Skip to comments.
Scott Ritter: Iran Only Wants Peaceful Nuclear Power
Threatswatch ^
| 2/07/06
| Threatswatch
Posted on 02/07/2006 7:12:56 PM PST by freedom44
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 121-132 next last
To: freedom44
Maybe he's getting money from Iran. Allegedly he did from Iraq, when he did his one-eighty on Iraqi WMDs.
61
posted on
02/07/2006 7:41:24 PM PST
by
Shermy
To: freedom44
Anyone else curious why lefties who won't let us build a nuclear plant here in the United States are so excited about Iran building one?
62
posted on
02/07/2006 7:41:55 PM PST
by
Tzimisce
(How Would Mohammed Vote? Hillary for President!)
To: freedom44
Nothing's more peaceful than a pile of rubble.
63
posted on
02/07/2006 7:44:40 PM PST
by
blau993
(Labs for love; .357 for Security.)
To: Keith in Iowa
Not fair to Juan and give Ritter way too much credit
I think maybe Ritter is to weapons analysis what, say, Mary Mapes, or Peter Arnett is to Journalism.
To: freedom44
Is this scrappleface??? Should be.
65
posted on
02/07/2006 7:44:51 PM PST
by
Steveone
(Liberalism is a brain tumor!)
To: freedom44
Ahhh, so the most infamous Burger King customer of all time proclaims that Iran only wants "peaceful" nuclear energy eh?
Ohhhhhkay Scotty-boy, perhaps you can explain the statements of Iran's nutball leader who has stated that Israel should be "wiped off the map", and is adamant about Iran's "right" to do whatever they want when it comes to nukes.
Who bankrolls this creep anyway?
66
posted on
02/07/2006 7:45:30 PM PST
by
mkjessup
(The Shah doesn't look so bad now, eh? But nooo, Jimmah said the Ayatollah was a 'godly' man.)
To: freedom44
Scott Ritter doesn't think with his head.
To: freedom44
This article convinces me that my theory on Ritter helping Sadam hide or get rid of the WMD's may be correct; the man is 100% corrupt (IMHO).
To: Keith in Iowa
Ritter is to weapons analysis what Juan Williams is to journalism.
-
Hey come on. Ritter is like "Baghdad Bob", without the delivery.
Juan Williams is actually pretty cool. He's got spunk. :)
Ritter's a punk.
To: freedom44; Stellar Dendrite; flashbunny
Former UN Weapons Inspector Scott Ritter, promoting his book in New Mexico, said that Iran simply wants peaceful nuclear power, not nuclear weapons, and that US Ambassador to the UN, John Bolton, already has a speech written for the coming US nuclear bombing of Iran Yeah...um, Scotty...why does Iran NEED enriched Uranium? Is enriched Uranium used in "peaceful nuclear power"? What arte the odds on that Scotty?
Yeah, you know it...so...when you were arrested, what were you doing to that little girl you picked up in the chat room?
Did you at least offer her some primo weed?
So I guess the signs are still valid...
70
posted on
02/07/2006 7:50:33 PM PST
by
Itzlzha
("The avalanche has already started...it is too late for the pebbles to vote")
To: blau993
"Nothing's more peaceful than a pile of rubble."
I dunno, I've always preferred the smooth look of glass...
71
posted on
02/07/2006 7:52:16 PM PST
by
Frank_Discussion
(May the wings of Liberty never lose a feather!)
To: freedom44
And Scott only wants to date adult women who just happen to look pre-pubescent.
72
posted on
02/07/2006 7:52:23 PM PST
by
PzLdr
("The Emperor is not as forgiving as I am" - Darth Vader)
To: freedom44
Iran, a major oil-producing country, doesn't need nuclear power. But some people want us to ignore this fact.
From 1933-1939, Hitler didn't need to build a modern army to keep France or Poland from invading Germany. But some political simpletons, like Neville Chamberlain, believed that Hitler wanted peace...
73
posted on
02/07/2006 7:56:06 PM PST
by
04-Bravo
To: freedom44
Iran, a major oil-producing country, doesn't need nuclear power. But some people want us to ignore this fact.
From 1933-1939, Hitler didn't need to build a modern army to keep France or Poland from invading Germany. But some political simpletons, like Neville Chamberlain, believed that Hitler wanted peace...
74
posted on
02/07/2006 7:56:37 PM PST
by
04-Bravo
To: Muleteam1
Anyone know where the James A. Little Theater is located?Umm, someplace near a playground or middle school?
To: freedom44
Scott Ritter's utterings could not be taken any more seriously than Ramsey Lewis The old fart that used to work for LBJ as his attorney general and the equally nausating Cindy Sheenan appearing at a leftist love fest in washington dc and broadcasted on c - span.
I saw this nausating display of leftist rantings on cable tv last weekend.
Just take it for a grain of salt if Cindy Sheenan lived in nazi germany and she ranted about Adolf Hitler the way she bashes George Bush The gestapo would have taken great pleasure breaking both of her legs so she can hobble up a scaffold and be hung by the neck until she was dead.
As for ramsey clark he would have been labeled as a traitor and hung off a meathook like a side of beef.
It really fathoms me how Ramsey Lewis and Scott Ritter are former marines but again so was lee harvey oswald
ISN'T FREE SPEECH GRAND?
IF IT WAS NOT FOR THE US MILITARY PEOPLE IN THE UNITED STATES WOULD NOT HAVE THAT PRIVILEDGE.
76
posted on
02/07/2006 8:02:09 PM PST
by
mannie
To: freedom44
"..Former UN Weapons Inspector Scott Ritter, promoting his book in New Mexico, said that Iran simply wants peaceful nuclear power, not nuclear weapons.."
Ritter has to be on some Islamic payroll or being Blackmailed (possibly over his taste for under aged girls). Even outright insanity would not explain some of the crap he puts out. He flipped from being a zealous arms inspector to being an apologist for Saddaam and now this. Somebody over there owns him and is running him.
To: freedom44
Whose payroll is he on this time?
78
posted on
02/07/2006 8:05:53 PM PST
by
Inkie
(Attn Dems: Loose Lips Sink Ships -- but hey, I guess that's your goal))
To: Keith in Iowa
Juan is just wrong, but he's a good American. Ritter is a freaking traitor.
79
posted on
02/07/2006 8:07:03 PM PST
by
Inkie
(Attn Dems: Loose Lips Sink Ships -- but hey, I guess that's your goal))
To: freedom44
80
posted on
02/07/2006 8:10:50 PM PST
by
teletech
(Friends don't let friends vote DemocRAT)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 121-132 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson