Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iranian Threats and U.S. Action Regarding Israel
web.israelinsider.com ^ | January 22, 2006 | Rachel Neuwirth

Posted on 01/25/2006 6:39:20 AM PST by Esther Ruth

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last
To: GeorgefromGeorgia
I am convinced that the Saudi royals are less concerned about the Palestinians than they appear.

I'll go further then you. They are not concerned in the least bit tiny amount with anyone called "Palestinians".

They are concerned with the Jews.

21 posted on 01/25/2006 10:27:44 AM PST by Sabramerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Sabramerican

Can you explain your opinion?


22 posted on 01/25/2006 10:29:51 AM PST by GeorgefromGeorgia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: GeorgefromGeorgia

Just read any of the last hundreds of posts that Esther Ruth and/or sjackson have posted or the majority of my posts.


23 posted on 01/25/2006 10:34:35 AM PST by Sabramerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Sabramerican; All
"I'll go further then you. They are not concerned in the least bit tiny amount with anyone called "Palestinians"."

No truer words have been spoken.

The Palestinians are nothing more than a ruse. When the Muslims controlled these territories from 48-67 there was no such thing as a Palestinian or a Palestine. This is a group created by fiat with one goal in mind, and that is the destruction of Israel. This is an open secret which has been admitted by the various terrorist leaders over the past 4 decades.

What would happen if the Muzzies were to chase the Jews to Europe which eventually becomes Eurabia? Heck, what happens to any non-muslim in that case? I think most of us have a pretty good idea. Every place these guys gain a foothold discos, buses, pizzerias, hotels etc just start blowing up.

There are two distinct sets of rules which are operative in the Muslim world. One applies to lands presently under Muslim control and the other set applies to those soon to be under their control (pretty much the rest of the planet). I'm not too thrilled with either choice.

Since the military option hasn't worked out too well for the Muslims they're now playing the demographic card. The Quartet has laid out a roadmap which will only lead to murder and mayhem.
24 posted on 01/25/2006 11:24:50 AM PST by bereanway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: bereanway

You hit the nail on the head concerning the population card. In 30 years France, Germany and Italy will be 50% Muslim. The US has its own problems with illegal immigration primarily from Hispanic countries, but at least these people are Christians and may assimilate and become good Americans. The French have learned that their mostly Algerian immigrants will never become French as they refuse to accept French culture.

The Ottoman empire allowed non-Muslims to live peaceably, but they taxed them with special taxes. Further, in some cases like in Greece, they resorted to oppressive measures. Muslims in Spain during the Middle Ages were more tolerant of Jews than the Christians. However, countries with larger numbers of Muslims that have tolerated other faiths have a definite secular charter (Turkey and Morocco).


25 posted on 01/25/2006 11:47:16 AM PST by GeorgefromGeorgia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Sabramerican; ninenot; sittnick; steve50; Hegemony Cricket; Willie Green; Wolfie; ex-snook; FITZ; ..
US policy is that Israel can/must survive but only on the terms acceptable to Saudi Arabia.

USA as a great power MUST operate according to the rules of realpolitik. Otherwise it will cease to be a great power like imperial Spain ceased or Polish Commonwealth before XVIIIc partitions. And such development would hurt Israel as USA is its main supporter.

For example the invasion of Iran would incur such political and economic loss that America would be seriously weakened.

26 posted on 01/26/2006 6:33:57 AM PST by A. Pole (Dr. Michael Savage is in and the diagnosis is clear: "Liberalism is a Mental Disorder")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson