Posted on 01/23/2006 7:40:24 AM PST by Millee
Man: "C'mon honey, if we don't do it, we'll lose our health plan!"
Woman: "OK, but I didn't shave my legs this week..."
"I'd be interested in knowing how they'd verify this."
I thought the agenda was to keep government *out* of the bedroom. Is it anyone's business with whom I sleep -- or don't sleep?
UF is crossing the line here.
The subject of partners having/not having sex is not black and white.
sliding scale...
So what if my hubby and I have sex 3,4,5 times a week. Do we get a deduction in premiums?
Um....What if they want to get the kids covered? Or is that next?
What will be the impact of legalizing same sex marriage on the nation's Socialist Security system?
For every gay couple that looses one of it's partners to death - the survivor would be able to claim the benefits just as one's wife/children would.
Wouldn't this instantly balloon the demands on an already heading-for-a-train-wreck Ponzi scheme, that has, and would continue to serve as the reelection slush fund of the democRATS that foisted it upon Americans in the first place?
No wonder Dems are for it - it further increases their power to continue buying votes with redistribution.
As I remember it, under the definition of sex used in that deposition, one party to a act could be considered to be having sex while the other would not be. But I'm trying to erase the details from my mind . . .
But there followed a slippery slope driven primarily by liberalism's fetish with nondiscrimination and we have now arrived at 100% absurdity. People feel no compunction about signing a piece of paper saying they are domestic partners to grab a few bucks.
And sex, apparently...
If you have sex 345 times a week, I want to enter you in the Guiness Books.
Takes more than a hat to make a cowboy.
Cavanaugh said he had no plans to personally enforce the sex pledge. The "non-platonic" clause is "increasingly standard" in domestic partnership plans, Cavanaugh said. The clause is one of several methods used to legally ensure that an employer is only obligated to cover employees in a committed relationship, not longtime roommates.
So what's your answer then, Mr. Cavanaugh? Are you going to police it?
highly possible :~) hormone therapy works wonders.
Does oral sex qualify? Can I get benefits for my sheep?
BIngo!
Drug stores better stock up on lube...
Ask BJ Clintoon, he "did not have" a sex with that woman, he just effed her, and got away with it. And then there is, what is is, is ,is
rereading your post...LOL.
3 or 4 or 5 times...not 345, silly!
Gee, how nice of them to cut out 'abuse' by, for instance, faculty and staff who have a parent who is a farmer and want to get him or her benefits by declaring them and their parent to be domestic partners.
Sheesh!
They just ruined the best argument for recognizing domestic partnerships: that it's about household members sharing benefits, not about sex partner sharing benefits.
My mind had overloaded with the thought of it all.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.