Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

After OKC bombing, Secret Service took thousands of phone records without court approval...
McCurtain Daily Gazette ^ | 1/5/2006 | J.D. Cash and Lt. Col. Roger Charles U.S.M.C. (retired)

Posted on 01/05/2006 7:35:51 PM PST by Velveeta

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101 next last
No court approval Bubba? I'm shocked.
1 posted on 01/05/2006 7:35:54 PM PST by Velveeta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Velveeta

Does this mean we have to dig up ol McVeigh and exonerate him or something?


2 posted on 01/05/2006 7:38:04 PM PST by muawiyah (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Velveeta

BTTT


3 posted on 01/05/2006 7:39:17 PM PST by Jet Jaguar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Velveeta
Once again Bush did it and without ACLU approval!!!

OReilly did a number on an ACLU weinie tonight. He asked:

"So, in your mind, Bush is guilty without the need for an investigation and court process?" (paraphrase.)

4 posted on 01/05/2006 7:40:06 PM PST by Young Werther
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

"Does this mean we have to dig up ol McVeigh and exonerate him or something?"

It means several bad things but hopefully not one.


5 posted on 01/05/2006 7:40:55 PM PST by gondramB (Democracy: two wolves and a lamb voting on lunch. Liberty: a well-armed lamb contesting the vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

Yeah, that's the ticket. LOL


6 posted on 01/05/2006 7:40:57 PM PST by Velveeta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Velveeta

That's different. Clinton was a democrat, you see . . .


7 posted on 01/05/2006 7:41:19 PM PST by Hoodat ( Silly Dems)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hoodat

Well, he'll have to identify the body then.


8 posted on 01/05/2006 7:43:25 PM PST by muawiyah (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

GMTA......let's re-animate McVeigh! AFter all, his rights were violated!


9 posted on 01/05/2006 7:43:36 PM PST by OldFriend (The Dems enABLEd DANGER and 3,000 Americans died.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Velveeta
Quite a few Government agencies have the power to seize phone records and othe private info without a court order.

That is not the same thing as wiretaps tho. I for one think wiretaps of foreign terror suspects talking with Americans should not even be questioned. Of course we should be doing it.

10 posted on 01/05/2006 7:44:28 PM PST by yarddog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Velveeta; All

Well well well well.. Look what we got here...


11 posted on 01/05/2006 7:44:37 PM PST by KevinDavis (http://www.cafepress.com/spacefuture)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

serious question - does this kind of information require a warrant? these aren't taps of phone conversations, just a list of the numbers called apparently.


12 posted on 01/05/2006 7:45:04 PM PST by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Velveeta
The documents, legally obtained by this newspaper, reveal the transfer of thousands of individual telephone records into a special database the Secret Service created during the first frantic days after the April 19, 1995, Oklahoma City bombing.

That's impossible!!! George Bush was not yet President on April 19, 1995.

13 posted on 01/05/2006 7:45:47 PM PST by WideGlide (That light at the end of the tunnel might be a muzzle flash.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Velveeta

They gathered all this info and have still refused to admit what Jayna Davis and many of us know --- the Iraqi connection to OKC.


14 posted on 01/05/2006 7:46:45 PM PST by doug from upland (NEW YORK TIMES -- traitorous b*st*rds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Velveeta
I didn't think that your phone records (calling pattern) is confidential. These are items that are readily available in discovery.
15 posted on 01/05/2006 7:47:17 PM PST by Mike Darancette (Mesocons for Rice '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WideGlide

>That's impossible!!! George Bush was not yet President on April 19, 1995<

Doesn't matter. It's still Bush's fault.


16 posted on 01/05/2006 7:47:51 PM PST by Hoodat ( Silly Dems)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: oceanview
Look, we'd get strange phone numbers on our bills and I'd call the party on the other end and find out who they were and who it was hacked our numbers to call them.

Send that sucker over to the cops and make a collection.

Theoretically the cops would need a warrant to make that call to whoever it was at the other end. Remember, they'd "done nothing".

I didn't need a warrant.

No one ever questioned this method, least of all the phone company.

It's like this, phones are not new. Phone scams have been around a long time. If you're getting billed for someone else's "use" you are allowed to pursue them!

17 posted on 01/05/2006 7:48:42 PM PST by muawiyah (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: yarddog
Quite a few Government agencies have the power to seize phone records and othe private info without a court order.

But here, the names, payment history, etc of every single debit card customer was logged into the government database.

I for one think wiretaps of foreign terror suspects talking with Americans should not even be questioned.

I agree, completely.

18 posted on 01/05/2006 7:49:27 PM PST by Velveeta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

Any odds that this will be reported by the MSM ?


19 posted on 01/05/2006 7:50:05 PM PST by Westlander (Unleash the Neutron Bomb)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

What will Nancy Pelosi say?


20 posted on 01/05/2006 7:50:09 PM PST by Velveeta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson