Posted on 02/11/2006 12:24:08 PM PST by Angus MacGregor
This guy's an ass.
True enough but still, thanks for posting this. One should know what the minor leaguers are doing. One day this 'journalist' might end up with a real post from which to issue really damaging delusions. Best to know ahead of time.
You left off the exit portal. Then your statement would have been complete.:-)
Gene Lyons is also a Coulter hater. Doubt if this turd has many nice days. Suffer some more Gene.
For future reference, you don't have to put INSANE LIBERAL ALERT in the thread title; just put Gene Lyons; the rest of us will know what's coming.
CLINTON BUTT KISSER.
For those of you who want to email this "author".
Try to name somebody Lyons doesn't hate other than Bill and Hillary Clinton.
ROTFLMAO!
Exactly.
Check the keywords... I added a couple just for you.
Message sent.
Lyons is possessed.
Message sent. :-)
Did so, thusly:
Dear Sir,
Your article is well-composed, which does indicate serious education on your part in grammar, vocabulary and composition. Still, I can also say that Peter Jackson has eminent qualifications to be a film-maker because his films are cogently plotted, reasonably characterized, well-photographed and brilliantly set and designed.
However, if Peter Jackson takes on a revisionist reading of the King Kong story, he's going to make an admirable muddle of it, losing the exquisite moral balance of the original, however well he manages to update the visuals that one now sees to be so primitive as first done. I must say that this also applies to your article. It is one thing to recognize that people whose entire existence is devoted to the purpose of simulating what they are told to enact as a simulacrum of reality are not quite with any real program and that their pronunciamenti are not to be trusted any more than any other civilian. It is quite another to project that delusional state on people who must, as a daily regimen, devote themselves to seeing facts and occasions exactly as they are and not as one might wish them to be. Your article projects Hollywood fantasy upon the real work of the Administration and tries to draw this out as an extended metaphor. That textual starting point being so utterly wrong, you cannot fail to produce a text that, while it is internally consistent, is utterly at odds with reality and draws precisely the worst possible conclusions from any confection of fact.
I suggest you go back and revisit your premises, this time making a real and honest point to utterly divest yourself of prejudicial hate of George Bush in particular and the governing efforts of this Administration in general. That would greatly improve your analysis. After all, I can read delusions in Dana Milbanks or Frank Rich. I don't need to refer to the Dunklin Democrat.
Or are you trying to impress the big leagues and get into the antique media show?
OH wow! GREAT! And elegent response! Well done Freeper!
Bravo!
Growing up in Midland Texas is not exactly "spending his whole life in cities."
And Rabid Moonbat.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.