Skip to comments.
Oprah Defends Book in Surprise Call
Chicago Sun-Times ^
| January 12, 2005
| Hillel Italie
Posted on 01/12/2006 3:14:17 AM PST by BlessedBeGod
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 last
To: marktwain
One phrase that jumped out was "emotional truth". I assume that the facts need not prove the "emotional truth".
Somewhat like the phrase "that's not my reality".
41
posted on
01/12/2006 12:37:31 PM PST
by
Fred Hayek
(Liberalism is a mental disorder)
To: BlessedBeGod
Harpo'crites are better dressed than most hypocrites..
Accept it, it is a fact.. and they smile a lot too..
Oh!.. and their Compassionater's are broken and on overload...
42
posted on
01/12/2006 12:42:58 PM PST
by
hosepipe
(CAUTION: This propaganda is laced with hyperbole..)
To: Texas2step
There are many talented journalists in the print media, and some that even work for the NY Times. Even if I do not like their conclusions, or why they are looking into a story, if they lay out all of the facts they can find, and describe how the story developed it brings tonnes of credibility not only to the story, but also to the journalist. This is what the writer of TSG story did. There was no doubt in my mind that the idiot author and Oprah would not be able to punch holes in TSG's story, it was just too well documented.
As a counter example look at the Mary Mapes' forged document story. There were just too many holes on how the papers were discovered, who actually had them, and how she and Danny Boy were made aware of them. These holes leave too much room for questioning. One of the reasons why someone like Mapes cannot fill in these holes is that the story becomes too complex and she would forget aspects of the lie, and it would collapse on itself.
Now back to this discredited book, that same thing that Mapes attempted to pull off is exactly what Frey did pull off for several years. The story lacked details that he could easily get tripped up on, the witnesses were all dead (according to him), and so he could carry on the charade. I am happy to hear was figured out, now I feel bad for the woman who wasted their time and money on the book.
43
posted on
01/12/2006 12:48:31 PM PST
by
Sthitch
To: Dr. Thorne; Chieftain
What an eloquent and succinct appraisal of the whole Oprah rip off!
She is just disgusting..making a fortune out of an obscene masturbation of other's pain and guillibility!
To: somerville
The whole story about his rehab stinks...it is sooo phony and unrealistic. His parents also deserve plenty of scorn for going along with this charade...but then, they're in the money and fame too.
Saw this lame jerk on Larry king...the guy is just so dumb! and still LYING THROUGH HIS TEETH!
To: BlessedBeGod
46
posted on
01/26/2006 9:18:19 AM PST
by
YaYa123
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson