Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rush Limbaugh confused on Supreme Court balance. Still will be 5-4, same as before. Not 6-3.

Posted on 01/16/2006 5:03:13 PM PST by motife

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-150 last
To: Rennes Templar

To the contrary, I listen to him, or his sit-in substitute, every day as background in my office. I enjoy a perverse analog to the pleasure/pain principle of Freud as the self-promoted "Maja Rushie" goes about doing violence to epistemology and factual accuracy.


141 posted on 01/22/2006 7:25:05 AM PST by middie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: kylaka
The Left's take is that he doesn't want to embarass himself

Anyone who has heard Justice Thomas speak, or read some of his opinions, knows that embarrassing himself is the last thing he would worry about. On a par with Scalia, Thomas is the most lucid thinker on the court. He doesn't ask questions because he understands the arguments implicitly and has no interest in what the advocates think about implications of a decision for which he, not they, will be responsible.

142 posted on 01/22/2006 7:35:43 AM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: latina4dubya
how is it that Souter was chosen?

He was recommended by a local, Rudman or Sununu I forget which, to GHWB, who didn't care about conservative values. Bush I was a RINO, basically.

Souter was a wierd recluse who more or less lived in the attic, and nobody knew how he would vote on anything...but they couldn't find a hook to hang him on, so they let him go. So we got a mental case on the Supreme Court, and the rest, as they say, is history.

143 posted on 01/22/2006 7:43:25 AM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: wyattearp

Roe was reaffirmed in Casey, a 5-4 squeaker.


144 posted on 01/22/2006 7:43:44 AM PST by JCEccles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Soul Seeker
I do NOT believe 41 wanted a Liberal on the Court. However, neither was 41 a conservative

After eight years as Ronald Reagan's VP, 41 ran on the slogan of wanting to make America a "kinder, gentler nation." He was a RINO pure and simple, a creature of the beltway hothouse.

145 posted on 01/22/2006 7:51:30 AM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: T'wit

Yes, he said it.


146 posted on 01/22/2006 7:53:40 AM PST by Paulus Invictus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: LibertarianInExile
Kennedy is NOT a conservative. Not even close.

On balance, he tends to lean left on social issues, with one bright and shining exception: partial birth abortion. He penned a stinging denunciation of partial birth abortion in dissenting from the Breyer-authored majority opinion in Stenberg v. Carhart, which basically guaranteed that the grisly practice could be practiced with impunity in all 50 states.

147 posted on 01/22/2006 7:59:04 AM PST by JCEccles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: Paulus Invictus

Thank you.


148 posted on 01/22/2006 8:07:26 AM PST by T'wit (People who strip naked and do something bizarre, as a group, in front of cameras, are liberals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard

He was not a RINO.

The Bush's a born and bred Republicans.

Committed to the Republican Party.

One day I'm going to make this a tagline, though more concise, since people keep misuing the title.

RINO= REPUBLICAN IN NAME ONLY

Bush 41 was not Chafee. He was not Bloomberg. He was not loyal to the PARTY in name only. RINO does not mean CONSERVATIVE In name only. The two are separate.

Rudy, Bush 41 or 43, Reagan, Pence, Romney, Allen..whatever their ideological leanings are NOT Republicans, devoted to Party, in name only.

Now was Bush 41 possibly a CINO? Conservative In Name Only? I'd say yes. He was a Northeast Republican that played conservative when it suited him in order to advance through the standings in the Party. In order to win his first election on Reagan's coattails. He'd vacilate on abortion and other matters dependant on how he perceived circumstances of the day. He wasn't a full fledged Liberal....but he was by no means a conservative. But he WAS, and IS, a Republican by birth. Just as my grandparents were Democrats by birth. They were raised so, bled FDR colors, as many from that generation did.


149 posted on 01/23/2006 10:22:29 AM PST by Soul Seeker (Mr. President: It is now time to turn over the money changers' tables.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: motife
Perhaps he was referring to CFR.

Justice Kennedy was against CFR. We now have five solid votes against CFR.

McC will be more of a crankypants than ever if this is overturned.

150 posted on 01/31/2006 9:59:29 AM PST by OldFriend (The Dems enABLEd DANGER and 3,000 Americans died.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-150 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson