Posted on 01/13/2006 4:35:43 PM PST by FairOpinion
Let's see. RINOs want to re-elect Ahhhhhhhnold. RINOs cannot do this without getting the actual conservatives and actual Republicans to vote for the airhead. Brilliant RINO strategy. Do not have the Musclehead govern like a Republican. Instead, insult the Republicans and conservatives. That will make them vote for Ahhhhhhnold!!!!!! Gosh, what brilliance!
The only things you will find in "the middle of the road" are yellow stripes and dead skunks.
In answer to your diversionary question back in post #149, I would never EVER vote dem in CA, or allow my vote to benefit a dem.
Anyone who advocates voting dem on this forum is a fraud.
If I haven't asked you yet, do you support abortion being legal? If so, why??? If not, why not??? Provide evidence of your activism.
What is it with you illinii, suffering from extreme state envy?
Translation: Baby-killing, queer-coddling, gun-grabbing spendaholics in love with public skewels and their brainwashing of innocent kids at maximum taxpayer expense, all in faux GOP drag.
Save this post too!
Again, do you favor legalized baby-killing in the form of abortion???? If so, why? If not, why not???? Provide proof of your activism.
You stand as exposed as Ahhhhhnold and his wife's Uncle Ted and Uncle Bob and Grandpa Joe and Uncle Bob's ten leftist kids and Patches Kennedy, the Maria cousin who misrepresents Rhode Island when not beating up on uppity security personnel at airports and... and.... and....
By the way, do you support legalized abortion? If not, why not? If so, why? Provide credible evidence of your activism.
Also, answer the abortion questions I posed to you. Wonder why you haven't answered. All too obvious actually.
The second clause of your first sentence says that you would have voted for John Lindsay over Mario Proccacino and over Bill Buckley. I hope you don't call yourself conservative.
You are a fraud.
While we are at it, what do you think of legalized abortion (50 million dead and counting)? Do you support it? If so, why? If not, why not? Provide credible evidence of your activism.
Also define "conservative."
AND: the basis of your conclusion that I am a fraud???? I can understand your reluctance to engage in combat based on actual proof. You seem to imagine that if the GOP nominates Lucifer, voting for Lucifer becomes the conservative thing to do. Especially if Lucifer supports killing babies, coddling queers, grabbing guns and CLAIMS to want to protect your assets while squandering zillions on public skewels and other schemes, ESPECIALLY if Lucifer will provide jobs and contracts and infuence to the windbag leftists and amoral social revolutionaries who pose as "fiscally conservative" Republicans. Move to Howard ARRRRRRRGH Dean's Vermont. You'll love it .
Do you support legalized abortion? If so, why? If not, why not? Provide credible proof of your activism for or against abortion.
Define "conservative."
What you call a fraud is anyone who refuses to knuckle under to the GOP ubver alles so long as abortion is legal and totally available mentality.
You need us. We don't need you or Ahhhhhnold or Buffett, etc. You can be replaced by socially conservative ethnics of modest finances in a ratio of a thousand to one. In fact, you will be.
The only abortion I would advocate is yours from this forum, fraud.
I'll take your bogus bait and give you and your ilk herd plenty of ammunition to further expose yourselves.
Abortion is the biggest tragedy to befall this country. It is a betrayal of the very first promise, the promise of life.
The communist offensives to corrupt our society were effective and most of their goals were achieved, among these, the aforementioned tragedy.
Pandora's Box was opened and this tragedy became accepted. Its absolute BS and I hate it, I hate it, I hate it!
Now comes the hard part. There is no majority to abolish this tragedy. When we speak of abolishment we scare this majority and drive them into the enemy's camp. There is a majority when this tragedy is broken into trimesters, especially the first trimester. I have made the personal decision to consider the infant during the first trimester 'a thing'. I'm not happy with my compromise but it must be done. If we can protect the infants in the second and third trimesters, I consider that a start. Education and birth control must be used to protect the infant 'things' in the first trimester. If we on the right were to accept this compromise we would make great strides in capturing the middleground.
You mailed it, ma'am ...
Go talk to your pals at DU.
See post #618.
See Post #618.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.