Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BP to build clean-burning power plant
Anchorage Daily News ^ | February 10, 2006 | PAULA DOBBYN

Posted on 02/10/2006 12:51:58 PM PST by thackney

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last
Another project by those "evil" oil companies < /sarcasm>
1 posted on 02/10/2006 12:52:00 PM PST by thackney
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Comment #2 Removed by Moderator

To: thackney
carbon dioxide emissions, which cause global warming

< groan>

3 posted on 02/10/2006 12:56:37 PM PST by SIDENET ("IT'S A COOKBOOK!!!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Individual Rights in NJ

Honestly, nuclear power plants are very difficult to destroy through a terror attack as is. The best chance is to drive a large airplane into the building. That's been done already, and isn't happening again.

I'm not very worried about a nuclear power plant accident at all. The new ones, especially the new "pebble bed" reactors are designed to be impossible to melt down. As far as I'm concerned, we could replace all of our electricity generation with those within few years. And, you really wouldn't need to really "fortify" them. The security they already have should be more than enough.


4 posted on 02/10/2006 1:00:59 PM PST by farlander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: thackney
Enviromenalist Wacko response: It is to little to late. It does nothing to help with the dependency of fossil fuel. If they're making money off this plant, it just means they have found another way to exploit the masses.
5 posted on 02/10/2006 1:02:48 PM PST by oyez (Appeasement is insanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #6 Removed by Moderator

Comment #7 Removed by Moderator

To: oyez
It does nothing to help with the dependency of fossil fuel. If they're making money off this plant, it just means they have found another way to exploit the masses.

Well, it seems like the input fuel is a waste product from refining so there's a strong economic basis. Nothing to be upset about here as far as I can tell.

8 posted on 02/10/2006 1:05:42 PM PST by Uncledave (It takes some pretty serious yodeling to call for a filibuster from a five-star ski resort)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Individual Rights in NJ
I don't get this. If there is clean fossil fuel power and such, why is it new now?

From BP Announcement:

The proposed Carson project would combine a number of existing industrial processes to provide a new option for generating electricity without significant CO2 emissions. Petroleum coke produced at California refineries would first be converted to hydrogen and CO2 gases and around 90 percent of the CO2 captured and separated.

The hydrogen gas stream would be used to fuel a gas turbine to generate electricity. The captured CO2 would be transported by pipeline to an oilfield and injected into reservoir rock formations thousands of feet underground, both stimulating additional oil production and permanently trapping the CO2.

But the detail is probably found later in the article:

The costs of hydrogen power are higher than those of traditional power plant fuels. As a result, the project will depend, in part, on incentives provided in the Federal Energy Policy Act of 2005 for advanced gasification technologies. In addition, continued progress on the California Public Utilities Commission's electricity "resource adequacy" procurement policies will encourage this first-of-its-kind facility.

9 posted on 02/10/2006 1:06:34 PM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: thackney
BP to build clean-burning power plant

Nuclear?

10 posted on 02/10/2006 1:06:46 PM PST by Toby06 (Hindsight alone is not wisdom, and second-guessing is not a strategy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Individual Rights in NJ
I'd like to see them build thousands of these. They're small, easily secured, intrinsically safe, and a distributed source. Bulletproof solution and very difficult to interrupt.
11 posted on 02/10/2006 1:08:33 PM PST by Carry_Okie (There are people in power who are truly evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Individual Rights in NJ
Then just go about taking down every single oil

Very little crude oil is used in making electrical power.

Most oil goes to transportation and industrial use.


12 posted on 02/10/2006 1:10:29 PM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: thackney

I seem to recall that the "Garbage into Oil" plant is able to convert this oil coke into a form of normal oil that can be refined into heating fuel.

If that is correct, along with this use, "Oil Coke" is not so much without value as it is under utilized.

Turning waste products into energy, this is the sort of intelligent use of existing resources that needs to expand.


13 posted on 02/10/2006 1:16:37 PM PST by Richard-SIA ("The natural progress of things is for government to gain ground and for liberty to yield" JEFFERSON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Individual Rights in NJ

By starting with methane CH4, and then stripping the C to combine it with O2, freeing the H4 for combustion, the process gives up over 50% of the mole energy; this means a lot of wasted energy by anyone's standards.

The manufactured CO2 will be pumped underground to "sink" it; out of sight, out of mind.


14 posted on 02/10/2006 1:19:15 PM PST by Old Professer (Fix the problem, not the blame!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: thackney
I think Nuke is the way to go for base load power plants, in New England. Pipe line restrictions and the better use of Natural Gas as a chemical feed stock should restrict it to peaking.

ISO NE is concerned about the lack of oil fired generation, with a good turn down in this area, but with the commie Governments in this region I am not going to hold my breath.

15 posted on 02/10/2006 1:19:51 PM PST by Little Bill (A 37%'r, a Red Spot on a Blue State, rats are evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Uncledave
You know how it is, the enviro's are never happy.
16 posted on 02/10/2006 1:20:45 PM PST by oyez (Appeasement is insanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: thackney

PAULA DOBBYN you should cease your carbon dioxide emissions, which cause global warming.


17 posted on 02/10/2006 1:24:45 PM PST by sausageseller (Look out for the jackbooted spelling police. There! Everywhere!(revised cause the "man" accosted me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Why are they building anything here ???? What we are some third world country now ?

They need to leave quickly as possible.


18 posted on 02/10/2006 1:39:05 PM PST by Steveone (Liberalism is a brain tumor!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steveone

What are you talking about?


19 posted on 02/10/2006 1:41:12 PM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Steveone
In 2005, BP invested more than $6 billion in capital expenditures and employed about 37,000 people in the United States.
20 posted on 02/10/2006 1:49:28 PM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson