Skip to comments.
Dark matter warms up: Unseen mass more 'tepid' than thought.
Nature Magazine ^
| 06 February 2006
| Mark Peplow
Posted on 02/07/2006 3:56:57 AM PST by PatrickHenry
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60 next last
Most illuminating.
To: VadeRetro; Junior; longshadow; RadioAstronomer; Doctor Stochastic; js1138; Shryke; RightWhale; ...
SciencePing |
An elite subset of the Evolution list. See the list's explanation at my freeper homepage. Then FReepmail to be added or dropped. |
|
|
|
2
posted on
02/07/2006 3:58:13 AM PST
by
PatrickHenry
(Virtual Ignore for trolls, lunatics, dotards, scolds, & incurable ignoramuses.)
To: PatrickHenry
3
posted on
02/07/2006 4:06:14 AM PST
by
Thebaddog
(Dog can like cats who are cool)
To: PatrickHenry
Since they cannot see dark matter and do not know where it is, or how much there is, how can they measure the temperature. Must be because of global warming.
4
posted on
02/07/2006 4:14:59 AM PST
by
YOUGOTIT
To: Thebaddog
Galactic warming???
...Bush, Cheney, Rove, Haliburton at fault.
5
posted on
02/07/2006 4:15:30 AM PST
by
Vaquero
(time again for the Crusades.)
To: PatrickHenry
Isn't God awesome! He put something out there that we cannot see, but we can infer its presence by the effects it has; how apropos!
6
posted on
02/07/2006 4:16:11 AM PST
by
trebb
("I am the way... no one comes to the Father, but by me..." - Jesus in John 14:6 (RSV))
To: Thebaddog
Global warming? Luminiferous aether.
To: PatrickHenry
Could it be second-hand smoke from the democracks? (Only kidding)
8
posted on
02/07/2006 4:18:22 AM PST
by
Rapscallion
(Democrats: Once a party; now a hate group.)
To: trebb
Although dark matter cannot be seen, its existence can be inferred ... If this same phrase was applied to Intelligent Design imagine how livid scientists would be that inference was applied to existence.
9
posted on
02/07/2006 4:35:31 AM PST
by
Noachian
(To control the courts the people must first control their Congress.)
To: Noachian
The difference is that there is empirical evidence by which to infer the existence of dark matter, whereas not only is there no empirical evidence by which to infer the existence of intelligence design, but rather all the empirical evidence suggests its nonexistence.
10
posted on
02/07/2006 4:54:32 AM PST
by
AntiGuv
To: PatrickHenry
Nice article. Tks for posting.
I take issue with the "there must be about 6 times as much dark matter as ordinary matter" hypothesis.
Why 'must' it be so? Turns out that only under the above hypothesis can Scientists show that the expanding universe will at some point eventually stop and recontract. Turns out that a universe that suddenly popped into existence (at God's command?) is indigestible to our scientific brethren.
As for ID, it can neither be proved nor disproved at this point. To (dis)prove it, evidence from 'outside' the universe will be needed, which by construction, is impossible to have.
11
posted on
02/07/2006 4:56:38 AM PST
by
voletti
(Awareness and Equanimity.)
To: Rapscallion
...dark matter being made of some kind of weakly interacting, massive particles (WIMPS).
Schwarznegger: GURLY matter.
12
posted on
02/07/2006 4:57:30 AM PST
by
carumba
(The secret of life is honesty and fair dealing. If you can fake that, you've got it made. Groucho)
To: voletti
Turns out that a universe that suddenly popped into existence (at God's command?) is indigestible to our scientific brethren.Ever heard of the Big Bang?
13
posted on
02/07/2006 5:00:38 AM PST
by
AntiGuv
To: Thebaddog
Hot milk glow-bull warning for the gullah bull
14
posted on
02/07/2006 5:00:42 AM PST
by
dhuffman@awod.com
(The conspiracy of ignorance masquerades as common sense.)
To: AntiGuv
Precisely what I'm talking about.
The Big bang is nothing but the universe popping into existence.
What existed before the big bang? The dark matter hypothesis is nothng but an attempt to potray the expansion and contraction of the universe as some kinda endless birth and death cycle at a cosmic scale so that the idea of a creator intervening can be put aside.
Have a nice day.
15
posted on
02/07/2006 5:05:16 AM PST
by
voletti
(Awareness and Equanimity.)
To: AntiGuv
The difference is that there is empirical evidence by which to infer the existence of dark matter, whereas not only is there no empirical evidence by which to infer the existence of intelligence design, but rather all the empirical evidence suggests its nonexistence.I don't know - the fact that we can observe a pretty universal belief in God seems to be empirical to me.
16
posted on
02/07/2006 5:14:41 AM PST
by
trebb
("I am the way... no one comes to the Father, but by me..." - Jesus in John 14:6 (RSV))
To: PatrickHenry
Anyone who thinks that dark matter cannot be seen has never been to a dairy farm.
To: PatrickHenry
Dark matter heating up - Bush's faulkt for not signing Kyoto!
18
posted on
02/07/2006 5:22:47 AM PST
by
doc30
(Democrats are to morals what and Etch-A-Sketch is to Art.)
To: PatrickHenry
And the end result is startling: it seems that dark matter is whizzing about at some 10,000 °C . Isn't 10,000 °C kind of hot to use the term "tepid" in the headline? Matter at that temperature should be emitting light at about the color of our sun.
19
posted on
02/07/2006 5:56:15 AM PST
by
CPOSharky
(Insanity: Doing the same thing over and over expecting different results. Like demoncrats.)
To: PatrickHenry
WIMPs rule! Who knew?
20
posted on
02/07/2006 6:04:12 AM PST
by
VadeRetro
(Liberalism is a cancer on society. Creationism is a cancer on conservatism.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson