Skip to comments.
Hollywood takes liberties with true stories but 'Glory Road' is a flagrant foul (Blatant hypocrisy)
Seattle Post Ingelligencer ^
| February 10, 2006
| WILLIAM ARNOLD
Posted on 02/10/2006 9:26:13 AM PST by DukeBillie
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
What hypocrites! It is OK to play with the truth when you agree with the point being made but not if it makes you look bad. I live in Seattle and see this type of logic all the time. I just love the last line "I suppose it just depends on your point of view. When the movie untruth slaps you in the face, it's not artistic license: It's a lie."
To: DukeBillie
I thought Glory Road was the name of a pretty good novel by Robert Heinlein.
To: DukeBillie
...makes you wonder if Bruckheimer is following that media "responsibility" they keep talking about in regards to the Mohammed cartoons...
3
posted on
02/10/2006 9:32:50 AM PST
by
Tzimisce
(How Would Mohammed Vote? Hillary for President!)
To: DukeBillie
I have to agree with respect to the hypocrisy here - shall we cite the people trashed in, say, any Oliver Stone movie? Michael Moore? When this sort of thing happens to knuckle-dragging rednecks it's all good fun, when it happens to Seattle liberals it's some sort of crime.
It's a movie. It's fantasy. The author might just as well suck it up, because Hollywood doesn't care.
To: DukeBillie
They stink at acting and directing too.
5
posted on
02/10/2006 9:37:54 AM PST
by
freekitty
To: DukeBillie
6
posted on
02/10/2006 9:39:57 AM PST
by
VOA
To: Steely Tom
Would have made a pretty good movie, too. Sex, nudity, violence AND a neat SF/Fantasy plot. Have to be at least an "R" rating.
And I bet it would go over great!
7
posted on
02/10/2006 9:44:37 AM PST
by
Little Ray
(I'm a reactionary, hirsute, gun-owning, knuckle dragging, Christian Neanderthal and proud of it!)
To: Little Ray
The whole purpose of Hollywood is to make money...and if they obscure the truth, the audience isn't going to see it. Though I must admit that it is really scary to believe that people get their "truth" from Hollywood.
8
posted on
02/10/2006 9:46:19 AM PST
by
gman992
To: Steely Tom
I read it recently and it doesn't hold up well. The last quarter or so is a huge letdown.
To: gman992
If the whole point of Hollyweird was to make money, they would make more movies like The Chronicles of Narnia and fewer like Brokeback Mountain.
But they don't do they?
Hollyweird ain't about money.
10
posted on
02/10/2006 9:52:02 AM PST
by
Little Ray
(I'm a reactionary, hirsute, gun-owning, knuckle dragging, Christian Neanderthal and proud of it!)
To: Darkwolf377
I read it recently and it doesn't hold up well. The last quarter or so is a huge letdown. Could be. It was the last Heinlein I ever bought. I don't think I finished it. Oh, wait a minute. The last Heinlen I ever bought was Friday. I only made it through about the first six pages of that one.
(steely)
To: DukeBillie
When the movie untruth slaps you in the face, it's not artistic license: It's a lie. It all depends on how distorting facts makes you feel. If it makes you feel good, the end justifies the means. If it makes you feel bad, it's a lie.
This, from an apparently literate and educated person.
12
posted on
02/10/2006 10:02:59 AM PST
by
Taliesan
(The power of the State to do good is the power of the State to do evil.)
To: DukeBillie
Absolutely. Imagine doing a movie of the ACLU and accusing them of conspiring with nefarious elements to undermine the US and ...oh well if one can only dream!!!
13
posted on
02/10/2006 10:04:55 AM PST
by
bubman
To: DukeBillie
Did the hire James Frey as a screen writer?
14
posted on
02/10/2006 10:08:51 AM PST
by
stylin19a
(God does not apply to your alloted time, the hours spent playing golf.)
To: DukeBillie
Not mentioned in the article is the fact that Haskins had been coach at Texas Western for 5 years, I think; he was not in his first year as portrayed in the movie.
To: Steely Tom
I always thought "The Moon is a Harsh Mistress" would make a great movie. (my favorite Heinlein book,which is obvious from my screen name) but, I have, as yet, not seen a good adaptation of one of his books on film.
16
posted on
02/10/2006 10:24:48 AM PST
by
FreeLuna
To: Billthedrill
It's a movie. It's fantasy. But the problem is that people unaware of the facts see it, buy it as truth, make plans and choices based on the perceptions it communicates, and frequently take action with or against others based on those perceptions.
17
posted on
02/10/2006 10:25:54 AM PST
by
William Terrell
(Individuals can exist without government but government can't exist without individuals.)
To: Taliesan
I couldn't tell if the author of this piece realized just how flawed his logic was. I keep thinking liberals can't be that stupid but they keep proving to me that they really are! Just proves being educated isn't the same thing as being smart.
18
posted on
02/10/2006 10:27:36 AM PST
by
DukeBillie
("The two most common elements in the universe are Hydrogen and stupidity" Harlan Ellison)
To: Steely Tom
you and me both. Heinlein went down hill big time in his old age.
19
posted on
02/10/2006 10:35:43 AM PST
by
ghostcat
To: William Terrell
But the problem is that people unaware of the facts see it, buy it as truth
as planned.
20
posted on
02/10/2006 10:37:30 AM PST
by
auboy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson