Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The 2003 Tax Cut on Capital Gains Entirely Paid for Itself
NRO ^ | today | Donlad Luskin

Posted on 01/27/2006 7:35:57 AM PST by Marxbites

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 last
To: Marxbites

Somehow I don't think the NYT or NPR are gonna report this...


81 posted on 01/29/2006 1:35:32 PM PST by Wheee The People
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Goddess
Thank you!

I knew it was something along those lines but just couldn't quite "get it".

You are absolutely right about that as well.

82 posted on 01/29/2006 2:04:52 PM PST by Bigun (IRS sucks @getridof it.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Marxbites

The FairTax prebate is not really a subsidy but a return of tax money paid to everyone - not just the low end. Nor is it an entitlement, boosting expenses (as do S/S & M/C which ARE subsidys.)


83 posted on 01/29/2006 3:57:54 PM PST by pigdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Goddess
The models must solve simultaneous, non-linear, differential equations at multiple loci to truly model the global economy. Mathematically speaking, it is the same problem that the global climate models must solve. If done well, it is mind-numbingly complex and limited by our current computing capacity.

The biggest problem is that we don't know what the differential equations are. Small changes make large changes in only a relatively few iterations. And we are a long way from defining these equations.

But we can easily just keep dropping the tax rate until we see no further positive impact.

84 posted on 01/29/2006 5:03:15 PM PST by RobFromGa (Polls are for people who can't think for themselves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: RobFromGa

Yes, it will take several iterations to refine the equations....but that is no reason to cling to static scoring which is WRONG 100% of the time.

With respect to reducing rates until revenues drop...that is the practical answer to the problem, which simply won't do for the inside the beltway crowd. Each bill is must be scored......http://www.urban.org/publications/1000553.html


85 posted on 01/30/2006 11:03:00 AM PST by Conservative Goddess (Politiae legibus, non leges politiis, adaptandae)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Goddess

I am in total agreement that some dynamic scoring needs to be done on tax law changes, and I am also a supply side, Laffer curve believer. With that said, I don't believe that the entire economy can be accurately modeled and there is always going to be errors made. Smaller changes are easier to estimate.


86 posted on 01/30/2006 11:06:37 AM PST by RobFromGa (Polls are for people who can't think for themselves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Marxbites

The FairTax "prebate" is not, in reality, a subsidy for anybody. It is an advance payment on the sales tax a given size family unit will pay on the necessities of life.

The prebate will be sent monthly to each family unit, irrespective of income, if they file the paperwork necessary to receive it (a form similar to the current W-4).

HST, acceptance of the prebate is optional; if one did not want to receive it, one simply would not file for it.


87 posted on 01/31/2006 8:39:38 PM PST by Taxman (So that the beautiful pressure does not diminish!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Goddess

I thought you might, just might, mind you, be "in the business."

I am Mighty Glad you like the FairTax.


88 posted on 01/31/2006 8:40:55 PM PST by Taxman (So that the beautiful pressure does not diminish!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Taxman

Sorry for the late reply, and I did see Boortz's presentation. It makes good sense to incentivise saving and investing and would be a vast improvement.

Now, what about socialist security and drug entitlements?


89 posted on 02/07/2006 9:48:38 AM PST by Marxbites (Freedom is the negation of Govt to the maximum extent possible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Marxbites

IMHO, SS, Medicare and the SS Drug plan ought to be privatized -- er, "personalized."

HST, the FairTax leaves SS, Medicare and the SS Drug plan untouched, in respect of payment protocols.

The funding for all three is rolled into the FairTax rate.

To track the benefits an employee is eligible for, one's employer would send a report to the SS Administration reporting said employee's annual FICA wages. That is how it is done now.


90 posted on 02/07/2006 7:07:30 PM PST by Taxman (So that the beautiful pressure does not diminish!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Taxman

I think I also prefer to get govt out of all their "businesses" of perverse incentives outside of the military, treaties and coining the currency.

I also favor a gold standard to fiat.

Just what is it that the states can NOT or should NOT do for themselves??

The Fed's involvement to the large degree it affects state's biz, hampers/dampens state's accountability to it voters IMHO.

Isn't/wasn't that the already reached goal of the socialist/corporatist copycats of the 30's Euro-dictators?

At least then we could vote with our feet as the Founders intended? I dare say the blue states would empty out in a hurry and all the misallocated resources would reallocate where they are treated best.

Just like they derogate "windfall profits" and "gouging", it is plainly the speech of market/economic know-nothings.

Most of here could do a better job than any Dem I've seen, and a bunch of Reps to boot.

If only the whole country would just read Hayek, like my man Ronnie did (and loved), and Thatcher too, we could re-limit the beast back to a constitutional pre-ICC, pre-Fed, pre-New Deal semblance of freedom again.

OT: Ain't it rich that beheadings are shown worlwide to enthuse the base and are cheeered, but a bomb headed Mo-ham-head cartoon is verboten.

Time for some serious vitrification, IMHO, make em glow!


91 posted on 02/08/2006 11:38:51 AM PST by Marxbites (Freedom is the negation of Govt to the maximum extent possible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson