Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Perspective: Create an e-annoyance, go to jail
News.com ^ | 1/9/06 | Declan McCullagh

Posted on 01/09/2006 8:52:31 PM PST by Lathspell

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last
I don't think this has been posted. McCullagh is a carping lib, and I hate to agree with the ACLU, but this is a terrible law, IMHO. Thank you, Arlen (wouldn't you know he was behind it?).

It's illegal to annoy

A new federal law states that when you annoy someone on the Internet, you must disclose your identity. Here's the relevant language.

"Whoever...utilizes any device or software that can be used to originate telecommunications or other types of communications that are transmitted, in whole or in part, by the Internet... without disclosing his identity and with intent to annoy, abuse, threaten, or harass any person...who receives the communications...shall be fined under title 18 or imprisoned not more than two years, or both."


1 posted on 01/09/2006 8:52:32 PM PST by Lathspell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Lathspell
Perspective: Create an e-annoyance, go to jail

you're guilty! Posting a duplicate is an e-annoyance. :) (just kidding)...

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1554726/posts
2 posted on 01/09/2006 8:54:25 PM PST by jdm (WWW-WEBMASTER (My grandfather swears it's his email address))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lathspell
Duplicate posts are annoying.
3 posted on 01/09/2006 8:54:26 PM PST by martin_fierro (< |:)~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro

"Duplicate posts are annoying."

But irony is not! :)


4 posted on 01/09/2006 8:55:27 PM PST by jdm (WWW-WEBMASTER (My grandfather swears it's his email address))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Lathspell
already posted here, which is really annoying
5 posted on 01/09/2006 8:56:03 PM PST by King Prout (many accuse me of being overly literal... this would not be a problem if many were not under-precise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lathspell

Hmmm, I just posted something annoying on another forum: at least it's only two years' max!


6 posted on 01/09/2006 8:56:40 PM PST by Stevieboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lathspell

Liberals annoy me. Should we shut them down? We can start with DUh.


7 posted on 01/09/2006 8:58:05 PM PST by TBP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lathspell; GarySpFc; Cronos; A. Pole; ninenot; neutrino; oceanview; snowsislander; x5452; ...
The whole idea of tagging other bills or slipping them into a large bill so they don't get read or must be passed is nothing more then political swindling and black mail.

Not to mention this piece of crappy legislation just lets the lawyers (oh wait, that's most of our gubermint) have more reasons to sue and waste the people's monies, while making themselves rich.

Hurray for Gigantous, the government bureaucracy of no end and its legion of the billion laws....yup, surely each and every one of us in the Land of the Formerly Free, is a criminal of one stripe or another. After all, a government has no power over a free and innocent man.

8 posted on 01/09/2006 9:00:29 PM PST by jb6 (The Atheist/Pagan mind, a quandary wrapped in egoism and served with a side order of self importance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ARridgerunner

That's great.
I'll be able to post annoying comments from Canada
but no one in the US using a fictitious screen-name
(i.e. everybody)
will be allowed to annoy me in response.


9 posted on 01/09/2006 9:02:32 PM PST by Allan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jb6
After all, a government has no power over a free and innocent man.

That one statement has said it all.

10 posted on 01/09/2006 9:03:55 PM PST by Sarajevo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Lathspell

I really don't think this would stand up in court, but I could see an administration abusing this law to no end until such time that it was overturned.

Hilary? Did you vote for this so you'd have it for the future?


11 posted on 01/09/2006 9:04:21 PM PST by kingu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lathspell
To grease the rails for this idea, Sen. Arlen Specter

Wouldn't you know.

The main problem with these types of laws is that they make no attempt to define what constitutes harassment, they purposely leave them as broad as possible to allow the possibility of using them to crush anyone who deigns to vociferously disagree with the anointed ones.

12 posted on 01/09/2006 9:05:59 PM PST by jordan8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lathspell

Sounds sort of like a self-extinguishing law. If you didn't disclose your identity, how would they find you? And if they found you, it would be only because you'd disclosed your identity (inadvertently or not) so....


13 posted on 01/09/2006 9:08:47 PM PST by ArmstedFragg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lathspell

I'll probably end up in jail...LOL


14 posted on 01/09/2006 9:09:10 PM PST by yldstrk (My heros have always been cowboys-Reagan and Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Allan

Hey, my name isn't fictitious, I just haven't given my last name!

(P.S. Your mother dresses you funny!) ;p


15 posted on 01/09/2006 9:09:15 PM PST by Theresawithanh (You'll get me to stop posting on FR when you wrench my laptop from my cold, dead fingers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: jdm

Create an e-annoyance, go to jail

My whole damn life is one big e-annoyance. If it weren't for FR, I'd move to the gulf and live on my boat with nothing more high-tech than a VHF radio.


16 posted on 01/09/2006 9:09:50 PM PST by lesser_satan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lathspell

It will be tossed on First Amendment grounds. Sadly, Snarlin' Arlen will still be around pushing more bilge. Gee, I hope I didn't annoy him with this post...actually I hope I did. Let him prosecute.


17 posted on 01/09/2006 9:11:41 PM PST by peyton randolph (As long is it does me no harm, I don't care if one worships Elmer Fudd.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lathspell

The Nigerans have "insulted" many with their spam. Does this ruling affect them too?


18 posted on 01/09/2006 9:13:09 PM PST by CarrotAndStick (The articles posted by me needn't necessarily reflect my opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro; jdm; King Prout; Admin Moderator
Sorry. Don't know what I did wrong.

Admin Moderator: Please delete this duplicate posting, thanks.

19 posted on 01/09/2006 9:27:24 PM PST by Lathspell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Lathspell

public apologies are really annoying, too

(relax)


20 posted on 01/09/2006 9:29:28 PM PST by King Prout (many accuse me of being overly literal... this would not be a problem if many were not under-precise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson