Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Middle Class Job Losses Batter Economy
Associated Press | January 2 2006 | Associated Press and Vicki Smith

Posted on 01/02/2006 4:19:44 AM PST by ventana

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 681-700701-720721-740 ... 781-797 next last
To: durasell

How about this perspective. Assuming the government continues to cut programs, entitlements, etc. a certain percentage of folks will re-evaluate their relationship with their country. Where, they will ask themselves, does loyalty reside: with the multi-national firm that puts food on the table or the country that offers no assurances?


701 posted on 01/04/2006 7:15:50 PM PST by durasell (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 696 | View Replies]

To: Andrewksu
Capitalism is gaining ground in China

Especially since the head of the Chinese communist party has decided that the only way for the party to survive is to invite the 'capitalists' in.

In order to gain access the capitalists must follow the "three representations" idea. The chinese communists are not going to let capitalism destroy them instead they are going to use it to keep themselve in power and wage war against the West. It is naive to think they would do anything else.
702 posted on 01/04/2006 7:35:53 PM PST by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 700 | View Replies]

To: muir_redwoods
We're on the 628th post in this string, I don't think getting out of here quickly is my objective. I simply have identified you as a person with statist tendencies who looks for his government to protect him from truly fair and, especially, open competition.

You can mis-identify me or others any way you choose, as it is apparently your inclination to proceed and make decisions on the basis of false data and your own pre-conceived notions. You seem to be particularly adept at constructing straw persons, and then knocking them down. Bully for you.

You've taken the amoral stand that money and greed justifies all actions, however remote, without any regulation whatsoever. I don't think you have a clue as to the implications of your economic philosophy, but maybe you should consider Albert Speer. It would seem you and he have a lot in common on the pure economic level. I challenge you to distinguish yourself from him among anything you've stated up to this point.

I am not afraid of such competition.

Oh well bully for you.

I am worthy of freedom.

And bully for you again. (Sheesh.)

I accept the risks.

Bully, bully, bully for you, you, YOU! I think we can get the picture. Allow me to summarize: independent and supremely in command of your awesome powers and recognition of your own vast accomplishments, you really should congratulate yourself. No problems with your self-confidence or ego, I think we can all agree (smile).

I don't think I am talking to someone like that and, frankly, I try to limit my contact with such people. Rail away if you like but it's not my job to educate you.

Yeah right. Don't let me or anyone else stop you from running away from your own defeats (smile).

703 posted on 01/04/2006 8:06:34 PM PST by SteveH (First they ignore you. Then they laugh at you. Then they fight you. Then you win.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 629 | View Replies]

To: Havoc
After reading everything that you had to say on this topic, I have determined that you were never cutout to be an "employee".

No, your real calling in life was to be a business mogul. I highly recommend that you start your own IT company. I further recommend that you stick to your principle's and limit all your employee hires to American citizen's. You will hire only American's, and you will pay only what your new hires expect to earn, regardless of what they are worth. Give them a true "middle class" "living wage". Don't be excessive with the benefits and retirement plan, but don't be greedy in that respect either.

You will become the new model for business in America. If you are right -- banks, venture capitalists, and all manner of eager investor's will beat a path to your door fighting with each other for the chance to bury you in operating cash.

Any further time spent on FR outlining your brilliant business sense, and novel economic ideas, will only provide an opportunity for some other Freeper to steal your plan.

Don't waste another minute here, get that company started and become the beacon for all future American business.

P.S. Stop by when your new IT company is ready for it's IPO and let us know the how we can buy into your new business model. We will eagerly await your return, and you will have a chance to "show up" all the other Freeper's who may have thought you didn't know what the heck you were ranting about. Yes, you will finally have the upper-hand after your new company rockets to to the top of the markets.

/s

704 posted on 01/04/2006 8:13:17 PM PST by been_lurking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 675 | View Replies]

To: A. Pole
Action not informed by the well thought ideas is not very efficient and often is destructive.

Agreed.

Where would be the Western civilization without thinking and debates?

And you should debate the general issues here or anywhere else for that matter. I'm not advocating any different for anyone else. For my personal, individual circumstances, with my limited time I prefer to work on a one-on-one basis, informed by the thinking and debates I've already had with my friends. This is simply how I choose to spend my time, and choose my battles against leftist ideology. You want to debate the general issues instead, and I respect that and encourage the open discussion. I believe there is ample room and need for both actions amongst conservatives. Conservatives are still vastly outnumbered in the world, there's plenty of work left to accomplish.

705 posted on 01/04/2006 8:22:51 PM PST by tyen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 692 | View Replies]

To: durasell
Where, they will ask themselves, does loyalty reside: with the multi-national firm that puts food on the table or the country that offers no assurances?

"Loyalty"? You expect that people will be loyal to such multi-national firms? What about getting the maximum gain from them in exchange for as little as possible? And ruining them if it brings some personal benefit?

706 posted on 01/04/2006 8:23:53 PM PST by A. Pole (If the lettuce cutters were paid $10 more per hour, the lettuce heads would cost FIVE CENTS more!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 701 | View Replies]

To: A. Pole

People tend to be loyal to the hand that feeds them.


707 posted on 01/04/2006 8:47:30 PM PST by durasell (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 706 | View Replies]

To: Havoc
Which person in a marriage is more responsible for the marriage working?


You have to compare apples with apples.

A marriage is two people with the same intentions.

You can have a consumer that doesn't need a product, but you can't have a product that doesn't need a consumer.
708 posted on 01/05/2006 5:11:33 AM PST by commonerX (n)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 675 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Bird
If companies are going to go offshore for cheaper labor then they should be selling those products here cheaper.

""""They are! Imagine what your every day consumer products would cost if the manufacturer was paying average U.S. wages. I don't believe there are more than a handful, if any, American companies that produce televisions. Televisions!, that most American of appliances. Is that a problem? I don't think so. US capital that was poured into an increasingly commodified industry (consumer electronics) could then be used to discover new products and ideas.""""


That is bull, a company will sell its product in the US for what ever the market will bare. Regardless is the production process was made cheaper, they just get a bigger profit margin.

I don't necessarily think these companies should be forced to stay in the US, but if they want to take their companies else where then they should have to pay a heavy tariff to bring the product back in, therefore making it a wash if you take your company somewhere else. Also they should not be protected by the US government if they run into a bad situation. You made you bed now sleep in it. The US consumes a large percentage of the world goods and they wouldn't just say, oh, then we wouldn't sell our product in the US.
709 posted on 01/05/2006 5:24:13 AM PST by commonerX (n)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 687 | View Replies]

To: commonerX
I don't necessarily think these companies should be forced to stay in the US, but if they want to take their companies else where then they should have to pay a heavy tariff to bring the product back in, therefore making it a wash if you take your company somewhere else. Also they should not be protected by the US government if they run into a bad situation. You made you bed now sleep in it. The US consumes a large percentage of the world goods and they wouldn't just say, oh, then we wouldn't sell our product in the US.

This is the solution.

710 posted on 01/05/2006 5:40:08 AM PST by A. Pole (If the lettuce cutters were paid $10 more per hour, the lettuce heads would cost FIVE CENTS more!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 709 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer

They pay the government for that service in the form of taxes, both directly through corporate income taxes and property taxes, and indirectly through the income and payroll taxes of their employees. It is quite an expense they pay for that "deal".


711 posted on 01/05/2006 7:48:27 AM PST by snap54
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 695 | View Replies]

To: snap54
They pay the government for that service in the form of taxes, both directly through corporate income taxes and property taxes, and indirectly through the income and payroll taxes of their employees.

Its really simpler than that. The American people formed a covenant early on that "the whole people covenants with each citizen, and each citizen with the whole people, that all shall be governed by certain laws for the common good."

This covenant wasn't an association by which the American people became mercenaries for corporations brokered by the US government. If American corporations want to enter the covenant and be protected by the American people, then they have to do their part, and its not just paying taxes(for those few that do).
712 posted on 01/05/2006 8:20:43 AM PST by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 711 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

I would rather think they'd approve of yours. But, that sort of nonsense doesn't address the issues, does it.

Right out of the dishonest, "I don't have a leg to stand on" debate playbook. What's next, picking on my mom?


713 posted on 01/05/2006 8:29:51 AM PST by Havoc (President George and King George.. coincidence?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 676 | View Replies]

To: Havoc
What's next, picking on my mom?

Is she a math major too?

714 posted on 01/05/2006 8:33:43 AM PST by Toddsterpatriot (The Federal Reserve did not kill JFK. Greenspan was not on the grassy knoll.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 713 | View Replies]

To: snap54

People don't exist to enrich businessmen. It is a two way street. But you come from the mindset that seems to believe that people owe you a living and owe themselves an uphill climb to get you there while they retreat ever lower each year to keep you going higher. That is the mindset of the corporation today. Filling people with psychobabble and hollow promises never intended to be kept in order to greese the wheels of the machinery and keep it going - never disaffecting people with the truth.. only with burnout as they discover the truth for themselves over time. That is why "corporation" is a curse word in america. And that's why nobody who's worked for one, by and large, wants anything to do with another when they leave one. It's a scam. But, do entertain us with more of your one sided story.


715 posted on 01/05/2006 9:53:14 AM PST by Havoc (President George and King George.. coincidence?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 679 | View Replies]

To: Andrewksu

Why would I? You're asking me to aggree that your assumption is reasonable; but, you haven't established that it is. Nor have you established that Unions twist the arms of non-union companies to offshore. One truly wonders how that works, exactly. I won't agree to something you can't establish. And as I've noted, when foreign labor is cheaper than minimum wage, it's hardly the fault of unions that businesses are chosing foreign labor. It's predictable and our forefathers
understood that. They understood a great deal - seeing the ruin mega companies would inflict on the country and the like.
But, I suppose our founders are now all socialist/marxist/communist because they largely decry what you're pushing.

As for using the phrase "treason lobby", I'm sure you don't like it. I on the other hand prefer to use language apt to the task in making my points. I'm sure the dems don't like it when Coulter applies it to them; but, it makes a salient and valid point that they won't face up to any more than you will. On the other hand, sometimes you can shame people by displaying their wrongdoing for them. Some are beyond shame. I'm aware it is useless for people beyond shame. But it helps us to see who they are.. at long last.


716 posted on 01/05/2006 10:00:14 AM PST by Havoc (President George and King George.. coincidence?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 681 | View Replies]

To: BeHoldAPaleHorse

Had to cry to mommy? Whatever are you talking about.

As for your attempts at verbal abuse as an excuse for argumentation. It doesn't work on me. Invest in an IQ and defend a position or shut up for your own sake. If you intend to waste energy on defamation, epithets and the like, you'll be doing just that - wasting *your* time.


717 posted on 01/05/2006 10:03:15 AM PST by Havoc (President George and King George.. coincidence?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 686 | View Replies]

To: expat_panama

What, we're supposed to make like nice democrats and redefine language now to make you happy?


718 posted on 01/05/2006 10:07:20 AM PST by Havoc (President George and King George.. coincidence?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 691 | View Replies]

To: Havoc

Give it up. You're fighting a losing battle. These things have to be allowed to reach critical mass.


719 posted on 01/05/2006 10:08:38 AM PST by durasell (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 718 | View Replies]

To: been_lurking

Ah, yes, another non-argument. Now that the treason lobby has
put competition to work forcing everyone else to commit treason just to stay alive - now you would like someone else to do it the right way and compete with those subverting "the right way" in a manner that beats them by paying more and charging more than Chinese and indian labor. IE, you rig the game and want me to beat you in order to show that I know better than you. You can't expect that everyone is that blind and stupid. Perhaps that logic made sense to you. If it did, I'd recommend therapy or an introduction to logic. At the very least, you need to stop wasting your time with goofyness.


720 posted on 01/05/2006 10:13:14 AM PST by Havoc (President George and King George.. coincidence?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 704 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 681-700701-720721-740 ... 781-797 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson