'HIATUS' FOR HILLARY?

ABC | 02.03.06 | Mia T

[malia]

I don't view this as a 'hate clinton' site. For me, this is an informational site, a site that says what the media will not say, will not tell us. This site exposes the true hillary clinton, bill clinton, clintons as a family, and the Democrats as a whole. As an example - have much did you hear about ...---... Sandy Berger, Nat'l Security Advisor under clinton, walking into the archives and stuffing his pants with National Security Papers and walking out. When questioned he said it was an accident - he did not mean to do so, he didn't know they were there - Berger had papers in his socks for pity sakes. Berger was stealing papers to cya! And he got his hands slapped!!!!!!

Sonny -- I don't think hillary 'put together' the tv show! But yes, I believe it was aimed at 'a woman in the White House' idea. The Democrats and the media do have the mindset of -- if you hear it often enough it is the truth, ---- so if we see a woman President (on tv) often enough hollywood thinks we will accept 'hillary as president' because we see it every week. No big deal!!!!!

MiaT -- job well done and new faces join you every week - keep spreading the truth!!!

[Faith]

Great work once again, Mia T. It appears that Hillary's star is fading. She would be a disastrous first female president and would likely set back the entire gender for many a year.

[beyond the sea]

Look like Emma Thompson after being stung on the nose by a couple of bees.

[Sonny M]

To be honest, I think Hillary and everything about her is over rated, she isn't even a medicore politician.

I just hate the fact that people act like she has some kind of ability.

Hollywood likes her, Hollywood also likes Michael Moore, and he isn't going to ever win office.

Commander in chief was lame, yea it was liberal, but so was west wing, and that show was still better.

I really wish people would take a chill pill and accept that a Clinton will never ever sit in the oval office ever again, under any circumstances.

[Mia T]

I agree. Missus clinton is, at best, mediocre. (And her husband is no better.) (See below.)
But ruthlessness often trumps mediocrity.
And besides, mediocrity isn't a disqualifier in any case. Just look around DC.

I wake up every morning at nine and grab for the morning paper. Then I look at the obituary page. If my name is not on it, I get up.

Benjamin Franklin

Would that the clintons were similarly inclined....
[M]issus clinton as a viable national candidate was always a mirage.¹⁹ Her presence on the national stage is maintained daily by all manner of device. Her favorites: the zipper-hoist, the throne, the complex question, the non-question and other sleights of hand, and, of course, the jackboot.

IMPERIOUS HILLARY
(THE REPORTS OF HER DEATH ARE GREATLY UNDERSTATED)
by Mia T, 12.05.05

Clinton Administration Veteran:
"Hillary Rodham Clinton needs to be kept very far away from the White House for the rest of her life."

My two cents' worth--and I think it is the two cents' worth of everybody who worked for the Clinton Administration health care reform effort of 1993-1994--is that Hillary Rodham Clinton needs to be kept very far away from the White House for the rest of her life. Heading up health-care reform was the only major administrative job she has ever tried to do. And she was a complete flop at it. She had neither the grasp of policy substance, the managerial skills, nor the political smarts to do the job she was then given. And she wasn't smart enough to realize that she was in over her head and had to get out of the Health Care Czar role quickly.... there is no reason to think that she would be anything but an abysmal president.

J. Bradford DeLong
professor of economics, Berkeley
clinton Administration veteran

for the birds
(THE INCOMPETENCE OF HILLARY CLINTON)
by Mia T, 11.13.05
(viewing movie requires Flash Player 7, available HERE)

 

Hillary Clinton?
Who would even know her name were it not for her attachment to a man?

Thank you, Gavin McNett, for your tribute to the incomparable Tammy Wynette. (TAMMY WYNETTE, 1942-1998)

Too many pundits, usually leftist and privileged, sneer at country music. To these critics, any music created by poor, Southern whites (at least those poor, Southern whites who didn't attend an Ivy League university) must be held in contempt, along with its correlatives: incest, racism and trailer parks.

Hillary Clinton? Who would even know her name were it not for her attachment to a man? Where would she be now if she as a child had to pick cotton from sun up to sun down?

Tammy Wynette stands alone, a legend; and she will be admired wherever people appreciate the honesty of the human experience. Human beings are vulnerable. We all should be thankful to any artist courageous enough to bare her soul on the public stage so the rest of us who are listening and know whereof she speaks might benefit.

READ MORE

hillary's vaccine shortage, the avian flu, pandemic, terrorism, hillary clinton, bill clinton, bird flu

IT TAKES A CLINTON TO RAZE A COUNTRY

by Mia T, 11.14.05

(viewing movie requires Flash Player 7, available HERE)

for the birds (movie)
(THE INCOMPETENCE OF HILLARY CLINTON) (essay)


HILLARY FLUNKED D.C. BAR EXAM
"the smartest woman in the world" sought less competitive venue


HILLARY!?? WHAT IS THIS MORIBUND LOSER DOING IN THE POLITICAL ARENA, ANYWAY? (bill's bud explains)


KLEIN BOOK CAUSES HILLARY TO (oops!) CONFIRM "THE TRUTH ABOUT HILLARY"
CLINTON'S REACTION EXPOSES FASCISTIC MINDSET, TEXTBOOK CASE OF PARANOIA + MEGALOMANIA, AND A CONSCIOUSNESS OF GUILT IN BROADDRICK RAPE


1st Feminist Prez Impeached
(clinton, pushed by the "smartest woman in the world," managed to impeach himself)


THE ABSURDITY OF A COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF HILLARY


WHY HILLARY MUST NOT WIN. WHY HILLARY CANNOT WIN.


SCHEMA PINOCCHIO
how the clintons are handling the hillary dud factor


REINVENTING HILLARY... AGAIN
(clinton machine dumps Geena Davis for Margaret Thatcher)
how the clintons are handling the hillary dud factor₂


AN OPEN LETTER TO TIM ROBBINS, DAVID GEFFEN, CHRIS MATTHEWS, MAUREEN DOWD + JEANINE PIRRO
RE: a not-so-modest proposal concerning hillary clinton


IMPERIOUS HILLARY
(THE REPORTS OF HER DEATH ARE GREATLY UNDERSTATED)


hillary's burqa


HILLARY'S COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF PROBLEM
(see descriptor morphs)


HILLARY IN AVIARY


hillary clinton is a "CONGENITAL LIAR"
("I am not a crook")


retrograde feminist fraud positions herself as victim (again) in order to win White House
[FOOL ME ONCE, SHAME ON YOU! FOOL ME TWICE, SHAME ON ME!]


NOTE THE SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCE IN CLINTON REACTION TIME AND CONTENT TO THE TWO RAPE CHARGES


CATCHING THE CONSCIENCE OF THE KINGFISH
differential reaction to the two rape charges snares the clintons


the clinton-clinton-Broaddrick kind of rape, according to Susan Estrich


HEAR CHRIS MATTHEWS + MAUREEN DOWD DEVOUR HILLARY

 

 

COPYRIGHT MIA T 2006

[Mia T]

Definitely. On both counts. ;)

[Mia T]

thx :)

It appears that Hillary's star is fading. She would be a disastrous first female president and would likely set back the entire gender for many a year.--Faith

[malia]

"I really wish people would take a chill pill and accept that a Clinton will never ever sit in the oval office ever again, under any circumstances.

I wish I could be as certain of that as you seem to be. But I'm not!!!!!

[Mia T]

Thanx, Malia.

Being pc about 'hate' is just an extension on all the non-judgmental stuff that made possible the rise of these two despicable people. (Did you, in your wildest dreams, ever imagine that a pair of documented serial rapists would not be booted out forthwith once the Broaddrick rape was exposed?)

Personally, after what these two creatures have done to women, to our children, to our country, to the Constitution and to us all, if you want to hate them, that's fine with me.

[Mia T]

As for hillary 'putting together' the show, recall that the show's head writer is a veteran of clinton campaigns and hillary's press office.

[Mia T]

bump! What is needed is not cool efficiency, but redundant effort. We've got to make sure that these two never ever again get control of this country.

[Sonny M]

As for hillary 'putting together' the show, recall that the show's head writer is a veteran of clinton campaigns and hillary's press office.

No wonder the show flopped.

She is just as bad at hiring hacks as she at public speaking.

If Hillary did have a hand in this show, I'm sure they would have done something, anything, to make Geena Davis's character look more presidential and solid and strong, as opposed to the way the character was portrayed.

Ironically, if this show had lasted to 2008, I think it would set back any chance of a woman being POTUS by about 20 years.

Funny story, supposedly some staff members for the junior senator from virgina were hoping the show would be a hit and the main characters name would become a household word.

lol.

[Mia T]

Actually, I think you're exactly right about their goal to make the Prez strong and solid.
In fact, my theory of the show is that they originally modeled the character AFTER CONDI.

• Why ABC's "Commander-in-Chief" is a Condi Rice clone
  
  
  
• THE "COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF" AIN'T HILLARY (with afterword)
  
  
  
• HILLARY'S COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF PROBLEM
  (see descriptor morphs)
  
  
  
• THE ABSURDITY OF A COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF HILLARY
  
  
  

 

It isn't that they can't see the solution. It is that they can't see the problem.

G. K. Chesterton

 

... While America appears not to be ready for a female president under any circumstances, the post-9/11 realities pose special problems for a female presidential candidate. Add to these the problems unique to missus clinton. The reviews make the mistake of focusing on the problems of the generic female presidential candidate running during ordinary times.

These are not ordinary times. America is waging the global War on Terror; the uncharted territory of asymmetric netherworlds is the battlefield; the enemy is brutal, subhuman; the threat of global conflagration is real.

Defeating the enemy isn't sufficient. For America to prevail, she must also defeat a retrograde, misogynous mindset. To successfully prosecute the War on Terror, it is essential that the collective patriarchal islamic culture perceives America as politically and militarily strong.
Condi Rice excepted, this requirement presents an insurmountable hurdle for any female presidential candidate, and especially missus clinton, historically antimilitary--(an image, incidentally, that is only enhanced today by her clumsy, termagant parody of Thatcher), forever the pitiful victim, and, according to Dick Morris, "the biggest dove in the clinton administration."

It is ironic that had the clintons not failed utterly to fight terrorism... not failed to take bin Laden from Sudan... not failed repeatedly to decapitate a nascent, still stoppable al Qaeda... the generic female president as a construct would still be viable... missus clinton's obstacles would be limited largely to standard-issue clintonisms: corruption, abuse, malpractice, malfeasance, megalomania, rape and treason... and, in spite of Juanita Broaddrick, or perhaps because of her, Rod Lurie would be reduced to perversely hawking the "First Gentleman" instead of the "Commander-in-Chief."

Mia T, 10.02.05
HILLARY'S COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF PROBLEM
(see descriptor morphs)

[Mia T]

Why ABC's "Commander-in-Chief" is a Condi Rice clone (with additions)

 

 

 

by Mia T, 9.28.05

 

(viewing requires Flash Player 7, available HERE)

STEP 1

 

The Hotline also polled on some questions concerning 2008. In their poll, Hillary Clinton has a positive approval rating of 48 to 44 percent.

By contrast, Condoleezza Rice has a 59 to 25 percent approval rating.

By an overwhelming percentage of 85 to 9, respondents said they would be comfortable supporting a female candidate for the White House. And by a greater margin, 86 to 4 percent, participants said they would vote to support an African-American candidate who was well qualified.

Rice also strongly outpolls Clinton on all national security questions: who is stronger on national security issues, ability to handle an international crisis, ability to protect the U.S. from a terrorist attack, ability to manage Iraq and ability to be a "strong and decisive" leader.

The Power fo Rice
National Review Online
June 14, 2004
Eric Pfeiffer

ommander-in-Chief" Mackenzie Allen is a carefully crafted Condi-Rice clone. She is not hillary clinton. Indeed, she is specifically antihillary.

This can mean only one thing: hillary clinton and her agitprop machine have determined that missus clinton, the construct, is unelectable.

Because ABC is part of the permanent clinton agitprop, because the "Commander-in Chief" head writer is a veteran of clinton campaigns and hillary's press office, because the show has been perfectly positioned to desensitize the electorate to the notion of a woman president just in time for hillary, because of all of the above, one would not expect ABC to model the show's protagonist after hillary clinton's infinitely more qualified potential rival.

So why has it done just that?

"Commander-in-Chief" is electoral legerdemain. It is yet another clinton two-step intended to fool the voters. It is designed to:

1. desensitize them to the concept of a female president, using a highly qualified exemplar, the Condi-Rice clone

   These are not ordinary times. America is waging the global War on Terror; the uncharted territory of asymmetric netherworlds is the battlefield; the enemy is brutal, subhuman; the threat of global conflagration is real.

Defeating the enemy isn't sufficient. For America to prevail, she must also defeat a retrograde, misogynous mindset. To successfully prosecute the War on Terror, it is essential that the collective patriarchal islamic culture perceives America as politically and militarily strong. Condi Rice excepted, this requirement presents an insurmountable hurdle for any female presidential candidate, and especially missus clinton, historically antimilitary--(an image, incidentally, that is only enhanced today by her clumsy, termagant parody of Thatcher), forever the pitiful victim, and, according to Dick Morris, "the biggest dove in the clinton administration."

1. bait and switch; conflate the highly qualified, electable Condi-Rice clone with the highly unqualified, unelectable hillary clinton

    

   
   
   (viewing requires Flash Player 7, available HERE)
   
   STEP2
   

    

    

    

ALL HILLARY, ALL THE TIME...

This is not to say the series isn't ALL about hillary. You just don't SEE hillary.

You don't see hillary's looming presence.

You don't see her smallness. Her haughty distain. Her flat affect.

You don't see her corruption. Her ineptitude. Her banality.

You don't see her rage. Her coldness.

You don't see her abusiveness. Her vulgarity. Her stridency.

You don't see her extremism. Her balkanizing. Her lust for power.

You don't see the harridan. You don't see the Hildabeast.

 

SHELL GAME

What you do see is Condi, Condi in a President Allen "shell."

You see a President Allen who is idealistic, is accomplished in her own right, does not crave power, has a nonpartisan streak, is an intellectual, an expert in Mideast policy, was plucked from the chancellorship of a great university, speaks with a quiet strength.

You see a President Allen who even looks like Condi Rice. The strong bone structure, the wideset intelligent brown eyes, the full lips, the brunette, retro flip, (aka 'power flip' post-Condi), the great figure. And perhaps definitively, the legs.

It would be naive to think that this wasn't a precise clinton calculation, what with her main man the lead writer 'n all.

At first I thought it was a feint. If "Commander-in-Chief" is a too-transparent hillary infomercial, ABC's agenda will certainly backfire. Perhaps that was the initial reasoning and explains why, for example, gorgeous Geena Davis and not some squat bottle-blonde matron, was cast in the lead.

 

HOLLYWOOD-DC RATIONALE

But in the end, there are two reasons (corresponding to the two relevant cities, Hollywood and DC) for the Condi clone, for Condi in a President Allen "shell."

The first is that Hollywood typecasts. Condi is presidential and hillary is a fishwife.

And the second is the thesis, above, that hillary clinton and her agitprop machine have determined that missus clinton, the construct, (missus clinton, "as is,") is unelectable, and so they will desensitize and bait and switch.

They will desensitize the electorate to the concept of a female president, (using a highly qualified exemplar, the Condi-Rice clone because they have determined that a hillary exemplar would be rejected, that, indeed, given the post-9/11 realities, Condi Rice is perhaps the only female exemplar that would work.)

Then they will bait and switch; conflate the highly qualified, electable Condi-Rice clone with the highly unqualified, unelectable hillary clinton. Indeed, the clinton conflation ploy to make hillary acceptable to the voter is already a clinton standard operating procedure, witness missus clinton's address to the Democratic Leadership Council in Columbus, Ohio in July.

see:
SCHEMA PINOCCHIO
how the clintons are handling the hillary dud factor

 

 

[Mia T]

fyi

[Mia T]

Pls excuse my lack of clarity. I was in no way implying that you are pc or that I encourage hate. My point is simply that I can understand why someone would hate those two. Personally, I believe as you do: hating is a waste of energy.

[Mia T]

Sandy Berger's place in history is secure.
A more slovenly traitor there will never be.

Clinton's failure to grasp the opportunity to unravel increasingly organized extremists, coupled with Berger's assessments of their potential to directly threaten the U.S., represents one of the most serious foreign policy failures in American history.

Clinton Let Bin Laden Slip Away and Metastasize
MANSOOR IJAZ
December 5, 2001

 

I M P E A C H M E N T
h e a r --c l i n t o n --l o s e --i t


by Mia T, 11.11.05

This legacy confab is in and of itself proof certain of clinton's deeply flawed character, and a demonstration in real time of the way in which the clinton years were about a legacy that was incidentally a presidency.

Madeleine Albright captured the essence of this dysfunctional presidency best when she explained why clinton couldn't go after bin Laden.

According to Richard Miniter, the Albright revelation occurred at the cabinet meeting that would decide the disposition of the USS Cole bombing by al Qaeda [that is to say, that would decide to do what it had always done when a "bimbo" was not spilling the beans on the clintons: Nothing]. Only Clarke wanted to retaliate militarily for this unambiguous act of war.

Albright explained that a [sham] Mideast accord would yield [if not peace for the principals, surely] a Nobel Peace Prize for clinton. Kill or capture bin Laden and clinton could kiss the 'accord' and the Peace Prize good-bye.

If clinton liberalism, smallness, cowardice, corruption, perfidy--and, to borrow a phrase from Andrew Cuomo, clinton cluelessness--played a part, it was, in the end, the Nobel Peace Prize that produced the puerile pertinacity that enabled the clintons to shrug off terrorism's global danger.

READ MORE

[Mia T]

CORRECTION:
'bait and switch' should be #2, not #1.

[malia]

a Friday night bump

[The Foolkiller]

Is the son as openly left-wing nuts as the dad?

---

Maybe, but it doesn't matter to me-because he has the intelligence to keep his mouth shut. I do think they're both magnificent actors, though, regardless (or in spite of) politics.