HILLARY CLINTON KNEW ABOUT THE RAPE: HEAR JUANITA BROADDRICK

FoxNews | 01.13.06 | Mia T

[Mia T]

During the impeachment trial, Sen. Dale Bumpers (D, AR) proferred the Democrat argument for not removing the rapist from office: "He has less than two years left. What harm can he do?"

WAR AND TREASON AND THE NEW YORK TIMES

by Mia T, December 29, 2005

 

 

 

inch Sulzberger scurried to the C-SPAN confessional even as the fires raged under the mammoth heap of ash and twisted steel that was once the Twin Towers and 2801 human beings. He had to make certain no one would blame The New York Times.

The Times' 1996 endorsement of bill clinton¹ was the problem. The endorsement, you may recall, was contingent on clinton getting a brain transplant--specifically of the character lobe.² How could The Times square that shameful, irresponsible endorsement with this monstrous failure³?

Sulzberger quickly explained that The Times was able to endorse clinton by separating clinton's "policies" from "the man."⁴ (Did he actually buy into the clintons' 'compartmentalization' con⁵? Or was this apparent credulousness simply another cynical expedient for The New York Times?)

Probing questions by the host, Brian Lamb, followed, eliciting this damning historical parallel from Sulzberger: "The Times dropped ball during Holocaust by failing to connect the dots."

It appears that The New York Times doesn't learn from its mistakes.⁶ Will it take The Times another 50 years to understand/admit that by having endorsed for reelection a "documentably dysfunctional" president⁷ with "delusions" -- its own words -- it must bear sizeable blame for the 9/11 horror and its aftermath⁸? 

Sulzberger's carefully worded rationalization of the clinton endorsements points to clinton "policies," not achievements; is this tacit acknowledgement that clinton "achievements" -- when legal -- were more illusory than real -- that The Times' Faustian bargain was not such a good deal after all?

If we assume that the clintons are the proximate cause of 9/11 --- a proposition not difficult to demonstrate --- it follows that The New York Times is culpable, too.

Elie Wiesel makes a distinction between "information" and "knowledge."⁶ Information is data; it is devoid of an ethical component; it is neutral. Knowledge is a higher form of information. Knowledge is information that had been internalized and given a moral dimension.

At a minimum, The Times' failure -- whether concerning clinton endorsements, or classified leaks or the Holocaust -- is a failure to make this distinction. More likely though, it is a failure not nearly so benign.

 

 

December 7, 1941+64

AN OPEN LETTER TO TIM ROBBINS, DAVID GEFFEN, CHRIS MATTHEWS, MAUREEN DOWD + JEANINE PIRRO

RE: a not-so-modest proposal concerning hillary clinton

Dear Concerned Americans,

Hillary Clinton's revisionist tome notwithstanding, 'living history' begets a certain symmetry. It is in that light that I make this not-so-modest proposal on this day, exactly 64 years after the attack on Pearl Harbor.

The context of our concern today--regardless of political affiliation--is Iraq and The War on Terror, but the larger fear is that our democracy may not survive.

We have the requisite machines, power and know-how to defeat the enemy in Iraq and elsewhere, but do we have the will?

In particular, do we have the will to identify and defeat the enemy in our midst?

Answerable to no one, heir apparent in her own mind, self-serving in the extreme, Hillary Clinton incarnates this insidious new threat to our survival.

What we decide to do about Missus Clinton will tell us much about what awaits us in these perilous new times.

COMPLETE LETTER

December 7, 1941+64
Mia T
AN OPEN LETTER TO TIM ROBBINS, DAVID GEFFEN, CHRIS MATTHEWS, MAUREEN DOWD + JEANINE PIRRO
RE: a not-so-modest proposal concerning hillary clinton


COPYRIGHT MIA T 2005

COMPLETE ARTICLE WITH FOOTNOTES

[Mia T]

fyi

[Mia T]

fyi

[fullchroma]

Leftist thought naturally attracts the emotional non-ratiocinator.

Early on I thought libs were simply not intelligent, incapable of broader thought. Actually, I still think so but there does seem to be a deeper difference between liberal and conservative problem-solving that goes beyond ethics and education, I don't think it's simply the desire to do whatever it takes to gain power although that genesis would be less of a danger to the country than an actual, irrational conviction in liberal dogma.

At heart, liberals believe in short-term, feel-good, unconstitutional, socialist solutions to societal woes. They are arrogant utopians and Utopia itself is illogical and unnatural. Furthermore, who defines this utopia? Hillary?

Now I've fatigued and bored myself. But I think an in-depth psychological analysis of the differences between libs and conservatives would be interesting. Might even produce a cure for Clinton supporters.

[Mia T]

 

ON THE FICTIONALIZED MEMOIR--hear hillary!
THE (oops!) INADVERTENT ADMISSIONS OF HILLARY AND JANE IN SAN FRANCISCO _{~PART TWO~}

 

by Mia T, 2.10.06

also see:
THE (oops!) INADVERTENT ADMISSIONS OF BILL + HILLARY CLINTON _{--PART ONE--}

COPYRIGHT MIA T 2006

[Mia T]

Interesting take.
bump. :)

[Burlem]

It seems very few folks discuss the matter, same with the Barrett report, even the republicans, according to newsmax would rather target their own...amazing.

http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2006/2/10/122950.shtml?s=ic

[Cincinna]

Pellicano is now up on Federal charges. Will his stint working for Slick and his WINO be a factor?
Exactly what sort of work did this private eye do for the Arkansas Grifters? Shouldn't it be made public?

[Burlem]

I just heard KSFO Morning show.
Kieran Lalor was a guest he is a former serviceman serving in Iraq. He and other military members are on a "Anti clinton crusade.
http://www.eternalvigilancesociety.org

[Mia T]

bump.

[Mia T]

HILLARY CLINTON THREATENED JUANITA BROADDRICK
2 WEEKS AFTER BILL CLINTON RAPED HER (VIDEO)

[Mia T]

Exactly. We must field exceptional people of character, intelligence and achievement. Enough of the professional pol, a self-selected subgroup that is mediocre, dysfunctional, self-absorbed, corrupt or corruptible.... The Founders had the right idea: The citizen-politician.

[Leftism is Mentally Deranged]

Remember this when the hil runs for president.

[Mia T]

bump

[Mia T]

Remember this, too.

[Mia T]

And this.

[Nancee]

"They have 'behaved as though they are justified in using any tactic in pursuit of their goals,' including illegality, deception, libel, threats and 'ruining the lives of perceived enemies . . . ' They believe, she continues, 'they are justified in using any means to achieve their ends for a simple and uncomplicated reason. It is that they are superior individuals whose gifts and backgrounds entitle them to leadership.' They do it for themselves; for the continuance of Them."

This is the essence of them!!!

Nancee

[Mia T]

"They have 'behaved as though they are justified in using any tactic in pursuit of their goals,' including illegality, deception, libel, threats and 'ruining the lives of perceived enemies . . . '

They believe, she continues, 'they are justified in using any means to achieve their ends for a simple and uncomplicated reason. It is that they are superior individuals whose gifts and backgrounds entitle them to leadership.' They do it for themselves; for the continuance of Them."

Both true and ironic. It is precisely their inferiority and deficiencies that drive them.

Do you have the source of that quote?

[Nancee]

"Do you have the source of that quote?

No, not off hand, but I'll go back up through your material and find it! Back soon!

:-)

[Mia T]

ping