Posted on 01/20/2006 6:17:11 PM PST by Dubya
When I said "Everyone should be given food and water," I wasn't expressing a political opinion, i.e., that we should all go on welfare! I meant that even if a person is sick or helpless, we should not deny them food and water.
"We" meaning the state or "we" meaning private charities?
If the state is going to be using taxpayer monies to provide food and water (and other palliative 24-hour round-the-clock care like physical therapy, basic hygiene, medicines, medical treatment, a hospital bed, etc.) shouldn't the state determine if the money couldn't be better spent on a patient who is not brain damaged or brain dead? (Assuming the patient wants to be kept alive in that condition.)
Prayers for this little girl.
Haleigh is in my prayers today.
Prayers up from TEXAS...I have been following this story...and my heart breaks for this poor girl...
Dear God, please give this precious one a second chance to have the life she deserves..
sleuth
The adoptive mother (the child's biological aunt) killed her mother(the girls grandmother) than herself after she was charged with the beatings along with her husband.
The biological mother lost custody when her live in boyfriend sexually molested the little girl.
The aunt/adoptive mother, along with her husband would beat her and then blame the bruises and injuries on Hayleh saying the she was self injuring herself because of the sexual molestation.
Sick.
Lord, heal her.
Ah. So when the State pulled her breathing tube, that was OK with you since the State represented the peoples will. You were in favor of that.
A big AMEN! to your prayer for Haleigh.
If God wants her to live, she lives.
Robert, I'm all for small government and limited spending, but if we as a nation or a people think we can't afford to give some helplessly disabled person food and water (and yes, a modest bed somewhere and a little care if they have no means), then our poverty is not in our pocketbook but in our soul.
Give to some or to all?
If you are willing to turn the care over to the state, then don't be surprised when the state makes the life and death decisions for those under their care. That's the point of the article.
You seemed to be making the argument that we should starve/dehydrate people who couldn't pay up. That's all I was responding to. Was my conclusion wrong? I hope so.
Regards
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.