Skip to comments.
US analog TV switch-off in 2009
BBC ^
| 2/2/06
| n/a
Posted on 02/02/2006 11:01:53 AM PST by kiriath_jearim
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-147 next last
To: kiriath_jearim
I'm technologically deficient; what does this mean for the average consumer?
2
posted on
02/02/2006 11:03:53 AM PST
by
Peach
To: kiriath_jearim
Well, it is important to keep people mindless so Congress can keep doing its thing.
3
posted on
02/02/2006 11:05:03 AM PST
by
kenth
Comment #4 Removed by Moderator
To: kiriath_jearim

As long as I can still get the Lone Ranger program on my TV, no problemo.
5
posted on
02/02/2006 11:07:04 AM PST
by
OB1kNOb
(Aiding, abetting, or harboring illegal aliens is itself illegal and punishable by law.)
To: kiriath_jearim
$1.5 bn of pork for electronics manufacturers.
6
posted on
02/02/2006 11:09:27 AM PST
by
sumocide
To: Peach
It means that those with out A digital converter will get no TV reception. Most Digital TV is Cable so those without cable are hosed.... either way you are looking at laying out money either to buy a new TV or to buy a converter.
here is a link that covers the tech aspect... pretty good for PBS.
http://www.pbs.org/opb/crashcourse/
7
posted on
02/02/2006 11:16:58 AM PST
by
SouthernBoyupNorth
("For my wings are made of Tungsten, my flesh of glass and steel..........")
To: SouthernBoyupNorth
Hey, thanks for that information!
8
posted on
02/02/2006 11:18:12 AM PST
by
Peach
To: kiriath_jearim
>>> each family will be entitled to $80 <<<<
And Who pays for that.
Why do I need HD to watch crap?
To: Peach
"I'm technologically deficient; what does this mean for the average consumer?"
That means that unless you are one of the protected minorities, you don't get the funds to convert, YOU have to buy your own TVs. If you have 3 or 4 in the house like most of us, you my friend are on your own and SOL.
10
posted on
02/02/2006 11:20:27 AM PST
by
hophead
("Enjoy Every Sandwich")
To: kiriath_jearim
US analog TV switch-off in 2009
We're all gonna die!!!!
11
posted on
02/02/2006 11:21:10 AM PST
by
Lazamataz
(I have a Chinese family renting an apartment from me. They are lo mein tenants.)
To: kiriath_jearim
The US Congress has approved plans to force broadcasters to switch off their analogue television signals by 2009. So much for free enterprise, and a free market.
Paging George Orwell.... pick up white courtesy phone.
12
posted on
02/02/2006 11:22:59 AM PST
by
Cobra64
To: SouthernBoyupNorth
What about those with Dish systems? Does the current box convert?
To: sumocide
As an electronicophile and videophile, I LOVE HDTV and all that comes with it.
However, I don't think Congress needs to spend $1.5 billion to implement it...
14
posted on
02/02/2006 11:26:32 AM PST
by
RockinRight
(Attention RNC...we're the party of Reagan, not FDR...)
To: Peach
what does this mean for the average consumer? 1)In less than 3 years, your current TV won't work unless you buy a converter box; even if you do buy a box, your remote control, picture-in-picture (if you have that) and other features that you paid extra for won't work.
2)Don't buy a TV between now and then. In a best case scenario, you'll pay extra now for an analog tuner in it that you won't use after that date; in a worst case scenario, you'll have to buy extra hardware ('digital ready' may or may not mean that it actually has a digital tuner built in). And, if close to the end of the conversion period, you buy a digital only set, you may find that the cut-over date has been moved into the future.
3)You will probably have to get cable or a satellite dish if you don't already have one. The reach of digital signals is not as far as existing signals. (Now, in the suburbs, a weak signal might give you some snow; after conversion, a weak signal will give you a blank screen).
4)Your picture quality probably won't show a noticeable improvement. Digital doesn't necessarily mean high definition. The broadcaster can choose to give you a quality about like what you have now, and split the allocated spectrum to use the rest of it for other income-producing activities.
It's one of the biggest scams that's been put over on the American people this century.
15
posted on
02/02/2006 11:27:02 AM PST
by
PAR35
To: PAR35
My husband has thought this was a huge scam too and that our conservative Congress is giving us this "gift" is really too much.
16
posted on
02/02/2006 11:30:07 AM PST
by
Peach
To: quietolong
Why do I need HD to watch crap?HD is different from digital. Digital, in addition to carrying the information in a binary package, leaves room for other information in the bandwidth used to carry the signal, such as data describing the programming.
HD transmission is made possible by digital, but is by now means the only thing digital carries.
17
posted on
02/02/2006 11:30:51 AM PST
by
SlowBoat407
(The best stuff happens just before the thread snaps.)
To: Peach
government help has been pledged for those aged over 75 and with disabilities towards the cost of conversion. Oh good grief. Since when did entertainment become a basic human right that has to be paid for by my tax dollars??
18
posted on
02/02/2006 11:31:35 AM PST
by
meowmeow
(This tagline left intentionally blank.)
To: Pondman88
Satellite TV is a totally different animal.
All the converters do is take the digital signal and transform it into either an RF signal (so it can go in thorough the regular coaxial cable input on your TV on Channel 3 or 4 like a VCR), or to an RCA input (the three-part yellow/red/white plug-in cables) or S-video input.
DISH converters already have these inputs, and the satellite transmission to your dish and your box is independent of how the broadcasters give them the signal.
In other words, it's mostly DISH Network and DirecTV's problem. Anyone with cable or satellite will be relatively unaffected except for maybe a rate increase. If you want to actually see the content in true HD format, THEN you'd have to buy a new TV. Otherwise it will only look somewhat sharper, but not truly high-definition on a regular TV set.
19
posted on
02/02/2006 11:31:41 AM PST
by
RockinRight
(Attention RNC...we're the party of Reagan, not FDR...)
To: quietolong
And Who pays for that. You do. I'd thank you, but I need 4 (one for each set), so I'll be busy picketing The Man.
20
posted on
02/02/2006 11:32:04 AM PST
by
PAR35
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-147 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson