Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mightier Than The Sword? (Vanity)
Vanity ^ | 3 Feb 2006 | ,cnI redruM

Posted on 02/03/2006 5:04:00 AM PST by .cnI redruM

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last
http://www.humaneventsonline.com/sarticle.php?id=12146 - A link to the anti-Muslim Cartoons.

http://michellemalkin.com/archives/004440.htm - A link to Malkin's post in asimilar vein.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piss_Christ - Since it's Friday, you might even be able to stand Serrano (included to put my comments in proper context, not to support his continued "art".)

1 posted on 02/03/2006 5:04:01 AM PST by .cnI redruM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM

If there was a concerted world-wide effort to insult muslims would they totally flip out and become impotent as a group?

Look at the results of one cartoon.


2 posted on 02/03/2006 5:44:53 AM PST by CPOSharky (Insanity: Doing the same thing over and over expecting different results. Like demoncrats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
As I argue in my forthcoming book, "America's Victories: Why Americans Win Wars and Will Win the War on Terror," (May, Sentinel), "protestors actually make soldiers better." Follow me:

Our free press and freedoms that allow loonies like Cindy Sheehan have completely failed at making the U.S. public "concerned" over either collateral damage or the destruction normally reaped in warfare. Therefore, since 1960, virtually ALL anti-war efforts have emphasized our casualties and the harms to our society.

This, however, has not reduced our involvement in wars (in my view, all of them just) but HAS changed our military's effectiveness, because even more than WW I (and this was huge after WW I), we have become even more sensitive to taking casualties. But rather than making us wimps, it has made our troops the best trained, most efficient, best armored, and best supported military forces in human history.

The exposition in the book is longer, but you get the point: the anti-war nuts have actually made our troopers and sailors and airmen DEADLIER, and resulted in even fewer dying.

3 posted on 02/03/2006 5:45:02 AM PST by LS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CPOSharky
They might be goaded into stupidity. I wonder if our PsyOps people in Iraq have tried anything similar? Just put something out there and attempt to make the insurgents act like idiots and lose credibility.
4 posted on 02/03/2006 5:47:39 AM PST by .cnI redruM (Shame, not sanctions - UN policy on Iran)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
Sorry, I have to ...

"Alex, I'll take the penis mighty for $20"

5 posted on 02/03/2006 5:48:02 AM PST by tx_eggman (Unforgiveness is like eating rat poison and expecting the other person to get sick.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
I will say that the pen is still mightier than the sword, but cowards like CNN who refuse to stand and fight (or, stand and "write") will never know for certain.

What has made the pen mightier than the sword is those people throughout history who cared more for the power of their ideas than for the safety of their own skins. The person may be persecuted, injured, imprisoned, or killed, but the idea lives on and eventually emerges victorious over those who may have destroyed the idea's originator.

It's a natural human reaction to be concerned with self-preservation. But if these people and publications truly believe in their self-given titles as defenders of free speech, then they may have to risk pain, humiliation, or even death in order to make that fight. Turning tail and cowering, for any reason, makes them hypocrites.

The correct reaction to this "furor" is for every news organization in the world to run the cartoons. Firstly, it is a major news story. Secondly, they need to present a united "don't **** with us" attitude that they will not be cowed or censored. So, since we know the correct approach, we can also predict what CNN will do: just the opposite.

(((Sigh)))

6 posted on 02/03/2006 5:48:45 AM PST by kevkrom ("...no one has ever successfully waged a war against stupidity" - Orson Scott Card)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LS
So by raising the level of concern over us taking casualties, these people have made the military up-armor humvees and purchase body armor faster? Maybe, however, some who lead our troops into battle would certainly take offense to the notion that they didn't care whether their soldiers made it back until Jack Murtha and Cindy Sheehan asked them to.
7 posted on 02/03/2006 5:50:00 AM PST by .cnI redruM (Shame, not sanctions - UN policy on Iran)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: tx_eggman
BWAHHH! Sorry. The answer was "Who is Dirk Diggler?"
8 posted on 02/03/2006 5:51:25 AM PST by .cnI redruM (Shame, not sanctions - UN policy on Iran)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: kevkrom
I don't see the united, don't censor us" attitude. Not from CNN, not from Google in China.
9 posted on 02/03/2006 5:52:56 AM PST by .cnI redruM (Shame, not sanctions - UN policy on Iran)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
And that's my sad point. CNN, Google, and the rest should unleash the power that they have, rather than allow themselves to be intimidated by rioters or repressive governments.

Sadly, we've long known we can't trust CNN ("we'll supress news so we can get access") on this score. Google is now singing the same, capitulating, tune.

10 posted on 02/03/2006 5:57:17 AM PST by kevkrom ("...no one has ever successfully waged a war against stupidity" - Orson Scott Card)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
BWAHHH! Sorry. The answer was "Who is Dirk Diggler?"

For those who haven't had the pleasure:

Classic Jeopardy

11 posted on 02/03/2006 6:03:30 AM PST by tx_eggman (Unforgiveness is like eating rat poison and expecting the other person to get sick.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: tx_eggman

That was funny...


12 posted on 02/03/2006 6:11:23 AM PST by .cnI redruM (Shame, not sanctions - UN policy on Iran)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM

Yep. Cnn will not republish the cartoons 'out of respect for Islam' but has not problem showing hostages, flag-burnings, bodies hanging from bridges or publishing National Security secrets (even thought the Times did it first)

Yep, fair and balanced, my a$$.


13 posted on 02/03/2006 6:19:56 AM PST by SueRae
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM

Not exactly the connection, but the fact is that since the Civil War, CIVILIAN concerns over casualties have pressured the military to steadily address battlefield casualties. You're welcome to read the primary sources from the Army in WW I where there are regular references to the CIVILIAN outcry about casualties.


14 posted on 02/03/2006 7:20:12 AM PST by LS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: tx_eggman

Beat me to it...so to speak.


15 posted on 02/03/2006 7:21:34 AM PST by countorlock (But thy strong Hours indignant work'd their wills, And beat me down and marr'd and wasted me,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: LS
Americans Win Wars

Here's your problem. America hasn't won a war in 61 years.

16 posted on 02/03/2006 7:22:49 AM PST by Flavius Josephus (Enemy Idealogies: Pacifism, Liberalism, and Feminism, Islamic Supremacism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Flavius Josephus

Here's your problem: you believe that nonsense.


17 posted on 02/03/2006 7:24:32 AM PST by LS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM

I was channel surfing a day or two ago, and I was just passin' through CNN when I say a teaser that talked about how the Muslims have had it (with anti-Muslims slights). I wonder if it should be renamed the Crescent News Network.


18 posted on 02/03/2006 7:41:33 AM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Jack Murtha: America's best-known EX-marine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LS

Come now, it's an objective fact. No one won Korea, we lost Vietnam, GW1 we let Saddam get up and keep on keeping on... And this war isn't won yet. It's not nonsense.


19 posted on 02/03/2006 8:03:15 AM PST by Flavius Josephus (Enemy Idealogies: Pacifism, Liberalism, and Feminism, Islamic Supremacism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Flavius Josephus

The stated military goal of the First Gulf War was to eject The Iraqi Army from Kuwait. The Iraqi Army was forcibly ejected. Therefore, The US and it's coalition won.


20 posted on 02/03/2006 8:22:08 AM PST by .cnI redruM (Shame, not sanctions - UN policy on Iran)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson