Posted on 12/31/2005 1:32:58 AM PST by neverdem
It's becoming more obvious that the organic precursor molecules to life are created either from CME's, or from the destruction of the stars themselves when they go nova.
Fascinating.
What is CME besides Continuing Medical Education?
Thanks for the tip. Happy New Year!
This is close to or somewhat like useful information, like: someone named Chang lives in China! Thank you so much Dr Boogart!!!
Sorry.
Inquest is correct.
Since the ionized atoms are already present in the corona and on the surface of stars, they could interact chemically once they've left the star and cooled sufficiently.
I haven't seen anyone work out any details yet.
They're also present in the general solar wind. Do we know how much gets released in CME's versus in the continuous stream of solar wind?
A real interesting question, that the article really only obliquely touches on, is whether what they're looking at is really more or less what our own system would have looked like at a similar age. In other words, was the concentration of these molecules in our system at the time large enough to have registered on a spectrometer located in another star system? If the answer is yes, then it really goes to show how uncommon life in the universe likely is.
Our solar system being relatively new in the universe, it would have been seeded with organic molecules even before our sun formed. The fact that nearly every moon, comet and rock that's been observed has organic compounds on it seems to confirm this.
I suppose you could make an argument that organic compounds could've formed soon after matter precipitated out of the aftermath of the big bang. It would've required some fusion to have occurred to produce the elements. Since the origin of galaxies and their accompanying black holes is still up for grabs, I suppose there's still room for some speculation.
But we've been looking at even newer systems lately - brand new ones, in fact. Some of them, it's true, are going to be first-generation, formed directly out of primordial gas clouds. But many others are going to be second- or third-generation. Does the fact that we're just now detecting these compounds at another star mean that most stars don't have them in a large enough quantity to support life, or that this particular star in Ophiuchus has an overabundance of them for some reason? I wish the article had given some indication one way or the other.
There are new systems, but the matter that makes them up has already been seeded with material from the first generation of stars, or whatever, nearly 12 1/2 billion years ago. At least that's the current thinking until someone comes up with a reason to change it.
The reason that these compounds are being detected now is because the technology for detecting them is relatively new and no one really thought to look. Previously thinking was that precursor molecules to life form on planets. Why would anyone look in space?
This is really a new area of research so hopefully there's a lot more news to come.
Bravo.
Note: this topic was posted 12/31/2005. Thanks neverdem.
· join · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post new topic · subscribe · | ||
Google news searches: exoplanet · exosolar · extrasolar · | ||
· join · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post new topic · subscribe · Google news searches: exoplanet · exosolar · extrasolar ·
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.