Skip to comments.
Chuck's Chance (Dem drug flash-back alert)
New York Magazine ^
| 1/15/06
| Heilemann
Posted on 01/16/2006 7:35:27 AM PST by pabianice
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-25 last
To: ken5050
Another thing the hearings emphasized is the AGE of the Dem leadership. Leahy and Kennedy are ancient (not that Spector is a kid either) and Schumer and Feinstein are not far behind. Where is the up-and-coming leadership of the Dem Party, even among the Senate staffers? Answer: it doesn't exist!
21
posted on
01/16/2006 8:41:31 AM PST
by
Rummyfan
To: pabianice
22
posted on
01/16/2006 8:52:14 AM PST
by
Chode
(American Hedonist ©®)
To: Rummyfan
Another thing the hearings emphasized is the AGE of the Dem leadership. Leahy and Kennedy are ancient (not that Spector is a kid either) and Schumer and Feinstein are not far behind. Actually, Feinstein (born 1933) is older than Leahy (born 1940). And Leahy, at 65, isn't really "ancient" by Senate standards.
23
posted on
01/16/2006 11:53:10 AM PST
by
HateBill
(Democratic Message: "Kiss Terrorist A*s" vs. Republican Message: "Kick Terrorist A*s")
To: Rummyfan
Leahy and Kennedy ----These two should not be mentioned without-->.Loose Lips/Swimmer <<being attached each time ....
24
posted on
01/16/2006 11:59:44 AM PST
by
litehaus
To: HateBill
Leahy only sixty-five? He's been in the Senate so long I thought he was in his eighties!
25
posted on
01/16/2006 2:16:35 PM PST
by
Rummyfan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-25 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
