Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-25 last
To: John Jorsett
This law is so good it makes its victims deny their rights have been violated.
38 posted on
12/24/2005 12:11:48 PM PST by
Raycpa
To: John Jorsett
"The Globe interviewed him Thursday but decided not to write a story about his assertion, because of doubts about its veracity."
After how many apologies, firings and retractions did it finally take for the Globe to show a bit of responsibility? Now if only some of this could rub off on the NYT, Wa.Post and CBS.
42 posted on
12/24/2005 1:43:31 PM PST by
moonman
To: John Jorsett
If the liar is 22 years old, why is his identity being protected? I could understand it if he were a minor child, but he's an adult and should be responsible for his actions. He made public statements and has caused a great many adults to run around after his story; he should be held to account for the problems he has caused.
43 posted on
12/24/2005 1:57:08 PM PST by
Capriole
(I don't have any problems that can't be solved by more chocolate or more ammunition.)
To: John Jorsett
Mary Mapes goes to school...
44 posted on
12/24/2005 2:23:55 PM PST by
Doctor Raoul
(Raoul's First Law of Journalism: BIAS = LAYOFFS)
To: John Jorsett
Was there anyone on FR who believed this story? Even a little?
47 posted on
12/24/2005 4:33:23 PM PST by
TheDon
(The Democratic Party is the party of TREASON!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-25 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson