Skip to comments.
Deputy Shooting Of Military Police Officer Under Investigation
NBC TV ^
Posted on 01/31/2006 9:30:19 AM PST by ozoneliar
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
California's attempts to undermine the Armed Forces continues :)
1
posted on
01/31/2006 9:30:22 AM PST
by
ozoneliar
To: ozoneliar
I watched the video and it does not support your conclusion. The soldier was a passenger in a car that was running from police. The driver and passenger were going to the store for more booze when the family party they were at ran out. The police officer had the soldier on the ground and told him to stay there. The soldier was cursing at the police officer and started to rise and the officer shot him.
Moral: If you are being held at gunpoint on the ground in a scary neighborhood after being caught committing a crime, do exactly what the officer tells you to do.
2
posted on
01/31/2006 9:35:38 AM PST
by
Ben Mugged
(Television is the most perfect democracy, You sit there with your remote control and vote")
To: Ben Mugged
He just started to rise and the officer shot him?
3
posted on
01/31/2006 9:42:07 AM PST
by
kenth
To: Ben Mugged
The soldier was cursing at the police officer and started to rise and the officer shot him. Seems like he skipped several steps in the escalation of force continuum. You cant just shoot people because they dont follow your orders.
4
posted on
01/31/2006 10:16:40 AM PST
by
usurper
(Spelling or grammatical errors in this post can be attributed to the LA City School System)
To: usurper
Another pyscho cop. where are they hiring these jokers?
It's not a capital offense to disobey a cop.... and drunks tend to disobey...
why wasn't he cuffed?
5
posted on
01/31/2006 10:22:03 AM PST
by
adjuster
To: usurper
I only know what I saw on the local news this morning. The officer was alone in a bad part of town. He was at the end of a high speed pursuit. He had two perps on the ground. If an officer has told you to remain on the ground and you refuse to comply, does the officer have grounds for the use of force? By the way, the soldier was in civilian clothes so the original posters supposition that "California's attempts to undermine the Armed Forces continues :) " was not supported by the evidence.
6
posted on
01/31/2006 10:25:18 AM PST
by
Ben Mugged
(Television is the most perfect democracy, You sit there with your remote control and vote")
To: albertp; Allosaurs_r_us; Abram; AlexandriaDuke; Americanwolf; Annie03; Baby Bear; bassmaner; ...

Libertarian ping.To be added or removed from my ping list freepmail me or post a message here
7
posted on
01/31/2006 10:37:16 AM PST
by
freepatriot32
(Holding you head high & voting Libertarian is better then holding your nose and voting republican)
To: ozoneliar
Hmmm. As stated the LEO did not appear to be justified in the use of lethal force, but I'll betcha this gets tagged a "clean shoot."
8
posted on
01/31/2006 11:19:48 AM PST
by
xsrdx
(Diligentia, Vis, Celeritas)
To: ozoneliar
Also, the USAF has Security Police, or SP's, not MP's.
9
posted on
01/31/2006 11:22:15 AM PST
by
xsrdx
(Diligentia, Vis, Celeritas)
To: Ben Mugged
California's attempts to undermine the Armed Forces continues :) was not supported by the evidence. Had ozoneilar possessed the HTML skills to post; California's attempts to undermine the Armed Forces continues </sarcasm> instead of :), would the allegation that the reply was not supported by the evidence have still applied?
To: Ben Mugged
"California's attempts to undermine the Armed Forces continues :) " was not supported by the evidence. I was being sarcastic/joking;thus the ':)'.
11
posted on
01/31/2006 11:36:54 AM PST
by
ozoneliar
("The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots & tyrants" -T.J.)
To: xsrdx
Actually, the USAF now has Security Forces, reflecting that they do both law enforcement and force protection.
12
posted on
01/31/2006 11:41:17 AM PST
by
jagusafr
(The proof that we are rightly related to God is that we do our best whether we feel inspired or not")
To: jagusafr
Actually, the USAF now has Security Forces. So they're Air Force SF's now? I'll bet Army SF is not amused.
13
posted on
01/31/2006 11:46:56 AM PST
by
xsrdx
(Diligentia, Vis, Celeritas)
To: Ben Mugged
If an officer has told you to remain on the ground and you refuse to comply, does the officer have grounds for the use of force? Sure but not deadly force. Most all law enforcement officers can use deadly force only in 3 circumstances. 1) To protect themselves from death or grievous bodily harm. 2) To protect their partner from the same. 3) To protect an innocent third party.
In deciding whether an officer was justified in using deadly force the courts generally look at several factors. 1. The intent of the individual to do harm. 2. The capacity of the individual to do harm.
In other words, if I am standing 50 yards away from an officer holding a knife telling him I want to kill him, he cant use deadly force because while I may have the intent, I lack the capacity at 50 yards to harm him.
From what you described it sounds like this officer is in for a long legal battle.
14
posted on
01/31/2006 1:37:01 PM PST
by
usurper
(Spelling or grammatical errors in this post can be attributed to the LA City School System)
To: usurper
Sure but not deadly force. Most all law enforcement officers can use deadly force only in 3 circumstances. 1) To protect themselves from death or grievous bodily harm. 2) To protect their partner from the same. 3) To protect an innocent third party. How soon we forget what happened in Fulton County Georgia on March 11, 2005 -
Brian Nichols is accused of overpowering a deputy and stealing her gun, then killing Judge Rowland Barnes, who was presiding over Nichols' rape trial, and his court reporter. A sheriff's deputy was killed outside the courthouse, and a federal agent was killed elsewhere before Nichols was taken into custody the day after the rampage.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
It is an imperative for citizens to NOT present themselves as a threat to LEO's. If you read through my posts on contraband substances - you will find that I am a Libertarian at heart - but I assure you that threatening a LEO is one of the last things that I would contemplate. I advise all that it is a big mistake to jeopardize an officer of the law's safety.
15
posted on
01/31/2006 6:41:53 PM PST
by
winston2
(In matters of necessity let there be unity, in matters of doubt liberty, and in all things charity.)
To: ozoneliar; SFC Chromey
This story is very disturbing. An MP (SP or SF) are usually well trained and known what not to do in a situation like this. I watched the video several times and I thought for sure the officer was asking the guy to stand up. It also looked like the officer just suddenly panicked.
My husband is an MP. Hubby, what can you say about this?
To: xsrdx
Well, I think they're still annoyed that everybody gets to wear a black beret (don't GET me started).
17
posted on
02/01/2006 9:50:20 AM PST
by
jagusafr
(The proof that we are rightly related to God is that we do our best whether we feel inspired or not")
To: Maximus_Ridiculousness
the officer was asking the guy to stand up. Sounded like that to me also, but others have theorized the officer was saying, "don't STAND UP", which would put the airman's actions in a different light.
18
posted on
02/01/2006 9:58:49 AM PST
by
xsrdx
(Diligentia, Vis, Celeritas)
To: usurper
Seems like he skipped several steps in the escalation of force continuum. You cant just shoot people because they dont follow your orders. You have my most humble apology!
I watched the video of this shooting last night and saw for myself that the police told the U.S. airman to "get up" "get up". As the U.S. airman was getting up - not even off his knees - the policeman shot the U.S. airman 4 times and then started screaming profanities at the airman. It was clearly a case of attempted murder. I'm sorry for my uninformed presumptuous remarks. I usually don't speak without better information.
I can just see a several million dollar law suit coming in favor of the U.S. airman - and it will be justice.
19
posted on
02/02/2006 5:48:18 AM PST
by
winston2
(In matters of necessity let there be unity, in matters of doubt liberty, and in all things charity.)
To: Ben Mugged
The soldier was cursing at the police officer and started to rise and the officer shot him. SBLEO - "I said get up!"
AFLEO - getting up
SBLEO - BLAM! BLAM! BLAM!
AFLEO - Falls, "Moan, groan,"
Bystander - "You told him to get up!"
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson