Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New Device Will Sense Through Concrete Walls
American Forces Press Service ^ | Jan 3, 2005 | Donna Miles

Posted on 01/03/2006 4:23:08 PM PST by SandRat

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-114 next last
To: SandRat
The new "Radar Scope" will give warfighters searching a building the ability to tell within seconds if someone is in the next room

I've seen one of these somewhere else:


81 posted on 01/04/2006 9:44:52 PM PST by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussiebabe

And count one staunch conservative.

You may be thinking of the war on terror but I am concerned with unrelated applications.


82 posted on 01/04/2006 9:46:42 PM PST by School of Rational Thought (Republican - The thinking people's party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Old Professer
Nice catch Professor.

Cheers,

knewshound
83 posted on 01/04/2006 9:47:02 PM PST by knews_hound (Now with two handed typing !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: knews_hound; nicolezmomma; gaijin

welcome aboard!


84 posted on 01/04/2006 9:49:11 PM PST by AntiGuv (™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Richard-SIA

Exactly.

Except if we're scared. Then anything is reasonable.

/gagging sarcasm


85 posted on 01/05/2006 3:02:37 AM PST by Badray (In the hands of bureaucrat, a clip board can be as dangerous to liberty as a gun.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: porkchops 4 mahound

I'm not sure which is worse, your apparent lack of knowledge regarding the Constitution or the seeming lack of a backbone that you portrayed in that post.

Here's a hint. . .

We don't get our rights from the Constitution. Or from the government.

Here's another. . .

Rights do not have to be named to exist.

Clue #3. . .

If we have no right to privacy, why would it even be necessary to remind the government that it "...SHALL NOT BE VIOLATED"?


86 posted on 01/05/2006 3:12:03 AM PST by Badray (In the hands of bureaucrat, a clip board can be as dangerous to liberty as a gun.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Richard-SIA
But who gets it first, our troops overseas, or the local cops looking to see what you may own?

The only thing they could see that you own is something in motion. It detects bodies because of motion – breathing. It does not give a picture of the interior.
87 posted on 01/05/2006 3:35:08 AM PST by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: mysterio

What does an honest person have to fear? I wish they had gotten a warrant for Moussaui.


88 posted on 01/05/2006 7:03:59 AM PST by GOPPachyderm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Gucho

There's a picture of one over here...

http://kotp.blogspot.com/2006/01/pentagon-20-eyes-like-supermans.html


89 posted on 01/05/2006 7:15:04 AM PST by OXENinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: GOPPachyderm

If an honest person has nothing to fear, then why did the founding fathers prohibit warrantless searches? And if you want warrantless searches, then why can't you just repeal the Fourth Amendment and be honest about it rather than trying to sidestep it?


90 posted on 01/05/2006 8:52:19 AM PST by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: ATOMIC_PUNK

Nope. How do you think I got a lot of the stuff I use? I follow the Milton Berle theory; "I'll steal no joke line or image until it's time."


91 posted on 01/05/2006 10:22:05 AM PST by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: OXENinFLA
There's a picture of one over here...


Thank you.
92 posted on 01/05/2006 2:02:24 PM PST by Gucho
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

93 posted on 01/05/2006 2:11:13 PM PST by NYTexan (Where is MY Global Warming???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mysterio
Something that always bothers me about people complaining about government searches: The 4th Amendment covers only "unreasonable searches and seizures" not "warrantless" searches. Even then many exceptions have been carved out.

In my opinion (and I think that of most reasonable people) a judge is capable of determining if a search was reasonable either subsequent to or prior to a search. In effect your rights are still protected to the same extent.

Of course you need an honest judge. The older I get the more I realize those are few and far between.

94 posted on 01/05/2006 2:13:20 PM PST by Comstock1 (I came here to kick ass and chew bubble gum, and I'm all outta bubble gum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: GOPPachyderm
What does an honest person have to fear?

For starters, the motive behind anyone who advances a sophistic argument such as that.

95 posted on 01/05/2006 2:33:40 PM PST by Freebird Forever (If they're truly public servants, why do they live in the mansions?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Freebird Forever; mysterio

You have nothing to worry about from me - my motives are to ensure that people don't have to choose between being burned to death or leaping out a window to a certain death. If Americans have business with Osama and his friends, I hope there are people listening in.

Due to the number of warrants that have been denied the Bush administration and the various leaks to the media, I would prefer that warrantless searches be made rather than no searches at all.





96 posted on 01/05/2006 4:06:25 PM PST by GOPPachyderm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: SandRat
Image hosted by TinyPic.com

Sometimes i make my own like this one but my better ones are hand drawn but with the lack of a scanner it's hard to get'em to the net !

97 posted on 01/05/2006 4:26:08 PM PST by ATOMIC_PUNK (secus acutulus exspiro ab Acheron bipes actio absol ab Acheron supplico)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

Can it work to see IED's buried in the ground?


98 posted on 01/05/2006 4:27:28 PM PST by airborne (If being a Christian was a crime, would there be enough evidence to convict you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TommyDale
Oh, the RATS will have a problem with this one.

They shouldn't worry: the technology described can only see through concrete; it hasn't a prayer of penetrating a Liberal's skull.

99 posted on 01/05/2006 4:28:42 PM PST by andy58-in-nh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: porkchops 4 mahound

The populist view of rights is that they must be enumerated to exist. That is incorrect.

The Federalists argued, correctly, that an enumeration such as the Bill of Rights (BOR) would lead to the erroneous conclusion that those rights not enumerated were not reposed in the people. Please see Federalist No. 84, here: http://patriotpost.us/fedpapers/fed_84.html

The Anti-Federalists however, refused to ratify the Constitution without a specific enumeration of rights. Ultimately the Federalists acquiesced, and in exchange for Anti-Federalist support and ratification of the Constitution, agreed to include a BOR at their first opportunity.

The proposed BOR can be found here: http://patriotpost.us/histdocs/madamend.htm

The people never surrendered or delegated their right of privacy, or control thereof to the government. In teh case of Griswold v. Connecticut, it was therefore entirely unnecessary for the Supremes to examine the emanations of the prenumbras of the BOR to "FIND" a right of privacy or make one up....we never surrendered it in the first place.

The Fourth Amendment is likewise superfluous to a free people, where the only authorized government action, or delegated authority, is specifically enumerated in the body of the Constitution. Absent a specific grant of authority to search, there is no authority to search.



100 posted on 01/05/2006 10:37:32 PM PST by Conservative Goddess (Politiae legibus, non leges politiis, adaptandae)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-114 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson