Posted on 01/09/2006 6:03:20 PM PST by Tailgunner Joe
"In the last months, this behemoth bought, in a throwback to good ol Soviet times, curious assets to complete its portfolio: Izvestia, a money-losing newspaper, and NTV, a leading TV network formerly owned by one of Putins rapidly vanishing rivals"
Yeah - that's the "Free Market" at work.
BWAHAHAHA
Except once again, according to the Germans who received the gas, it was your employer the socialist Yushchi who stole the gas. But why bring that little fact up for a candidate with the Clinton spin team as his employer. Hope you're not getting paid by the percentage point, it'll be a lonely year for you.
The MSM likes to call Putin "authoritarian." Let's just call him what he is, a socialist.
Other editorials in this issue of 'the Crimson' (can't get much more of a Red paper than that) include...
COLUMNS
PUBLISHED ON Monday, January 09, 2006
Jumping The Track
Accounting 101 be darneda liberal arts education is something special
By ADAM GOLDENBERG
The increasing trend toward concentration in Economics
might at first appearances seem to indicate an increased desire on the part of college men to be well acquainted with modern affairs, opined this page in December 1929. But unfortunately many of these men are interested in Economics because they believe it to be an open sesame to a fortune.
"'the Crimson' (can't get much more of a Red paper than that)"
LOL.
Would you support the unfriendly state with subcidizing gaz? No and Russia will not. Let Ukarine pay the market price!
"The MSM likes to call Putin "authoritarian." Let's just call him what he is, a socialist."
Once a communist always a communist
"Other editorials in this issue of 'the Crimson"
Whats that have to do with Russia's despotism during this gas war.
"Would you support the unfriendly state with subcidizing gaz? No and Russia will not. Let Ukarine pay the market price!"
What about the two contract prices ? You keep talking about "market" prices while ignoring the fact that Putie reneged on two contracts Ukraine had to purchase gas at $50 until 2009.
But whats a contract to a communist.
We're talking about the college newspaper of Harvard. I do not find it a credible source.
Ukraine admitted to stealing gas from Russia (quite separatly from taking Turkmen gas from the line) before and after the contract thus rendering the contract null and void.
What about the two contract prices ? You keep talking about "market" prices while ignoring the fact that Putie reneged on two contracts Ukraine had to purchase gas at $50 until 2009. ===
Ukraine didn't have such contract or already has been in court waving it. But no such things except propaganda by mister Ekhanurov.
"Ukraine didn't have such contract or already has been in court waving it"
Checkmate!
Well which is it RusIvan? How can they be in court waing it if it never existed. You can't keep up with the tangled web you weave.
"Ukraine admitted to stealing gas from Russia (quite separatly from taking Turkmen gas from the line) before and after the contract thus rendering the contract null and void."
"Ukraine didn't have such contract or already has been in court waving it."
Boy, you ask 2 putiephiles a simple question and you get three mutually exclusive answers.
Double Checkmate
1. The contract was null and void is the same as saying there is no contract.
2. If you read what RusIvan said it's clear that if Ukraine had a contract that WASN'T null and void that they'd have been waving it in the Belgium arbitration court, instead they were afraid to go.
Since then they've made a deal which the Gas Princess Tymoshenko (who got rich stealing Russian gas) objects to. Hmm isn't in interesting that a deal that prevents Ukraine from stealing gas is objected to by the one who profited most from stealing it.
"if Ukraine had a contract that WASN'T null and void that they'd have been waving it in the Belgium arbitration court,"
What, do you think a suit in the Hague is like walking into McDonalds? First you have to get world opinion against Putie and then you crush his nuts in court.
Talking nonsense again I see.
Russia has invited them to take it to the arbitration court before. There Russia can prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that Yushchenko and Tymoshenko are theives and liars and make a mockery out of the west in general.
First you have to get world opinion against Putie and then you crush his nuts in court.==
You create your "world opinion" by what? By lies? You think it will work in court?:)
You are very spoiled person if you rely on lies to win your cause.
If you think that your cause in strong you go to court or wait when your opponent will do that.
If you think that your case is weak then you flap you tongue before media to lie and lie and lie with hopeless attempt to make your case before "world opinion".
"Russia has invited them to take it to the arbitration court before"
Reference Please
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.