[popdonnelly]

This is a stupid, hairsplitting argument. Abramoff didn't give any money to Democrats, but his clients did. Probably a heck of a lot more than Abramoff ever could have given the Dems. Does this version of events serve any purpose, other than to obscure what happened?

[popdonnelly]

They deserve each other.

[winner3000]

(I wrote that he gave campaign money to both parties and their members of Congress. He didn't. I should have said he directed his client Indian tribes to make campaign contributions to members of Congress from both parties. )

What's the difference? The end result is the same!

[Xenalyte]

My husband actually counted Republicans and Democrats to whom Abramoff's money was directed, and the ratio was two Rs for every D.

For what it's worth.

[WorkingClassFilth]

Many rodents are cannibalistic...RAT's for sure.

[Publius6961]

Is that the original title?

Some mental deficient doesn't know the difference between it's and its...

[Rocky]

So, people in both parties received donations, but it's only a Republican scandal? Wow, the liberals have never been so up-front about their bias.

[bad company]

I wrote that he gave campaign money to both parties and their members of Congress. He didn't.

No democrat will get past that sentence.