Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Soldiers Face Debilitating Diseases
NBC 30 ^ | 02/08/06 | NBC 30

Posted on 02/11/2006 4:02:49 PM PST by Dazedcat

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last
To: F16Fighter

Radiation poisoning OR exposure to nerve gas.

I know a 23 year old woman who served in Iraq (this war) who was discharged for medical reasons. Several military doctors have concluded that she was exposed to sarin. She has had a heart attack, pneumonia, rashes, and her lungs are losing their capacity to work properly. If there were no WMD as the know-it-alls have concluded why is this young woman's life almost over?


21 posted on 02/11/2006 5:11:08 PM PST by LoudRepublicangirl (loudrepublicangirl)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: joesnuffy
"Yep just like radiation experiments done on US soldiers and the real Agent Orange drenched troops...

The VAs policy of go away and die somewhere else I had hoped would change..."

A national disgrace.

Those who give all should GET all....

If only they were "Tsunami Victims."

22 posted on 02/11/2006 5:15:39 PM PST by F16Fighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Dazedcat

Unhealthy Hype
The Myth of Gulf War Syndrome Lives On

By Michael Fumento

National Review Online, December 22, 2004
Copyright 2004 National Review Online


For a decade now, countless studies in both the U.S. and U.K, along with myriad government-appointed panels that have reviewed them, have found that – in no meaningful sense – is there a "Gulf War Syndrome:" GWS is simply any illness any Gulf vet (or spouse or child of one) has or thinks he has. Since most studies are government-funded, veterans-advocacy groups and antiwar activists have insisted there's been a massive government cover-up. Ironically, now there is.

nro-gulf-war-syndrome.html

The panel's science director endorsed this book in 2003. So much for objectivity.

 
The latest Research Advisory Committee on Gulf War Illness, stacked with GWS activists by Department of Veterans Affairs Secretary Anthony Principi, said in so many words: "Damn the science and full speed ahead!" So doing, its September report – recently released – not only contradicted a previous advisory committee's findings but that of three different Institute of Medicine (IOM) panels; all appointed by the VA.

In doing so, it ignored that rates of both illness and death are lower among Gulf vets are no higher than those of comparable vets who didn't deploy; they're also far lower than those of comparable civilians. It also ignored the utter lack of commonality in symptoms, except that many studies have found GW vets have higher levels of stress-related illness.

Activists have attributed at least 123 symptoms to this "will-'o-the-wisp" syndrome, as former New England Journal of Medicine editor Marcia Angell described it to the New York Times." They include aching muscles, aching joints, abdominal pain, bruising, shaking, vomiting, fevers, irritability, fatigue, weight loss, weight gain, heartburn, bad breath, hair loss, graying hair, rashes, sore throat, itching, sore gums, constipation, sneezing, nasal congestion, leg cramps, hemorrhoids, hypertension, insomnia, and headaches.

Anybody who hasn't had most of the above symptoms is probably an android. But when a non-vet gets a cough, it's called "a cough." If a Gulf vet gets one, it's called GWS.

Among the causes that have been offered and rejected are: the insect repellant DEET that's been on the market since the 1950s and is used by about a third of all Americans, depleted uranium (DU) shells that are less radioactive than uranium rock, flies, oil-well fires, Aflatoxin mold, and even exposure to Scud-missile fuel. But as with a mirage, each has disappeared upon close examination.

As its bogeyman, the latest Advisory Committee claimed a "Growing body of evidence indicates an important component of [GWS] is neurological [and] supports a probable link with neurotoxic exposures during the war." It primarily focused on nerve gas exposure.

nro-gulf-war-syndrome.html

This is what real sarin gas exposure does. It doesn't wait 10 years and then make your joints ache.

 
In fact, there's no evidence that a single soldier suffered such exposure during the war. But shortly thereafter, engineers did blow up an Iraqi ammo dump containing some sarin nerve gas munitions. In a sop to activists, the Pentagon declared that 100,000 soldiers were "exposed" to nerve agent because at some point they were literally miles beneath an enormous plume of smoke and dust with a bit of sarin mixed in.

But the Defense Department also observed that exposure levels were too low for the sarin to have caused any illnesses. It noted that the amount required to incapacitate somebody was 2,700 times what the average soldier received. A lethal dose would be 7,700 times higher. So in no real sense were those soldiers exposed. Further, studies since then have found no increased illness among vets in this 100,000 group.

The Advisory Committee insists it can reject previous findings because of new evidence. Yet the IOM issued its own findings at almost the same time concluding "not enough evidence to draw conclusions as to whether long-term health effects are associated with low-dose exposures" of sarin – much less miniscule-dose exposure.

Dr. Harold C. Sox, editor of the prestigious Annals of Internal Medicine and the head of the first IOM committee to investigate GWS, told me the VA panel drew conclusions the IOM did not, "with largely the same evidence." Sox criticized the panel, saying that unlike the IOM it laid down no ground rules for how much evidence would be required to come to a conclusion. In other words, they could come to a conclusion with no evidence.

nro-gulf-war-syndrome.html

Anthony Principi: Like any good bureaucrat, he's trying to spend taxpayer dollars as quickly as possible. Legitimizing GWS will surely help.

 
He also questioned the make-up of the panel, as well he should. Principi chose the outcome when he chose the panel. Of the ten committee members, two work for activist groups and one was a Gulf vet who claims a mystery illness struck his unit during Desert Storm. Of the remaining seven, at least three had publicly expressed a pro-GWS bias before Principi chose them.

For example, Principi picked Lea Steele of Kansas State University's College of Human Ecology to be the panel's science director a year after she provided a back-cover endorsement for a book supporting the GWS thesis and the same month she expressed her prejudices in congressional testimony.

Another member, Dr. Robert Haley of the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, is the most prominent GWS activist physician in the country. He says the government's past denial of GWS has been a "10-year misadventure." Haley has been bankrolled since 1994 by GWS advocate H. Ross Perot. "At the least, this indicates the possibility of a conflict of interest," says Sox.

Further, Principi plans to keep on stacking the deck. He accepted the panel's advice to direct research funding only towards areas that might support its conclusion. "I've made it clear none of the $15 million [to be spent on GWS research next year] will be allocated for studies related to stress," he announced. We must not tolerate further medical journal articles with such titles as "Posttraumatic Stress Symptomology Is Associated with Unexplained Illness Attributed to Persian Gulf War Military Service."

What's truly sad about all this is that even as we give sick Gulf vets false hope that their particular illnesses can be cured in some way differently from the same illness in other people, we give healthy vets false fears that they'll carry throughout their lives. Don't our heroes deserve better?


Read Michael Fumento's additional writing on Gulf War Syndrome, on Agent Orange and on the military. Michael Fumento (U.S. Army Airborne, 1978-82) is the author of numerous books.


23 posted on 02/11/2006 5:20:07 PM PST by Straight Vermonter (John 6: 31-69)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LoudRepublicangirl
"I know a 23 year old woman who served in Iraq (this war) who was discharged for medical reasons. Several military doctors have concluded that she was exposed to sarin. She has had a heart attack, pneumonia, rashes, and her lungs are losing their capacity to work properly. If there were no WMD as the know-it-alls have concluded why is this young woman's life almost over?"

It's obvious the Iraqis had sarin booby-traps in waiting.

The U.S. government has obviously decided divulging THIS kind of WMD is counter-productive policy to recruiting fresh troops -- just as they'd decided during Iraqi War I.

God help our our patriots.

24 posted on 02/11/2006 5:21:10 PM PST by F16Fighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: ghostcat
This was your post:

I read the article and see nothing in it that would indicate a connection to depleted uranium

Which makes it obvious that you hadn't read the complete article - until of course, my last post.

25 posted on 02/11/2006 5:27:36 PM PST by bikepacker67 (Islam was born of Hagar the whore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: F16Fighter
It's obvious the Iraqis had sarin booby-traps in waiting.

She told me that she and others were ordered to explode the ordinances they found and she thinks that is how she was exposed. It angers me to think that we went to war with the reasoning that there were WMD. We have troops who are sick and dying because it really was there and now no one wants to admit that yes, we were really right, there are WMD. Why isn't the President talking about this? Surely he must be hearing reports of sick soldiers. I asked this young lady why she isn't talking about it publicly. She said she does not want the publicity that Jessica Lynch got from the press. She just wants to feel better. But even after all she has been through she states she wishes she could still be in the army and be with her fellow soldiers.
26 posted on 02/11/2006 5:38:20 PM PST by LoudRepublicangirl (loudrepublicangirl)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: bikepacker67
Sorry friend, I read it twice before your last post. What is obvious is that you didn't read past the first sentence in my original post or you didn't understand what I was saying. My post was making the point that the only connection was being made by people with an Axe to grind, people who offered no supporting evidence that there was in fact exposure to DU. The article says both of the affected service members were in rear areas. Areas where the likelihood of exposure to DU would be slight. "Sterry figures the initial symptoms began in Saudi Arabia in September of 1991""David Leighton, of Naugatuck, a Marine who served in Saudi Arabia in Desert Storm." If this article were being honest it would give examples of where these soldiers were exposed, not just make rather vague reference to Saudi Arabia. I personally believe that they were exposed to something, but I sure don't believe it likely that something was DU, at least without any evidence of exposure.
27 posted on 02/11/2006 6:01:27 PM PST by ghostcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: LoudRepublicangirl
"She told me that she and others were ordered to explode the ordinances they found and she thinks that is how she was exposed. It angers me to think that we went to war with the reasoning that there were WMD. We have troops who are sick and dying because it really was there and now no one wants to admit that yes, we were really right, there are WMD. Why isn't the President talking about this? Surely he must be hearing reports of sick soldiers."

Yeah, it is a shame...

Can you imagine a worse PR problem than this getting out?

28 posted on 02/11/2006 6:23:50 PM PST by F16Fighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Dazedcat

In every war in history, there was a certain percentage of soldiers who came home with debilitating "mystery" diseases.

Sad.


29 posted on 02/11/2006 6:38:56 PM PST by wouldntbprudent (If you can: Contribute more (babies) to the next generation of God-fearing American Patriots!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Straight Vermonter

Michael Fumento rocks. BTW, he just got fired from Scripps Howard. There is a concerted effort going on to eliminate conservative columnists from the print media (before Hillary's run?)


30 posted on 02/11/2006 8:50:54 PM PST by Jeff Chandler (Peace Begins in the Womb)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson