Skip to comments.
Why I'm skipping the Oscars this year
www.Townhall.com ^
| Jan. 13, 2006
| Ben Shapiro
Posted on 01/13/2006 7:54:16 AM PST by Millicent_Hornswaggle
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-104 next last
To: Millicent_Hornswaggle
I haven't watched the Oscars in at least 20 years because,frankly,I don't care to be bored to death.
21
posted on
01/13/2006 8:23:22 AM PST
by
Mears
(The Killer Queen:caviar and cigarettes)
To: Millicent_Hornswaggle
Have not watched since Marlon Brando brought Little Feather whats-her-name onto the dias.
To: Millicent_Hornswaggle
Soon, you may find that the statue itself will not pass the gay mafia anal exam, and will have to be rebuilt.
The Oscar is probably not Gay looking enough to reflect today's Hollywood.
23
posted on
01/13/2006 8:25:21 AM PST
by
lormand
(Close the border...the US/Kalifornia border.)
To: Millicent_Hornswaggle
Oscar? Isn't he that grouchy green guy who lives in a trash can?
24
posted on
01/13/2006 8:27:17 AM PST
by
Luna
(Lobbing the Holy Hand Grenade at Liberalism)
To: yobid
Last month for the first time in 10 years,
I entered a movie house; wanted to see
HPGOF with the Greatkids! Loved it.
But that may have been because there were
only 3 other people in the theater besides
us! 10 years ago I took their parent to
see 101 DALMATIANS, which I did NOT enjoy!
25
posted on
01/13/2006 8:27:28 AM PST
by
Grendel9
(u)
To: Millicent_Hornswaggle
What are the OSCARS?
Are they a new version of the music group, the Cars?
And, who knew that Hollyweird gave itself awards??
26
posted on
01/13/2006 8:34:58 AM PST
by
DustyMoment
(FloriDUH - proud inventors of pregnant/hanging chads and judicide!!)
To: Millicent_Hornswaggle
He is absolutely correct. It isn't about how good a picture is, it's about how good it is at progressing someone's agenda.
27
posted on
01/13/2006 8:50:05 AM PST
by
sandbar
(when)
To: Borges
"Critics don't vote for the Oscars."HA!!
Oh yes they do.
...you just keep telling yourself that.
28
posted on
01/13/2006 8:50:19 AM PST
by
Landru
(A sucker's born every minute & now we're swamped by 'em.)
To: Borges
I also think Swank (for her first award, at least), Berry and Theron all deserved their Oscars. Let's face it: leading actresses usually aren't given good roles which would permit them to stretch their ranges.
A lot of the time, Oscars are given as "compensations". Denzel Washington gave a good performance in the routine Training Day, and was rewarded seemingly in compensation for not getting it for his searing perfromances as Malcolm X and Hurricane Carter. Nicole Kidman had proved herself to be more than "Mrs. Tom Cruise" after giving superb performances in To Die For, and The Others, and an excellent one in Moulin Rouge, yet she got the award for The Hours, which was an ensemble film. I think Julianne Moore gave the best performance out of the three in that film.
29
posted on
01/13/2006 8:51:22 AM PST
by
RightWingAtheist
("Why thank you Mr.Obama, I'm proud to be a Darwinist!")
To: Millicent_Hornswaggle
"Brokeback Mountain," the stomach-churning story of two 1963 cowboys..."
One more time; THEY ARE NOT COWBOYS! THEY ARE SHEEP HERDERS!
This point may not seem important to Hollywood, but it's fighting words to cowboys...
30
posted on
01/13/2006 8:55:19 AM PST
by
Exeter
(If Life gives you lemons, just shut up and eat the damn lemons!)
To: Landru
Huh? It's an industry award. People who make movies giving the award to other people who make movies. There are no critics in the Academy hence none who vote for the Oscars.
31
posted on
01/13/2006 8:55:50 AM PST
by
Borges
To: Millicent_Hornswaggle
Unbelievably, Hanks' cheesy hospital-bed routine beat out Liam Neeson in "Schindler's List" and Daniel Day Lewis in "In the Name of the Father."I have to say that I couldn't believe Hanks beat out either of those either. I saw all 3 films and I would have put the performances of either Lewis or Neeson over Hanks.
32
posted on
01/13/2006 8:57:56 AM PST
by
StarCMC
(Old Sarge is my hero...doing it right in Iraq! Vaya con Dios, Sarge.)
To: Millicent_Hornswaggle
Oscars = Gay Superbowl.
I won't be watching, but then I never have.
33
posted on
01/13/2006 8:57:59 AM PST
by
ElTianti
To: BombHollywood
Actually they have:
34
posted on
01/13/2006 9:01:08 AM PST
by
JZelle
To: Millicent_Hornswaggle
Good time to watch the extended editions of the Lord of the Rings trilogy on the home theater instead...
35
posted on
01/13/2006 9:02:04 AM PST
by
Bean Counter
("That which does not kill us, makes us stronger.")
To: JZelle
That was a non-Hollywood indie.
36
posted on
01/13/2006 9:03:11 AM PST
by
Borges
To: Luna
Oscar? Isn't he that grouchy green guy who lives in a trash can?I much prefer this Oscar to the one in Hollywood:
37
posted on
01/13/2006 9:03:42 AM PST
by
Night Hides Not
(Closing in on 3000 posts, of which maybe 50 were worthwhile!)
To: Millicent_Hornswaggle
Quit watching the Academy Awards 20 years ago and counting.
To: Luna
Actually, I have the green furry one in the can on the mantle. It's what we call my husband, so I guess you could say that's his award!
To: ElTianti
No, the VH1 Fashion Awards are the Gay Superbowl :-)
40
posted on
01/13/2006 9:15:10 AM PST
by
RightWingAtheist
("Why thank you Mr.Obama, I'm proud to be a Darwinist!")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-104 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson