Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CA: Prosecutors say jurors' declarations are false (Kenneth Starr death penalty appeal hanky panky?)
ap on Bakersfield Californian ^ | 2/10/06 | David Kravets and Lisa Leff - ap

Posted on 02/10/2006 7:24:22 PM PST by NormsRevenge

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

1 posted on 02/10/2006 7:24:25 PM PST by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
This is going to make liberal heads explode!

They got Ken Starr, who they hate more than a heterosexual carnivorous SUV, committing shenanigans in court - BUT! - he was trying to save a noble minority murderer from Amerikkkka's racist death penalty!

Kabooom go their brains! Look John Kerry's already popped:


2 posted on 02/10/2006 7:28:42 PM PST by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dead
Thanks for the laugh there dead. That's a really funny pic.

L

3 posted on 02/10/2006 7:30:13 PM PST by Lurker (In God I trust. Everybody else shows me their hands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dead

Kerry was at the Olympics? He sure gets around. ;-)


4 posted on 02/10/2006 7:33:23 PM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Monthly Donor spoken Here. Go to ... https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
"Aside from the fact that the declaration is a complete fabrication, I never would have signed a declaration under penalty of perjury that included a misspelling of my name without at least correcting the misspelling," one juror said, according to the declaration authorities gave to Schwarzenegger.

It sure doesn't sound to me as if this guy was intimidated by the prosecutor.

I was never a great fan of Starr's. He pulled his punches in the clinton investigation, and he delayed far too long, giving clinton time to spin himself out of trouble.

5 posted on 02/10/2006 7:37:45 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Can`t believe Starr would knowingly submit forged docs to the Gov. Tis more to the story, sports fans
6 posted on 02/10/2006 7:37:48 PM PST by bybybill (If the Rats win, we are doomed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

If the papers are fake, they'll be a wake.


7 posted on 02/10/2006 7:38:40 PM PST by jazusamo (A Progressive is only a Socialist in a transparent disguise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bybybill

Starr and Senior could have been duped.Maybe the investigator forged the documents?


8 posted on 02/10/2006 7:55:20 PM PST by Thombo2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

If they ARE fake, I suspect the investigator who collected them forged them without defense counsel's knowledge. Starr certainly would never be involved in something like this.


9 posted on 02/10/2006 7:57:00 PM PST by the Real fifi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thombo2

"Starr and Senior could have been duped.Maybe the investigator forged the documents?"

There is another possibility. The defense bar works very hard to disqualify all reasonable people from juries. Maybe they were so successful in this case that they secured a jury with a number of idiot who will agree with whomever spoke to them most recently and will sign statements on both sides of an issue.

That would explain this group of 5 or 6:

1. Voting for death when influenced by others on the jury.

2. Saying they wished the guy they voted to execute could be spared.

3. Saying they did not say they wished the guy they voted to execute could be spared.

We often seek lowest common denominator juries and not surprisingly get them.


10 posted on 02/10/2006 8:01:09 PM PST by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Ken Starr screws up again? This is news?

Ken Starr gets $168 million in the Clinton case--all from taxpayers--achieves nothing. Ken Starr goes off to a happy sunset with his staff, very rich.

Starr is an embarrassment, except to RINOs, merely pigging at the public trough. He prolonged a process to increase his revenues, and accomplished nothing.

His poor performance and self-aggrandizement, assured that he would never be put forth for a Federal Court appointment. GWBush never put him on a short list. A complete jerk. Let him rest in obscurity.



11 posted on 02/10/2006 8:42:40 PM PST by thomaswest (Labeling: My religion is the one true faith; yours is a cult.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thombo2
Starr and Senior could have been duped.

Well, D'uh! Why do you think Hitlery got away with the Foster murder, and Toon got away with... (to much to list)?

12 posted on 02/10/2006 8:45:28 PM PST by Revolting cat! ("In the end, nothing explains anything.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: dead

I saw that picture from the Olympics earlier and thought the very same thing. Bravo!


13 posted on 02/10/2006 8:47:43 PM PST by granite ("I don't know anyone here that's been killed with a handgun.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Why is the defence or prosecution allowed to communicate with jurors in a death penalty case?

This is jury tampering pure and simple.


14 posted on 02/10/2006 9:46:16 PM PST by beaver fever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
He wasn't planning on it - but then he and Tereza realized they needed to put some more hours on the G5.
15 posted on 02/10/2006 10:10:28 PM PST by Wally_Kalbacken
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: beaver fever

No. It is okay to contact the jurors after they've rendered their decision .


16 posted on 02/10/2006 10:45:37 PM PST by the Real fifi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: the Real fifi

So these forged letters were submitted after the jury rendered its decision. But why is this not subornation in the penalty phase?


17 posted on 02/10/2006 10:49:01 PM PST by beaver fever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: beaver fever

This jury had finished its work. It had been released. There was no more work for it to do.


18 posted on 02/10/2006 10:53:29 PM PST by the Real fifi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Revolting cat!
Well, D'uh! Why do you think Hitlery got away with the Foster murder ...

Did you know that Kavanaugh had a hand in limiting the Foster material that appeared in the Independent Counsel's record?

The Kavanaugh that GWB has nominated to a seat on the DC Circuit Court of Appeals.

19 posted on 02/10/2006 10:57:29 PM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

Then why is Hillary blocking consideration of his nomination?


20 posted on 02/10/2006 10:59:16 PM PST by the Real fifi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson