Skip to comments.
Sexual orientation is flexible, right?
Alain's Newsletter ^
| 01/28/2006
| alainsnewsletter
Posted on 01/28/2006 8:31:07 PM PST by geekerfx
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
1
posted on
01/28/2006 8:31:07 PM PST
by
geekerfx
To: geekerfx
Welcome to Free Republic.
To: geekerfx
Sexual orientation is flexible, right? Not according to DNA. :)
Welcome to FR.
3
posted on
01/28/2006 8:36:07 PM PST
by
DJ MacWoW
(If you think you know what's coming next....You don't know Jack.)
To: geekerfx; Admin Moderator
IBTZ considering this quote from the site,
Everything said here has already been stated extensively by those trying to change traditional marriage.
To: perfect stranger
He should come to Washington state, he won't have any problems. The legislature just included gays and lesbians in the anti-discrimination law.
5
posted on
01/28/2006 8:38:35 PM PST
by
jazusamo
(A Progressive is only a Socialist in a transparent disguise.)
Comment #6 Removed by Moderator
To: jazusamo
7
posted on
01/28/2006 8:45:08 PM PST
by
MrEdd
To: jazusamo
I'll give 'em the benefit of the doubt if they answer anytime soon, but I'll also bet one dollar that they won't respond at all.
To: geekerfx
No.
Case in point straights.
To: geekerfx
To: Deepkimche
I really do believe that polygamy will be the result of the rush to homosexual marriage. How will the state be able to tell someone they cannot have multiple wives or husbands if they can marry someone of the same sex? Polygyny has far more historical precedent than "gay marriage". I see no particular reason why "gay marriage" should be acceptable but polygyny not.
The most important function of marriage is ensuring that children will have a known mother and father. Polygyny accomplishes this; polyandry and gay marriage do not.
11
posted on
01/28/2006 8:52:04 PM PST
by
supercat
(Sony delenda est.)
To: geekerfx
Para-sexual!!! you have sex after jumping out of airplanes or with ghosts??
12
posted on
01/28/2006 8:56:57 PM PST
by
stuartcr
(Everything happens as God wants it to.....otherwise, things would be different.)
Comment #13 Removed by Moderator
To: Deepkimche
14
posted on
01/28/2006 9:28:51 PM PST
by
HonduGOP
To: geekerfx
Female: Judy, Jane, Elizabeth, Sally, Erica and Hillary
Hillary? Hillary? Aaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhh!!!
15
posted on
01/28/2006 9:38:53 PM PST
by
watchin
(Facts irritate liberals)
To: perfect stranger
Retune those satire detectors!
To: thoughtomator
Retune my sarire after almost 90 min waiting for a response from the poster that signed up just today?
To: supercat
The most important function of marriage is ensuring that children will have a known mother and father. Wrong. The courts have ruled that women have the right to deceive men as to the paternity of their children. Thus, the most important function of marriage in our society is to transfer money to women. It's merely a way to subsidize the welfare state--an excise tax on men.
To: perfect stranger
Satire doesn't depend on follow up responses.
To: thoughtomator
Especially bad satire like this.
20
posted on
01/28/2006 10:46:16 PM PST
by
JennysCool
(Non-Y2K-Compliant)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
