Skip to comments.
NY Times 'Stonewalling' on NSA Leak (Why am I not surprised?)
NewsMax ^
| January 2, 2006
| Carl Limbacher
Posted on 01/02/2006 12:27:47 PM PST by Kaslin
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-85 next last
To: Kaslin
What is ironic is that they will not provide reasons for their decision to publish, while attacking/subverting their own government for its decision to not provide an explanation for its intelligence gathering.
The difference is that the government (we hope and trust) has our national security interests to consider before blabbing, whereas the hacks at NYT only are covering their butts and their left-leaning friends in DC.
The NYT AND the leaker(s) are traitors, aren't they?
41
posted on
01/02/2006 1:45:17 PM PST
by
jbp1
To: Dr. Bogus Pachysandra
No problem.
Where do I send the bill? :-}
42
posted on
01/02/2006 1:46:13 PM PST
by
jwalsh07
To: IonInsights
Respectfully, I'm old enough to remember when Watergate was a "third-rate burglary" of little or no concern or consequence to anyone but George McGovern.
The Slimes and the Dems worked overtime to change all that.
Incidentally, ask any middle-schooler about Watergate and they'll tell you it was Nixon the Crook ordering a burglary (he didn't).
Revising history is so easy when you control the media and the schools.
43
posted on
01/02/2006 1:54:53 PM PST
by
daler
To: Dr. Bogus Pachysandra
If you don't wanna get mad, don't go here!Nothing to get mad about over there--just juvenile logic. Pathetic more than anything else.
44
posted on
01/02/2006 2:14:38 PM PST
by
randog
(What the....?!)
To: daler
I say, "Bring it on!". If the left wants Nixon Redux then let's do it. There's a marked difference between spying on your political enemies and spying on the nation's confessed enemies who have repeatedly attacked us, once with great effect on our own soil.
The entire nation is behind the President on this because it's so simple a child can understand it. The left is so blinded by their hatred that all they see is a chance to "Get Bush". I think this is going to hurt them, and hurt them badly, if they continue to push it. The NYT is already in bunker mode--they know they went too far, like a petulant teenager that finally pushes too hard.
45
posted on
01/02/2006 2:23:27 PM PST
by
randog
(What the....?!)
To: jimboster
Calame was pissed the Times didn't do more to politically damage Bush. Yes that is true. His cause for alarm was certainly not rooted in the issues that we conservatives are concerned about!
And Calame also complained that perhaps the NYT was afraid that it was soon to be scooped by the guy with his upcoming (Jan release) "tell-all" book.
46
posted on
01/02/2006 2:24:22 PM PST
by
ThirstyMan
(hysteria: the elixir of the Left that trumps all reason)
To: saveliberty
47
posted on
01/02/2006 2:29:41 PM PST
by
Kaslin
(The terrorists must be allowed to attack us again.... Sincerly A leftwinger)
To: Bloody Sam Roberts
A coincidence? Very doubtful. They knew exactly what they were doing
48
posted on
01/02/2006 2:31:49 PM PST
by
Kaslin
(The terrorists must be allowed to attack us again.... Sincerly A leftwinger)
To: devolve
I am absolutely livid about this sort of activity. It assists no one but the enemy, period.
I want them hung, shot, guillotined, burned at the stake, drawn and quartered, impaled, wrapped in wet cow leather and left in the desert on top of an ant bed. Not necessarily in that order.
In their reckless pursuit to trash and bring down one man, they are endangering my family, my friends, my neighbors, and heightened the length and lethality of the missions of all our troops around the world.
They constantly seek to incite punishment and even death upon the very people who work hard to oppose and stop those who mean us harm.
It's high time that crowd received a just and binding punishment of their own, just for them.
49
posted on
01/02/2006 2:34:18 PM PST
by
lapsus calami
(What's that stink? Code Pink ! !)
To: Dr. Bogus Pachysandra; All
My prediction is the left will end up with eggs in their faces. Life is sweet
50
posted on
01/02/2006 2:37:52 PM PST
by
Kaslin
(The terrorists must be allowed to attack us again.... Sincerly A leftwinger)
To: conservative physics
which it had.Looks to me like they are still there.
51
posted on
01/02/2006 2:39:14 PM PST
by
bayliving
(Dems used to be funny. Now they're just dangerous.)
To: Kaslin
52
posted on
01/02/2006 2:44:00 PM PST
by
doug from upland
(NEW YORK TIMES -- traitorous b*st*rds)
To: quefstar
what !?! it is freaking so illegal to be a communist spy, actively seeking the overthrow of the US government, it's called treason.
To: Kaslin
54
posted on
01/02/2006 4:24:49 PM PST
by
Mia T
To: Mia T
How dare President Bush protect the country from another 9/11 or even worse. We can't have that. The terrorists must be allowed to attack this country again
< /sarcasm>
55
posted on
01/02/2006 4:35:34 PM PST
by
Kaslin
(The terrorists must be allowed to attack us again.... Sincerly A leftwinger)
To: Kaslin
It's incredible how the left cannot understand the political or psychological dynamic.
56
posted on
01/02/2006 4:40:26 PM PST
by
Mia T
To: cmsgop
The Republicans had better develop some cajones, or the libs will make this another Watergate.Also a good test for the AG and the FBI director. Let's see how serious THEY are.
57
posted on
01/02/2006 4:50:39 PM PST
by
lawnguy
(Give me some of your tots!!!)
To: bayliving; claudiustg; oldbrowser; Paladin2; Dr. Bogus Pachysandra; Chode
I see this differently.
For me, however, the most obvious question is still this: If no one at The Times was aware of the eavesdropping prior to the election, why wouldn't the paper have been eager to make that clear to readers in the original explanation and avoid that politically charged issue? The paper's silence leaves me with uncomfortable doubts. Now it looks like this editor is going to try to pretend to anyone who is stupid enough to read this (me) that the NYT was perhaps trying to help G.W. before the election by not printing this story.
These people are so Effin bizarrely foolish! What a plan!!
LOL
58
posted on
01/02/2006 4:56:13 PM PST
by
beyond the sea
("If someone is calling you from Al Queda, we want to know why.")
To: Mia T
Well I've come to the decision. If the lunatics on the left want the terrorists to come in and kill them it's their privilege. I however refuse to let the terrorist kill me and my family. And I thank God for President Bush who wants to protect the country
59
posted on
01/02/2006 5:22:07 PM PST
by
Kaslin
(The terrorists must be allowed to attack us again.... Sincerly A leftwinger)
To: doug from upland
Thank you for the links, they will come in very handy in my fight against the lunatics in Boston Tea Party chat
60
posted on
01/02/2006 5:26:41 PM PST
by
Kaslin
(The terrorists must be allowed to attack us again.... Sincerly A leftwinger)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-85 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson