Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

What would Jimmy Carter say?
1 posted on 12/31/2005 10:50:04 AM PST by SmithL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 next last
To: SmithL

Bombs away!


44 posted on 12/31/2005 11:38:09 AM PST by i_dont_chat (Bush lied, people dyed. Their fingers. [Stolen from Mark Steyn].)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

Don't count on turkey for anything


45 posted on 12/31/2005 11:39:20 AM PST by paul51 (11 September 2001 - Never forget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

How is it you make glass?


48 posted on 12/31/2005 12:00:49 PM PST by yoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

Somewhat resembles prior threads.


49 posted on 12/31/2005 12:03:31 PM PST by RightWhale (pas de lieu, Rhone que nous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Saddam has a long moustache.
repeat
Saddam has a long moustache.


50 posted on 12/31/2005 12:05:15 PM PST by shadowman99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

I'm sure the NYT is already working hard trying to find a leaker on the Air Staff. Days before the mission, they will publish key aspects of the Air Tasking Order on page 1. It will no doubt be complete with the target list (with impact points), ingress/egress routes, mission time windows, ordinance loads, ELINT parameters, AWACS orbits, and (yes) even the tail numbers of planes. After all, the public has a right to know!


52 posted on 12/31/2005 12:10:25 PM PST by rbg81
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL
The United States government reportedly began coordinating with NATO its plans for a possible military attack against Iran.

Shhhhhhhhh! It'll be our little secret. Nobody tell the NYTimes.

53 posted on 12/31/2005 12:11:14 PM PST by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

we better do it now


55 posted on 12/31/2005 12:31:40 PM PST by cope85
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

The New York Times will tell us when it is going to be launched, from where it is going to be launched, and the specific targets.


56 posted on 12/31/2005 12:34:50 PM PST by doug from upland (NEW YORK TIMES -- traitorous b*st*rds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL
Hold yer fire until the human shields are in place.
58 posted on 12/31/2005 12:50:14 PM PST by Lonesome in Massachussets (NYT Headline: 'Protocols of the Learned Elders of CBS: Fake But Accurate, Experts Say.')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

I believe Iran is a threat to our well being as a nation, but is China just going to let us go after their business partener? Doesn't China get 20% of their oil from Iran?


59 posted on 12/31/2005 12:51:44 PM PST by conservativehoney (I don't ask for handouts, so why should I handout to others??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL
According to the report, CIA chief Porter Gus, in his last visit to Turkey on December 12, requested Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan to provide military bases to the United States in 2006 from where they would be able to launch an assault.

We already have access to bases at least as well positioned as Turkish ones. Diego Garcia for the heavies and tankers. At least one in a 'stan. Plus there are plenty of runways in Iraq just sitting around unused. Even Kuwait, Bahrain and Saudi can't be too pleased with the notion of a nuclear armed Iran.

60 posted on 12/31/2005 12:58:35 PM PST by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

What happened to the supposed revolution that's been in the works for the last ten years ?? Did the blog award race throw them off track ??


63 posted on 12/31/2005 1:02:25 PM PST by Rumple4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

Why would we use Eqypt to launch an assault on Iran?

We only have about 15 airbases surrounding Iran right now (Iraq, Afghanistan, Kuwait and a couple of the 'stans) not to mention an aircraft carrier or two off-shore.

Pretty poorly designed fake article.


64 posted on 12/31/2005 1:17:13 PM PST by JustDoItAlways
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

Probably and the prudent thing to do.

Anyone that has ever worked in Defense (DoD) knows that they have a gazillion plans.

Now, to get a Go Order is a different deal.


65 posted on 12/31/2005 1:33:07 PM PST by Beckwith (The liberal press has picked sides ... and they have sided with the Islamofascists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL
From Spiegel's English-langauge site, and no, it didn't get Porter Goss's name wrong.
67 posted on 12/31/2005 1:55:37 PM PST by GeneD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

Targets painted, time's running out...Is anyone paying attention in Iran? Well, if the mullahs are, they'll whine about maybe cooperating if the sun comes up in the east and try for another two years of nuke development. Not going to work this time.


69 posted on 12/31/2005 2:02:58 PM PST by hershey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

Seems like they would have put up stop loss orders if this were true.


78 posted on 12/31/2005 3:21:00 PM PST by armymarinemom (My sons freed Iraqi and Afghanistan Honor Roll students.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

Continue to improve anti-ballistic missile defenses in the USA and in Israel without stopping. Then let western Europe take care of its own problem with Iran.


83 posted on 12/31/2005 4:25:56 PM PST by familyop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL
I hope the corrupt Russians and Chinese enjoy the show.

Chimpy's little black triangles will take care of this "problem." They won't see or hear a damned thing.

84 posted on 12/31/2005 5:00:42 PM PST by Reactionary (The Liberal Social Order is a Hedonistic Idiocy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson