Mapes, you couldn't find your fat a** in the dark with both hands and a flashlight if your life depended on it.
Posted on 11/09/2005 9:47:07 PM PST by doug from upland
<
She woke up one morning and her job was gone
Suits in the boardroom said go away
The docs were phony the FReepers showed
For her and Dan it's a bad hair day
(musical break)
She was sent reeling...she tried to hurt Dubya
Her dirty dealing...had been stopped, and she started to cry
But watch Mary Mapes...still telling lies
(musical break)
So many people she had deceived
Hatred of Bush made them blind with rage
She's claiming that she...did nothing wrong
And she is stuck on the same old page
On the same old page
(musical break)
She was sent reeling...she had tried to hurt Dubya
Her dirty dealing...had been stopped, and she started to cry
Mapes still has her true believers. I have spoken with a few of them. I have tried to explain the overwhelming evidence against the authenticity of memos, including the typographic evidence, but they continue to believe that "some typewriters had that sort of spacing back then, so the memos might be real."
Part of the difficulty in changing such peoples' minds comes from the difficulty of explaining the evidence against authenticity. Take the case of the animation showing two nearly identical versions of a TANG memo, the original and a version created in Microsoft Word. The Mapes believers say, "Sure the images look alike, so what? They both have the same words, so of course they look alike." It is hard to explain why they are wrong without being sidetracked explaining terms like microspacing, kerning, fonts, and typefaces.
Yet there is a good analogy available in something that everyone understands: keys. The precise shape of a string of printed characters is as unique as the shape of the teeth in a key.
Even a small change in a key's shape prevents it from fitting its lock, just as a small change in the shape of the printed characters would have produced document images that did not precisely match. Yet, after accounting for some apparently fax-induced artifacts, the document images do precisely match. There are many thousands of points of identity. Anyone with a copy of Word can easily produce his own "forgery" that is nearly identical to the CBS "original".
If two keys open the same high-quality deadbolt lock, the keys can be presumed to be copies. The same can be said for two matching document images.
One of the main problems with the memos in the superscripted "th".
All of the high dollar typewriters of that age simply raised the ball to superscript. Thus the top of the "th" would raise above the nubmer it notated. The word program reduces the size of the "th" as well as raising it.
Did her book not sell?
Perhaps she is saying that even though the form of the information appears fraudulent, that the content of the information has yet to be proven false.
Therefore, the story based on the information could be true (in Mapes' apparent view).
I believe this would dovetail with what Rather was claiming as he was "retiring."
I know. I'm not concerned with the issue of authenticity, that was settled long ago by Newcomer and others. I am concerned that Mapes revisionist version of her CBS debacle seems to have a fair number of believers. So, how to change their minds?
The typographic evidence is hard to explain to people who have no understanding of computer typography. Their attitude is exactly like that of Mapes: "...there were flaws in the typeface and all kinds of sort of dry and extremely dull details about proportional spacing and superscript and all that." These people simply will not be convinced by technical explanations.
That is why Charles's animated GIF from Little Green Footballs was so great -- even the most intellectually dishonest liberal had to choose between Mapes and his own eyes. Still, many liberals have never seen the animated GIF, and some, including Mapes, have tried to ignore its significance.
I tried to figure out how to convey the reason that the animated GIF is such compelling evidence, in non-technical language. It is not easy to do, but the "key" analogy helps.
Mapes never graduated past "Advocacy Journalism: Shaping Public Opinion 101".(For those of you in Rio Linda that means "Basic Brainwashing"...)
the infowarrior
Mapes couldn't find her own posterior given the use of both hands, a map, a compass, a seeing-eye-dog, *and* a Global Positioning System...
the infowarrior
The sour grapes of Mapes.
>>Which is why you and Danny Boy are history.<<
I'm going to miss Danny's wierd comparisons on election night though. They were good for a laugh when I start getting nervous!!
Exactly. That's what i wanted to say but couldn't put it
nearly as well as you did.
Dennis Wallis
Just come around to Free Republic. I'm from Texas, and I'll come up with all kinds of things like, "Well, Hillary's a nervous as a cat that sat in a tackle box.", or "Well, Mary Lou Retton couldn't be jumping any higher than the third district of Minnesota is tonight, this is tighter than a garter belt on Natalie Maines."
Thanks. I'd forgotten I'd even posted this. You must have been checking the ooooooold threads.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.