HAHA! This would be funny!
Since when is an accurate report of the truth of what government-employed teachers do in the classroom "spying"?
T R A N S P A R E N C Y
T R A N S P A R E N C Y
It's not spying....it's whistleblowing :o).
Great way for my son to help pay his college tuition....
I hope they don't get nabbed with cheating. All the professor has to say is that was going to be part of the test. This truly does not seem very smart especially if they are sneaking around. I would think twice about it. Good thought, but could backfire.
Darn right it's a witch hunt. Rats on brooms beware.
The libs need some cheese with that whine.
I put up with 4 years of attempted indoctrination while I was in law school.....hehehehe.....didn't work!
Just the thought of being monitored will have a useful effect. Those professors who are the least moonbatty will think twice, and rein it in to some degree. The more hardbitten cases will ramp it up to such a paranoid level that they'll appear to have gone completely nuts. Either way, it's effective.
Meanwhile, I'm sure, divulging state secrets is, you know, "whistleblowing."
This is no more "spying" than a reporter is "spying" on City Counsel members when he reports what happened at the meeting last night.
Excellent strategy! It will have the added benefit of increasing their paranoia and insane rantings.
Spying implies covert activity. Reporting what is being said by a state employee in a public setting is not spying. That should fall under "the public's right to know", a mantra of the NYT every time they publish REAL national security secrets. It's that well-worn double standard again...