Posted on 02/11/2006 6:30:21 AM PST by XR7
What an idiot. It wasn't President Bush that filibustered to make sure we did NOT get to develop our own oil sources in Alaska. The people who are preferring to "leave it to future generations" are losers like this author who rabidly oppose any short or intermediate solutions in their fantasy dream land notion that we can simply wish oil to go away NOW. Basic point about the Muzzies sane, rest of this article utter rabid stupidity.
It gets on my last nerve when these pundits fault President Bush for not doing something about oil dependence. Where is the support for drilling in places like Anwar? If we could find our own sources of oil it would break dependence.
"What an idiot. It wasn't President Bush that filibustered to make sure we did NOT get to develop our own oil sources in Alaska."
____________________________________
The author only spoke to the lack of oil conservation measures in this country....and she is right. She did not address oil exploration or oppose it or blame Bush for the lack of it....
I believe we need both...conservation and exploration....in order to get out from under Arab oil.
It's a start. Keep them out of our schools, Vegas, Disney, cruise ships. They want outhouse countries? Let them stay there...
You really believe she's an idiot?
Re-read the article.
Our leaders are the idiots for letting this violence continue, placating the despots of the "Muslim World" and referring to this death-cult as a "Religion of Peace."
This whole deal was enough for me. It's time to call for an end to this false religion. I think it needs to be eradicated in its entirety. Soon.
Some of these puppet masters are right here in the U.S.
I am sorry but "Conservation" is simply another name for Big Govt. Socialism. What people like this author mean is to impose economic sacrifices on the people through the exigency of the Govt just so their elitist egos can pat themselves on the back for being "Enviormentalists"
Read what she wrote. Her solution is to push for more of the Jimmy Carter era failed "Enrollment" policies. The solution, opposed religiously by people like this author, is getting the Govt OUT OF THE WAY. We have MORE then enough energy sources. The PROBLEM is the extremism eviromentalism have so priced everything out of the market with their socialist legal and regulatory roadblocks foreign oil is the cheapest bang for the buck.
Arab oil is the biggest energy bang for the least buck. The solution is NOT some fantasy "conservation" plan but getting the Govt OUT of the way. We have MORE then enough coal, nuclear and shale oil sources HERE. We are addicted to cheap foreign oil because the senile old 60s Eviros are stuck on the stupid notion that they can simply wish oil away. So we do NOTHING to develop our own short and interim energy sources because the wacko empty headed environs think they can simply wish us to leap 50 years into the future by wishing oil away.
We did not become an oil based economy over night, we will not cease to be an oil based economy over night. That fact does NOT change no matter how many deranged fantasies about "oil conservation" the Socialist Left dreams up
Which religion are you referring to? Islam or Socialism? Can you say "agitprop?"
Conservative really need to watch what they embrace. Just because you agree with her notions about the Muzzies DOES not make her on the same side as you for everything else. YOU better go re-read what she is selling her. This is just another establishment Enviro pushing for more of the failed Jimmy Carter era "conservation" nonsense. What they mean by "Conservation" is a massive expansion of the Govt to micromanage every aspect of YOUR life so THEY can feel good about THEIR Environmental purity. NO THANK YOU.
One of the Arab countries, probably Iran, is demanding the protestors switch their hatred and condemnation from Denmark to the US, so it looks as if caving to Islamofascism won't work for Uncle Sam. We're doomed.
The concept of socialism will always be around because it works so well in theory to young people. Only the benefit of life experience cleanses it from them. In most cases, anyway.
I guess, to you, all those conservation measures...rationing etc..that were done during WW2 to facilitate the war effort were a bunch of nonsense too.
If our troops can sacrifice their lives for us...we can certainly sacrifice a bit over here to help the WOT. And getting out from under Arab oil is of prime importance in that effort.
Until we find that endless oil reserve you refer too...and I am definitely in favor of exploration...conservation is a good tool to meeting our goal.
"The American media's generally spineless response has been likewise embarrassing."
Is the American media really spineless? Oh, my. I'm shocked! There's goes my world view...
Although I agree with part of your premise, I think you need to get out more. Global socialism is on the rise.
Ethanol plants are multiplying and stations will quadruple this year. Ford is notifying customers that thy are driving one of a million flex fuel cars already on the road. They are making fuel oil out of turkey plant refuse in MO and out of trash in Philadelphia. Cowshit is fueling ethanol plants in Texas and pigshit is used in Indiana. Both Governor Patwaki in NY and Bush in Fl have had business summits to promote ethanol. In FL a scientist developed an ecoli bacterium to digest citrus peel waste to make the stuff.
Obviously, GM and Ford have to retool to bring these vehicles to market, but necessary changes are relayed to us as bankrupcy, plant closing, and layoffs. Why is this whole thing being so badly ignored and miscovered? Certainly, it is the result of many years of public policy and private enterprise. Are liberals unhappy that this would come to pass on Bush's watch? They like to paint him as antienviornmentalist, though he is anything but. He led Texas power deregulation with targets for alternate sources that produced surpluses that compensated for failed CA policies. His own home is state of the art energy efficient.
Or, are they so tapped into government command economics that they cannot see free enterprise responses when they are springing up everywhere?
Obviously, GM and Ford have to retool to bring these vehicles to market, but necessary changes are relayed to us as bankrupcy, plant closing, and layoffs. Why is this whole thing being so badly ignored and miscovered? Certainly, it is the result of many years of public policy and private enterprise. Are liberals unhappy that this would come to pass on Bush's watch? They like to paint him as antienviornmentalist, though he is anything but. He led Texas power deregulation with targets for alternate sources that produced surpluses that compensated for failed CA policies. His own home is state of the art energy efficient. Four or five corps have pooled investment to build a clean coal plant that sequesters CO2 in the ground. Although everyone rags him about a Kyoto treaty the senate refused to ratify, he has negoiated a Pacific initiative to sell clean power technology to China and India that will be lucrative.
Or, are they so tapped into government command economics that they cannot see free enterprise responses when they are springing up everywhere?
"I am sorry but "Conservation" is simply another name for Big Govt. Socialism. "
Huh? Conservation was born from conservatism. Don't equate conservation with ecoterrorism and socialism.
"This whole deal was enough for me. It's time to call for an end to this false religion. I think it needs to be eradicated in its entirety. Soon."
I recall the uproar a couple of years ago when Pat Robertson called Muslim a violent religion. I, too, thought he was totally out of line at the time. But now, two years hence,I don't think so.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.