Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

7 Myths About The Challenger Shuttle Disaster
NBC via MSNBC ^ | January 27, 2006 | James Oberg

Posted on 01/27/2006 9:29:40 AM PST by John W

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-126 last
To: Semper Paratus

I remember walking to Chemistry Class and hearing something about it. Then when I did get to class, we did watch it on TV. I was a Junior then. It is something I will not forget. I believe MSM was not part of our life then, but CNN was and they are basically the same thing...crap.


121 posted on 01/28/2006 11:40:17 AM PST by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Dunstan McShane

And then some years later the jokes started. What does NASA stand for? Won't answer it but it is not funny. I heard quite a few of them. Terrible. I don't know why people do that. Maybe to take the pain away. I don't know.


122 posted on 01/28/2006 11:45:22 AM PST by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: John W

I remember I was working at IBM at the time, with a lot of Engineers who had previously been involved with the Space program. It hit everyone real hard...

IBM had an internal forum like FR in those days, and there was thousands of poignant tributes posted by many with close ties to the programs. Not much got done for a couple of days while everyone discussed the tragedy...


123 posted on 01/28/2006 11:54:54 AM PST by RobFromGa (Polls are for people who can't think for themselves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tang-soo

That was Senator Jake Garn:

http://www.jsc.nasa.gov/Bios/htmlbios/garn-j.html


124 posted on 01/28/2006 12:15:06 PM PST by VegasBaby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: Always Right

Many people can't recall if it was live or not when they saw it.

But, it does matter in that:
1. Some posters feel that the author's point was wrong. I don't think so.
2. By 1986, many people no longer considered shuttle launches to be worth running to the TV for. I didn't. I think it might reflect a larger complacency about the shuttle and our space program. I think this was the author's larger point; that Americans had become to accept the shuttle as "routine" and we failed to grasp the danger that is inherent in such things.

I did see the Columbia disaster "live". I woke up early (Saturday morning?) and happened to turn on the TV. I was just looking for news, not specifically the shuttle.


125 posted on 01/28/2006 1:35:29 PM PST by SJSAMPLE (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator
And then some years later the jokes started. What does NASA stand for? Won't answer it but it is not funny. I heard quite a few of them. Terrible. I don't know why people do that. Maybe to take the pain away. I don't know.

They do it because they are shmucks and do not have human hearts. Period.

126 posted on 01/30/2006 8:03:42 AM PST by Dunstan McShane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-126 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson