Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nuclear doom & gloom
WND ^ | 01-24-06 | Jim Rutz

Posted on 01/24/2006 4:52:36 PM PST by ChristianDefender

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 last
To: RightWhale; lmr; Hypervigilant; dirtboy; COEXERJ145

Before you totally dismiss it, take a gander at the link Dallas59 posted in #3. The claim has been made that an EMP can be produced without a nuclear device. PopSci had an article on this a while back, and Dallas59's linked page describes it in detail.


41 posted on 01/24/2006 7:26:13 PM PST by lesser_satan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: lesser_satan

Sorry for double post.


42 posted on 01/24/2006 7:26:40 PM PST by lesser_satan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: lesser_satan

The US carried out dozens of such tests in the Pacific to see what would happen.

EM communications were knocked out for a few hours.

The EMP threat is vastly (and I mean way extrememly vastly) overestimated.

It is is not going to fry your computer or your car's electronics or the power systems. They are not going to work for the few seconds that EM radiation overwhelms them when a bomb explodes but that is it.


43 posted on 01/24/2006 7:33:43 PM PST by JustDoItAlways
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: ChristianDefender

EMP is not a new threat. Scientists and engineers have known about this since the nuclear age began at White Sands. The signifigance of this article is the fact that "consumer electronics" would be heavily damaged, however, critical military and government equipment are well shielded.


44 posted on 01/24/2006 7:39:42 PM PST by InShanghai (I was born on the crest of a wave, and rocked in the cradle of the deep.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: glorgau

>How about the threat of one over Europe?

Europe? Why Europe? Europe isn't Iran's enemy.

If Iran explodes one such device, they'll explode it over their arch enemy Israel, not the Continent of Europe. But I don't think Iran has the gulls to do any such a thing. They're just bluffing.


45 posted on 01/24/2006 7:46:03 PM PST by TheBrotherhood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145

>EMP has been know about since the 1950's but unless a nation has an ICBM, there is no way to get a nuclear warhead over the United States high enough to create a continent wide EMP.

The United States is not Iran's enemy - Israel is. Not only is Israel their number one enemy, but it's also an easier target.

Iran is bluffing. If they had the capability they would have used it long ago.


46 posted on 01/24/2006 7:49:58 PM PST by TheBrotherhood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: TheBrotherhood
Iran is bluffing. If they had the capability they would have used it long ago.

I doubt that Iran is even blithering about using an EMP weapon. This all comes from the kooky mind of another World Nut Daily writer, Joseph Farah. He has been predicting some kind of nuclear attack on the U.S. for several years now. So far, the Iranian EMP hasn't happened, the 30+ al-Qaeda nukes haven't happened, nor has any of his other predictions.

47 posted on 01/24/2006 7:52:48 PM PST by COEXERJ145 (Despite Popular Opinion, Tom Tancredo Does Not Support Deporting Illegal Aliens.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145

He sounds like a prophet of doom wishing the United States and Israel's annihilation.


48 posted on 01/24/2006 8:31:07 PM PST by TheBrotherhood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: TheBrotherhood
He sounds like a prophet of doom wishing the United States and Israel's annihilation.

Bingo!

49 posted on 01/24/2006 8:32:24 PM PST by COEXERJ145 (Despite Popular Opinion, Tom Tancredo Does Not Support Deporting Illegal Aliens.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: JustDoItAlways

And how many communication/data systems were dependant on transistors then? How about microchips? And there were how many embedded computers controlling what???


50 posted on 01/24/2006 8:45:47 PM PST by Hypervigilant (Iran, you are next.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Stellar Dendrite

"That Muke stuned my beeber seriesly hugh!"

Mukes are Mega Nukes. Yeah thats it, I meant to type that.


51 posted on 01/24/2006 9:13:30 PM PST by Names Ash Housewares
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: lesser_satan

That is even less significant


52 posted on 01/25/2006 10:22:43 AM PST by RightWhale (pas de lieu, Rhone que nous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson