Skip to comments.
Chinese auto supplier aims to take over Delphi
Xinhua ^
Posted on 12/21/2005 8:34:11 AM PST by Pussy_Cat
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
Well Done, Union, and corporate fat cats. You have succeeded in pulling off a feat no other nations can ever achieve: decimating the industry base of US.
1
posted on
12/21/2005 8:34:11 AM PST
by
Pussy_Cat
To: Pussy_Cat
Well Done, Union, and corporate fat cats. You have succeeded in pulling off a feat no other nations can ever achieve: decimating the industry base of US. Shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh! Hold it down friend, Good God don't get the free 'traitors' started. Be careful.....Shhhhhhhh.
2
posted on
12/21/2005 8:39:09 AM PST
by
austinite
To: Pussy_Cat
I'll bet Charles Kettering (Boss Kett) is spinning in his grave.
To: Pussy_Cat
Where have you been since 19th June and your flaming of ProudVet?
4
posted on
12/21/2005 8:40:09 AM PST
by
Darksheare
("Keep it just between us..." she said, and then she faded into the mist.)
To: Pussy_Cat
"History teaches us that when you become indifferent and lose the will to fight, someone who has the will to fight will take over." Col. "Bull Simons"
5
posted on
12/21/2005 8:40:15 AM PST
by
2banana
(My common ground with terrorists - They want to die for Islam, and we want to kill them.)
To: austinite
Why not? Looks like a Bolshevik is here already.
6
posted on
12/21/2005 8:40:46 AM PST
by
1rudeboy
To: Pussy_Cat
"Well Done, Union, and corporate fat cats.."
Don't forget consumers. So basically... everybody.
The reality is that - for a variety of reasons - imports enjoy an economic advantage over domestic products. That's just the way it is.
7
posted on
12/21/2005 8:41:54 AM PST
by
Pessimist
To: 1rudeboy
Not Red here.
I believe in tariffs until the auto industry can re-adjust. It's a matter of national security.
Believe me I want to drive a new honda for 6k but that would mean gutting our industrial base for short term gain ( I have kids ), a base that would be needed in a real shooting war. This is something that free traders don't get.
Free trade = National suicide.
8
posted on
12/21/2005 8:46:40 AM PST
by
austinite
To: Pussy_Cat
This makes sense. China and Japan hold a significant portion of our 8 trillion in government debt, so they might as well start buying up the assets of our bankrupt corporations.
The government and corporate plutocrats in the US love the China model: $9 an hour, no pension, and no health care.
I guess all those junkets to China by US politicians over the years are starting to really pay off.
To: austinite; 1rudeboy
Free traitors are proving to be quite expensive.
10
posted on
12/21/2005 8:48:38 AM PST
by
TXBSAFH
("I would rather be a free man in my grave then living as a puppet or a slave." - Jimmy Cliff)
To: austinite
What do you think will happen to that Honda plant in Marysville, Ohio in case of a shooting war? Flee to Canada?
11
posted on
12/21/2005 8:49:43 AM PST
by
1rudeboy
To: TXBSAFH
No Einstein. Expensive is paying your workers an average of $64.00/hour in wages and benefits. Inexcusable is the Bolshevik-wing of the conservative movement that casts about for villains, and neglects to realize that the primary culprit is its own government.
12
posted on
12/21/2005 8:53:20 AM PST
by
1rudeboy
To: 1rudeboy
Japanese auto manufactors set up US plants starting in the 1980's due to tariffs. Not free trade.
13
posted on
12/21/2005 8:54:09 AM PST
by
TXBSAFH
("I would rather be a free man in my grave then living as a puppet or a slave." - Jimmy Cliff)
To: austinite
I believe in tariffs until the auto industry can re-adjust. It's a matter of national security. The Japanese "threat" appeared in the 1970s and became strong in the 1980s, so the auto industry has had 20-30 years to adjust. How many more decades will they need?
14
posted on
12/21/2005 8:55:30 AM PST
by
KarlInOhio
(What is the most obscene gesture to a Democrat? An Iraqi voter showing him a stained finger.)
To: 1rudeboy
Yes our government is at fault, for entering into free trade agreemenas and not having tariffs.
15
posted on
12/21/2005 8:56:54 AM PST
by
TXBSAFH
("I would rather be a free man in my grave then living as a puppet or a slave." - Jimmy Cliff)
To: TXBSAFH
First of all, it was "voluntary import restrictions," not tariffs. Small point, but you should get your terminology straight on this forum. Secondly, those expired in what, the mid-1980's? Explain the new 1.1 billion dollar Hyundai plant in Alabama.
16
posted on
12/21/2005 9:01:34 AM PST
by
1rudeboy
To: Pussy_Cat
Let the chinese buy Delphi provided they will takeover all of Delphi's debt and pension commitments as well. Somehow, I don't think thats gonna happen in a hurry. The plain truth is the current dispensation is economically unsustainable. Look at it thru whatever glasses ('cept Marxist ones) or from whichever angle.
17
posted on
12/21/2005 9:08:08 AM PST
by
voletti
(Where there is no justice, there is only revenge.)
To: 1rudeboy
Because they want in our markets. You will not see a Chicom company do this.
18
posted on
12/21/2005 9:09:39 AM PST
by
TXBSAFH
("I would rather be a free man in my grave then living as a puppet or a slave." - Jimmy Cliff)
To: TXBSAFH
Japanese auto manufacturers set up US plants starting in the 1980's due to tariffs. Not free trade. Actually, no. Tariffs were always 'bout 3% for cars.(except for "Nixon Shock" in the early 70's)
It was the "voluntary export restraints" of the 80's that made US assembly/mfgr more attractive/necessary
To: 1rudeboy
No Einstein. Expensive is paying your workers an average of $64.00/hour in wages and benefits.So if Delphi and GM drop wages and benefits to the rates paid at Toyota, for example, will you be happy???GM and Ford vehicles already cost less than their Japanes counter parts so we know that with any wage cuts, the vehicle prices will stay the same...
20
posted on
12/21/2005 10:23:59 AM PST
by
Iscool
(Start your own revolution by voting for the candidates the media (and gov't) tells you cannot win.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson